Re: [HACKERS] ossp-uuid Contrib Patch

2012-09-12 Thread Nathan Wagner
On Mon, Sep 10, 2012 at 04:23:00PM -0700, David E. Wheeler wrote: > Well given that OSSP seems to be abandon ware (no activity since July > 2008), it might be time to dump it in favor of something else. Perhaps this would be a good time to bring up my uuid code again. I've got a module for uuid s

Re: [HACKERS] ossp-uuid Contrib Patch

2012-09-11 Thread David E. Wheeler
On Sep 10, 2012, at 6:05 PM, Peter Eisentraut wrote: >> Yeah, maybe. It doesn't even seem to be the "standard" implementation >> on Linux or Mac. A bit of research says that Theodore Ts'o's libuuid >> is what comes native with the OS on those platforms. No idea whether >> the functionality is

Re: [HACKERS] ossp-uuid Contrib Patch

2012-09-11 Thread David E. Wheeler
On Sep 10, 2012, at 6:01 PM, Peter Eisentraut wrote: >> Well given that OSSP seems to be abandon ware (no activity since July >> 2008), it might be time to dump it in favor of something else. > > Are there any outstanding issues that would require an update? Many. Look at all the issues with th

Re: [HACKERS] ossp-uuid Contrib Patch

2012-09-10 Thread Peter Eisentraut
On Mon, 2012-09-10 at 20:15 -0400, Tom Lane wrote: > "David E. Wheeler" writes: > > Well given that OSSP seems to be abandon ware (no activity since July > > 2008), it might be time to dump it in favor of something else. > > Yeah, maybe. It doesn't even seem to be the "standard" implementation

Re: [HACKERS] ossp-uuid Contrib Patch

2012-09-10 Thread Peter Eisentraut
On Mon, 2012-09-10 at 16:23 -0700, David E. Wheeler wrote: > Well given that OSSP seems to be abandon ware (no activity since July > 2008), it might be time to dump it in favor of something else. Are there any outstanding issues that would require an update? -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing l

Re: [HACKERS] ossp-uuid Contrib Patch

2012-09-10 Thread Tom Lane
"David E. Wheeler" writes: > Well given that OSSP seems to be abandon ware (no activity since July 2008), > it might be time to dump it in favor of something else. Yeah, maybe. It doesn't even seem to be the "standard" implementation on Linux or Mac. A bit of research says that Theodore Ts'o's

Re: [HACKERS] ossp-uuid Contrib Patch

2012-09-10 Thread David E. Wheeler
On Sep 10, 2012, at 4:16 PM, Tom Lane wrote: > The long and the short of it is that the OSSP guys need to fix their > code. I'm not excited about kluges like > >> +#define _XOPEN_SOURCE > > which might band-aid around their mistake, but at what price? We have > no idea what side-effects that

Re: [HACKERS] ossp-uuid Contrib Patch

2012-09-10 Thread Tom Lane
"David E. Wheeler" writes: > I ran into an issue building 9.2 with the OSSP UUID module today. A bit of > Googling and I found that the MacPorts guys ran into the same issue a few > weeks ago. Their discussion: The long and the short of it is that the OSSP guys need to fix their code. I'm not