On 23 January 2012 20:14, Pavel Stehule pavel.steh...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello
2012/1/23 Robert Haas robertmh...@gmail.com:
On Tue, Jan 3, 2012 at 2:49 PM, Pavel Stehule pavel.steh...@gmail.com
wrote:
jup, we can continue in enhancing step by step.
I change a patch and now ALTER TABLE,
On 27.01.2012 11:57, Dean Rasheed wrote:
I just noticed this copy-and-paste error in the ALTER FOREIGN TABLE docs:
IF EXISTS:
Do not throw an error if the sequence does not exist. A notice is issued
in this case.
That should be foreign table not sequence.
Thanks, fixed.
--
On Tue, Jan 3, 2012 at 7:49 PM, Pavel Stehule pavel.steh...@gmail.com wrote:
I change a patch and now ALTER TABLE, ALTER INDEX, ALTER SEQUENCE and
ALTER VIEW has IF EXISTS clause
Patch no longer applies. Pls update.
--
Simon Riggs http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL
On Tue, Jan 3, 2012 at 2:49 PM, Pavel Stehule pavel.steh...@gmail.com wrote:
jup, we can continue in enhancing step by step.
I change a patch and now ALTER TABLE, ALTER INDEX, ALTER SEQUENCE and
ALTER VIEW has IF EXISTS clause
ALTER FOREIGN TABLE should be parallel as well, I think.
--
On Mon, Jan 2, 2012 at 12:01 PM, Pavel Stehule pavel.steh...@gmail.com wrote:
here is updated patch
I think the comments in parse_utilcmd.c probably need a bit of adjustment.
--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers
Hello
2012/1/3 Robert Haas robertmh...@gmail.com:
On Mon, Jan 2, 2012 at 12:01 PM, Pavel Stehule pavel.steh...@gmail.com
wrote:
here is updated patch
I think the comments in parse_utilcmd.c probably need a bit of adjustment.
I don't see it - there is only one comment and it is adjusted
On Tue, Jan 3, 2012 at 10:38 AM, Pavel Stehule pavel.steh...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello
2012/1/3 Robert Haas robertmh...@gmail.com:
On Mon, Jan 2, 2012 at 12:01 PM, Pavel Stehule pavel.steh...@gmail.com
wrote:
here is updated patch
I think the comments in parse_utilcmd.c probably need a bit
Hello
2012/1/3 Robert Haas robertmh...@gmail.com:
On Tue, Jan 3, 2012 at 10:38 AM, Pavel Stehule pavel.steh...@gmail.com
wrote:
Hello
2012/1/3 Robert Haas robertmh...@gmail.com:
On Mon, Jan 2, 2012 at 12:01 PM, Pavel Stehule pavel.steh...@gmail.com
wrote:
here is updated patch
I think
On Mon, Jan 2, 2012 at 1:11 PM, Pavel Stehule pavel.steh...@gmail.com wrote:
this is relative simple patch that add possibility to skip noexisting
tables. It is necessary for silent cleaning when dump is loaded.
Agreed, nice simple and uncontentious patch.
All good apart from two minor
On 2 Leden 2012, 14:11, Pavel Stehule wrote:
Hello
this is relative simple patch that add possibility to skip noexisting
tables. It is necessary for silent cleaning when dump is loaded.
Just a curious question - what use case is solved by this? Under what
circumstances you get an ALTER TABLE
Hello
2012/1/2 Tomas Vondra t...@fuzzy.cz:
On 2 Leden 2012, 14:11, Pavel Stehule wrote:
Hello
this is relative simple patch that add possibility to skip noexisting
tables. It is necessary for silent cleaning when dump is loaded.
Just a curious question - what use case is solved by this?
Hello
here is updated patch
Regards
Pavel
2012/1/2 Simon Riggs si...@2ndquadrant.com:
On Mon, Jan 2, 2012 at 1:11 PM, Pavel Stehule pavel.steh...@gmail.com wrote:
this is relative simple patch that add possibility to skip noexisting
tables. It is necessary for silent cleaning when dump is
12 matches
Mail list logo