Actually, I never made the change until now. I thought I had already
did it. Sorry.
---
pgman wrote:
>
> Change made.
>
> ---
>
> Tom Lane wrote:
>
Change made.
---
Tom Lane wrote:
> Bruce Momjian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > Should the new threading configure option be called:
> > --enable-thread-safeness
> > or
> > --enable-thread-safety
>
> safety is a c
Bruce Momjian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Should the new threading configure option be called:
> --enable-thread-safeness
> or
> --enable-thread-safety
safety is a common word, safeness isn't. (The OED has entries for both,
but the entry for safety is about 10x longer; a smaller di
--On Thursday, July 24, 2003 21:42:59 -0400 Bruce Momjian
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Should the new threading configure option be called:
--enable-thread-safeness
or
--enable-thread-safety
or something else? Someone was asking me about the validity of the word
safeness.
the latter, IMHO.
