Re: [HACKERS] pg_stat_statements in core

2008-10-22 Thread ITAGAKI Takahiro
Tom Lane <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > It needs to be a contrib or pgfoundry package for awhile, > to shake out feature issues in a context where users will understand > the API is subject to change. Agreed. That is what I want to do at first. > It seems to me that all you're really missing is a

Re: [HACKERS] pg_stat_statements in core

2008-10-21 Thread Tom Lane
ITAGAKI Takahiro <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> Now I'm working on storing statistics into disks on server >> shutdown. If it is impossible unless the module is in core, >> I would change my policy... I'm really not happy with a proposal to put such a feature in core. Once it's in core we'll have