Tom Lane writes:
-m and -M
The utility we designed and possibly any other that wants to process the
output will find it easier to process a more regularly formed output
instead of one that was embellished for human viewing. The reason for
having one with and one without headings is that in
Peter Eisentraut [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
[ some questions about --help-config ]
I got this reply from Fernando Nasser of Red Hat. I suggested he should
post it for himself, but since he hasn't yet...
regards, tom lane
--- Forwarded Message
Date:Tue, 30
Andrew Dunstan writes:
I have been wondering if moving to XML for config files might be a good
idea - and if there are going to be GUIs that write them that gives some
more impetus to the idea.
What I would like to see done is keeping the GUC data, that is, the name,
the properties, and the
Tom Lane writes:
Gimme a break, guys. There *was* discussion, eg here,
http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-hackers/2003-06/msg01092.php
and the patch was posted for review, see this thread:
http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-patches/2003-06/msg00420.php
I confused this with the private
Peter Eisentraut wrote:
Andrew Dunstan writes:
I have been wondering if moving to XML for config files might be a good
idea - and if there are going to be GUIs that write them that gives some
more impetus to the idea.
What I would like to see done is keeping the GUC data, that is, the
Peter Eisentraut [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
[ some fair points ]
I've asked the Red Hat folks who did the detail design to respond to
this. I'm not sure if they had specific use-cases in mind for those
behaviors, or were just trying to make the feature useful for manual
invocation. I would
-Original Message-
From: Tom Lane [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 29 September 2003 01:28
To: Alvaro Herrera
Cc: Peter Eisentraut; Hackers
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] more i18n/l10n issues
Alvaro Herrera [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
If you put it that way :-) I'll leave it alone
Dave Page writes:
I find this a little worrying because if we want a feature or tweak for
pgAdmin we usually have to fight tooth nail to justify getting it
committed (which is not a bad thing), however 'some guys at Red Hat' are
getting switches added to the postmaster without any
Peter Eisentraut wrote:
Dave Page writes:
I find this a little worrying because if we want a feature or tweak for
pgAdmin we usually have to fight tooth nail to justify getting it
committed (which is not a bad thing), however 'some guys at Red Hat' are
getting switches added to the
Peter Eisentraut [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Dave Page writes:
I find this a little worrying because if we want a feature or tweak for
pgAdmin we usually have to fight tooth nail to justify getting it
committed (which is not a bad thing), however 'some guys at Red Hat' are
getting switches
-Original Message-
From: Tom Lane [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 29 September 2003 15:23
To: Peter Eisentraut
Cc: Dave Page; Alvaro Herrera; Hackers
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] more i18n/l10n issues
Peter Eisentraut [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Dave Page writes:
I find
Should we allow SHOW ALL to show these variable descriptions?
---
Tom Lane wrote:
Peter Eisentraut [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Dave Page writes:
I find this a little worrying because if we want a feature or tweak for
And maybe show the descriptions in pg_settings too?
---
Tom Lane wrote:
Peter Eisentraut [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Dave Page writes:
I find this a little worrying because if we want a feature or tweak for
pgAdmin we
Tom Lane wrote:
The point was to allow a GUI utility to be built that would help in
editing postgresql.conf. It couldn't assume the postmaster is already
running, so just extending the pg_config view wouldn't answer, and
duplicating knowledge of all the GUC variables in a separate tool
would
Bruce Momjian [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
And maybe show the descriptions in pg_settings too?
There was discussion of doing that, but it didn't get done in time
(and it's too late now for 7.4 unless you want an initdb). I wouldn't
mind putting it on TODO for 7.5.
I think the SHOW ALL output
Joe Conway wrote:
Tom Lane wrote:
Bruce Momjian [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
And maybe show the descriptions in pg_settings too?
There was discussion of doing that, but it didn't get done in time
(and it's too late now for 7.4 unless you want an initdb). I wouldn't
mind putting it on
Tom Lane wrote:
Bruce Momjian [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
And maybe show the descriptions in pg_settings too?
There was discussion of doing that, but it didn't get done in time
(and it's too late now for 7.4 unless you want an initdb). I wouldn't
mind putting it on TODO for 7.5.
Bruce, you can put
Alvaro Herrera writes:
#: utils/misc/guc.c:647
msgid collect statistics about executing commands
Is this really statistics about the executing commands?
Looks like it.
#: utils/misc/guc.c:892
msgid
The number must be a positive integer. If 0 is specified then effort *
log2(poolsize)
Andrew Dunstan [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I have been wondering if moving to XML for config files might be a good
idea - and if there are going to be GUIs that write them that gives some
more impetus to the idea.
Or would it be overkill?
Seems like overkill. What would it buy us, other
On Sun, Sep 28, 2003 at 03:36:50PM -0400, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
Now for something completely different:
Oh, there's another thing about the --help-config option. This option
includes an, er, option to display the items that belong to a given
group. So you could say
/tmp/pgsql-es/bin/postgres
Alvaro Herrera [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Now for something completely different:
The postmaster executable shows --help display perfectly localized.
However I just noted that postgres --help output (the standalone
backend) does not; is it not i18n'ed, or is some sort of missetup?
Alvaro Herrera writes:
Oh, there's another thing about the --help-config option. This option
includes an, er, option to display the items that belong to a given
group. So you could say
/tmp/pgsql-es/bin/postgres --help-config -g 'Security'
and the list of parameters that belong to a
On Mon, Sep 29, 2003 at 12:27:01AM +0200, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
Alvaro Herrera writes:
[fixes for --help-config]
I'm quite unhappy about the --help-config option. It was developed
without discussion, it was installed hastily, we don't have any
information about that interactive
Alvaro Herrera [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
If you put it that way :-) I'll leave it alone. I hope it can be
enhanced in the next release. I'm not sure of it usefulness anyway;
the documentation seems good enough.
Some guys at Red Hat wanted it to support an admin tool that should see
the light
24 matches
Mail list logo
