On Sat, Oct 04, 2003 at 14:24:40 -0400,
Tom Lane <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Bruno Wolff III <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > The following is still a problem in current cvs (as of 2 hours ago).
>
> Not any more ;-)
Thanks. I tried it out and it is now working for me.
-
Bruce Momjian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I have added this to the 7.4 open items list:
> Fix pg_dump of CREATE TABLE test (col1 BOOLEAN CONSTRAINT test
> CHECK (col1))
Fixed now.
regards, tom lane
---(end of broadcast)--
Bruno Wolff III <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> The following is still a problem in current cvs (as of 2 hours ago).
Not any more ;-)
regards, tom lane
---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 9: the planner will ignore your desire to cho
I have added this to the 7.4 open items list:
Fix pg_dump of CREATE TABLE test (col1 BOOLEAN CONSTRAINT test
CHECK (col1))
---
Bruno Wolff III wrote:
> The following is still a problem in current cvs (as of
When grilled further on (Sat, 4 Oct 2003 12:50:27 -0500),
Bruno Wolff III <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> confessed:
> The following is still a problem in current cvs (as of 2 hours ago).
> Normally I wouldn't bug people about this again this soon, but with talk of
> a release candidate next week I wanted to
The following is still a problem in current cvs (as of 2 hours ago).
Normally I wouldn't bug people about this again this soon, but with talk of
a release candidate next week I wanted to make sure that it wasn't forgotten.
On Sun, Sep 28, 2003 at 20:14:03 -0500,
Bruno Wolff III <[EMAIL PROTECTED
Christopher Kings-Lynne <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> If you are referring to my patch, Bruce - that does not fix it. Mine
> only addresses psql.
It strikes me that maybe your patch should add parens always, rather
than just in the prettyprint case.
> I don't think that pg_dump uses pg_get_cons
Bruno Wolff III wrote:
> On Sun, Sep 28, 2003 at 23:16:48 -0400,
> Bruce Momjian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Christopher Kings-Lynne wrote:
> > > If you are referring to my patch, Bruce - that does not fix it. Mine
> > > only addresses psql.
> > >
> > > I don't think that pg_dump uses pg_ge
On Sun, Sep 28, 2003 at 23:16:48 -0400,
Bruce Momjian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Christopher Kings-Lynne wrote:
> > If you are referring to my patch, Bruce - that does not fix it. Mine
> > only addresses psql.
> >
> > I don't think that pg_dump uses pg_get_constraintdef(). It's probably a
Christopher Kings-Lynne wrote:
> If you are referring to my patch, Bruce - that does not fix it. Mine
> only addresses psql.
>
> I don't think that pg_dump uses pg_get_constraintdef(). It's probably a
> side effect of switching from using consrc to conbin.
Oh, yea. If forgot the pretty prin
If you are referring to my patch, Bruce - that does not fix it. Mine
only addresses psql.
I don't think that pg_dump uses pg_get_constraintdef(). It's probably a
side effect of switching from using consrc to conbin.
Chris
Bruce Momjian wrote:
I have a fix for this in the patch queue and it w
I have a fix for this in the patch queue and it will be applied in 24
hours. If you want to try it, it is at:
http://momjian.postgresql.org/cgi-bin/pgpatches
---
Bruno Wolff III wrote:
> If you have a check const
12 matches
Mail list logo
