On Fri, Dec 23, 2016 at 12:54 AM, Ashutosh Bapat
wrote:
> Another question: do we want to commit the code for creating
> unflattened hierarchy separately or along with partition-wise join?
Probably separately. I suggest posting a series of two (or perhaps
more) patches on the same thread. 'git
Another question: do we want to commit the code for creating
unflattened hierarchy separately or along with partition-wise join?
On Fri, Dec 23, 2016 at 9:58 AM, Ashutosh Bapat
wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 22, 2016 at 10:52 PM, Robert Haas wrote:
>> On Wed, Dec 21, 2016 at 11:31 PM, Ashutosh Bapat
>> w
On Thu, Dec 22, 2016 at 10:52 PM, Robert Haas wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 21, 2016 at 11:31 PM, Ashutosh Bapat
> wrote:
>> Given the scenario described above, it looks like we have to retain
>> partition hierarchy in the form of inheritance hierarchy in order to
>> implement partition-wise joins for mul
On Wed, Dec 21, 2016 at 11:31 PM, Ashutosh Bapat
wrote:
> Given the scenario described above, it looks like we have to retain
> partition hierarchy in the form of inheritance hierarchy in order to
> implement partition-wise joins for multi-leveled partition tables. Is
> that the right thing to do?
On Wed, Dec 21, 2016 at 10:25 PM, Robert Haas wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 21, 2016 at 6:36 AM, Ashutosh Bapat
> wrote:
>> I am starting this as a separate thread for this since the declarative
>> partitioning thread has many issues reported and it's better to keep
>> this discussion separate from the is
On Wed, Dec 21, 2016 at 6:36 AM, Ashutosh Bapat
wrote:
> I am starting this as a separate thread for this since the declarative
> partitioning thread has many issues reported and it's better to keep
> this discussion separate from the issues reported on that thread.
>
> While expanding inheritance
