FYI, I can help if you need javascript assistance.
---
Greg Smith wrote:
Shiv wrote:
So my exams are over now and am fully committed to the project in
terms of time. I have started compiling a sort of personal todo
Shiv wrote:
So my exams are over now and am fully committed to the project in
terms of time. I have started compiling a sort of personal todo for
myself. I agree with your advice to start the project with small steps
first. (I have a copy of the code and am trying to glean as much of it
as I
Hi Greg,
So my exams are over now and am fully committed to the project in terms of
time. I have started compiling a sort of personal todo for myself. I agree
with your advice to start the project with small steps first. (I have a copy
of the code and am trying to glean as much of it as I can)
I
That's some great starting advice there. I have a couple of final exams in
the next 36 hours. Will get to work almost immediately after that.
I will definitely take small steps before going for some of the tougher
tasks. I would of-course like this conversation to go on, so I can see a
more
Shiv wrote:
On the program I hope to learn as much about professional software
engineering principles as PostgreSQL. My project is aimed towards
extending and hopefully improving upon pgtune. If any of you have some
ideas or thoughts to share. I am all ears!!
Well, first step on the
Daniel Farina wrote:
It seems like in general it lacks a feedback mechanism to figure things out
settings
from workloads, instead relying on Greg Smith's sizable experience to
do some arithmetic and get you off the ground in a number of common cases.
To credit appropriately, the model used
Every time I've gotten pulled into discussions of setting parameters
based on live monitoring, it's turned into a giant black hole--absorbs a
lot of energy, nothing useful escapes from it. I credit completely
ignoring that idea altogether, and using the simplest possible static
settings
