Re: [HACKERS] macOS Sierra & System Integrity Protection

2017-06-13 Thread Simon Riggs
On 13 June 2017 at 04:25, Robert Haas wrote: > I have a new MacBook Pro running Sierra. Congratulations. > 'make check' was failing: 'psql' repeatedly died with an abort > trap. Binaries worked fine when I ran them from the command line > (sometimes with DYLD_LIBRARY_PATH, if needed) but when

Re: [HACKERS] macOS Sierra & System Integrity Protection

2017-06-13 Thread Tom Lane
Simon Riggs writes: > On 13 June 2017 at 04:25, Robert Haas wrote: >> 'make check' was failing: 'psql' repeatedly died with an abort >> trap. Binaries worked fine when I ran them from the command line >> (sometimes with DYLD_LIBRARY_PATH, if needed) but when run via >> pg_regress, nothing worked

Re: [HACKERS] macOS Sierra & System Integrity Protection

2017-06-13 Thread Peter Eisentraut
On 6/12/17 23:38, Tom Lane wrote: > https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/26098.1446697...@sss.pgh.pa.us > >> My main purpose in writing this email is to pass along what I learned >> in the hopes of sparing somebody else some trouble, but perhaps there >> is a way to modify our regression test set

Re: [HACKERS] macOS Sierra & System Integrity Protection

2017-06-12 Thread Tom Lane
Robert Haas writes: > ... it turns out that System Integrity Protection > feature *also* prevents DYLD_LIBRARY_PATH from being inherited by > child processes in some manner. Yeah, this was already known and documented on the lists a year or two back. I suggest filing a bug report with Apple; if