Re: [HACKERS] pg_ctl restart - behaviour based on wrong instance

2011-10-18 Thread Magnus Hagander
On Wednesday, October 12, 2011, Bruce Momjian wrote: Magnus Hagander wrote: I looked over this issue and I don't thinking having pg_ctl restart fall back to 'start' is a good solution. ?I am concerned about cases where we start a different server without shutting down the old server,

Re: [HACKERS] pg_ctl restart - behaviour based on wrong instance

2011-10-18 Thread Fujii Masao
On Tue, Oct 18, 2011 at 11:02 PM, Magnus Hagander mag...@hagander.net wrote: Ok, fixed and applied. You seem to have forgot to change protocol.sgml. Patch attached. Regards, -- Fujii Masao NIPPON TELEGRAPH AND TELEPHONE CORPORATION NTT Open Source Software Center protocol_sgml_v1.patch

Re: [HACKERS] pg_ctl restart - behaviour based on wrong instance

2011-10-18 Thread Fujii Masao
On Tue, Oct 18, 2011 at 11:02 PM, Magnus Hagander mag...@hagander.net wrote: Ok, fixed and applied. You seem to have forgot to change protocol.sgml. Patch attached. Regards, -- Fujii Masao NIPPON TELEGRAPH AND TELEPHONE CORPORATION NTT Open Source Software Center protocol_sgml_v1.patch

Re: [HACKERS] pg_ctl restart - behaviour based on wrong instance

2011-10-18 Thread Fujii Masao
On Tue, Oct 18, 2011 at 11:02 PM, Magnus Hagander mag...@hagander.net wrote: Ok, fixed and applied. You seem to have forgot to change protocol.sgml. Patch attached. Regards, -- Fujii Masao NIPPON TELEGRAPH AND TELEPHONE CORPORATION NTT Open Source Software Center protocol_sgml_v1.patch

Re: [HACKERS] pg_ctl restart - behaviour based on wrong instance

2011-10-18 Thread Fujii Masao
On Tue, Oct 18, 2011 at 11:02 PM, Magnus Hagander mag...@hagander.net wrote: Ok, fixed and applied. You seem to have forgot to change protocol.sgml. Patch attached. Regards, -- Fujii Masao NIPPON TELEGRAPH AND TELEPHONE CORPORATION NTT Open Source Software Center protocol_sgml_v1.patch

Re: [HACKERS] pg_ctl restart - behaviour based on wrong instance

2011-10-18 Thread Fujii Masao
Oh, sorry for repeating the same posts. Gmail seems to have not worked fine... :( On Wed, Oct 19, 2011 at 1:24 AM, Fujii Masao masao.fu...@gmail.com wrote: On Tue, Oct 18, 2011 at 11:02 PM, Magnus Hagander mag...@hagander.net wrote: Ok, fixed and applied. You seem to have forgot to change

Re: [HACKERS] pg_ctl restart - behaviour based on wrong instance

2011-10-18 Thread Robert Haas
On Tue, Oct 18, 2011 at 12:18 PM, Fujii Masao masao.fu...@gmail.com wrote: On Tue, Oct 18, 2011 at 11:02 PM, Magnus Hagander mag...@hagander.net wrote: Ok, fixed and applied. You seem to have forgot to change protocol.sgml. Patch attached. Committed. -- Robert Haas EnterpriseDB:

Re: [HACKERS] pg_ctl restart - behaviour based on wrong instance

2011-10-12 Thread Magnus Hagander
On Tue, Oct 11, 2011 at 23:35, Bruce Momjian br...@momjian.us wrote: Robert Haas wrote: On Wed, Mar 23, 2011 at 1:48 AM, Fujii Masao masao.fu...@gmail.com wrote: On Sat, Mar 19, 2011 at 10:20 AM, Robert Haas robertmh...@gmail.com wrote: On Fri, Mar 18, 2011 at 1:19 PM, Erik Rijkers

Re: [HACKERS] pg_ctl restart - behaviour based on wrong instance

2011-10-12 Thread Bruce Momjian
Magnus Hagander wrote: I looked over this issue and I don't thinking having pg_ctl restart fall back to 'start' is a good solution. ?I am concerned about cases where we start a different server without shutting down the old server, for some reason. ?When they say 'restart', I think we have

Re: [HACKERS] pg_ctl restart - behaviour based on wrong instance

2011-10-11 Thread Bruce Momjian
Robert Haas wrote: On Wed, Mar 23, 2011 at 1:48 AM, Fujii Masao masao.fu...@gmail.com wrote: On Sat, Mar 19, 2011 at 10:20 AM, Robert Haas robertmh...@gmail.com wrote: On Fri, Mar 18, 2011 at 1:19 PM, Erik Rijkers e...@xs4all.nl wrote: This is OK and expected. ?But then it continues (in the

Re: [HACKERS] pg_ctl restart - behaviour based on wrong instance

2011-09-05 Thread Bruce Momjian
Robert Haas wrote: On Wed, Mar 23, 2011 at 1:48 AM, Fujii Masao masao.fu...@gmail.com wrote: On Sat, Mar 19, 2011 at 10:20 AM, Robert Haas robertmh...@gmail.com wrote: On Fri, Mar 18, 2011 at 1:19 PM, Erik Rijkers e...@xs4all.nl wrote: This is OK and expected. ?But then it continues (in the

Re: [HACKERS] pg_ctl restart - behaviour based on wrong instance

2011-04-26 Thread Bruce Momjian
Fujii Masao wrote: On Sat, Mar 19, 2011 at 10:20 AM, Robert Haas robertmh...@gmail.com wrote: On Fri, Mar 18, 2011 at 1:19 PM, Erik Rijkers e...@xs4all.nl wrote: This is OK and expected. ?But then it continues (in the logfile) with: FATAL: ?lock file postmaster.pid already exists HINT:

Re: [HACKERS] pg_ctl restart - behaviour based on wrong instance

2011-03-23 Thread Robert Haas
On Wed, Mar 23, 2011 at 1:48 AM, Fujii Masao masao.fu...@gmail.com wrote: On Sat, Mar 19, 2011 at 10:20 AM, Robert Haas robertmh...@gmail.com wrote: On Fri, Mar 18, 2011 at 1:19 PM, Erik Rijkers e...@xs4all.nl wrote: This is OK and expected.  But then it continues (in the logfile) with:

Re: [HACKERS] pg_ctl restart - behaviour based on wrong instance

2011-03-22 Thread Fujii Masao
On Sat, Mar 19, 2011 at 10:20 AM, Robert Haas robertmh...@gmail.com wrote: On Fri, Mar 18, 2011 at 1:19 PM, Erik Rijkers e...@xs4all.nl wrote: This is OK and expected.  But then it continues (in the logfile) with: FATAL:  lock file postmaster.pid already exists HINT:  Is another postmaster

Re: [HACKERS] pg_ctl restart - behaviour based on wrong instance

2011-03-18 Thread Robert Haas
On Fri, Mar 18, 2011 at 1:19 PM, Erik Rijkers e...@xs4all.nl wrote: This is OK and expected.  But then it continues (in the logfile) with: FATAL:  lock file postmaster.pid already exists HINT:  Is another postmaster (PID 20519) running in data directory