On Thu, Jan 17, 2013 at 7:43 PM, Tatsuo Ishii is...@postgresql.org wrote:
So if my understating is correct, 1)Tomas Vondra commits to work on
Windows support for 9.4, 2)on the assumption that one of Andrew
Dunstan, Dave Page or Magnus Hagander will help him in Windows
development.
Ok? If
On Thu, Jan 17, 2013 at 7:43 PM, Tatsuo Ishii is...@postgresql.org wrote:
So if my understating is correct, 1)Tomas Vondra commits to work on
Windows support for 9.4, 2)on the assumption that one of Andrew
Dunstan, Dave Page or Magnus Hagander will help him in Windows
development.
Ok? If
On Thu, Jan 17, 2013 at 7:43 PM, Tatsuo Ishii is...@postgresql.org wrote:
So if my understating is correct, 1)Tomas Vondra commits to work on
Windows support for 9.4, 2)on the assumption that one of Andrew
Dunstan, Dave Page or Magnus Hagander will help him in Windows
development.
Ok? If so,
On Thu, Jan 17, 2013 at 7:43 PM, Tatsuo Ishii is...@postgresql.org wrote:
So if my understating is correct, 1)Tomas Vondra commits to work on
Windows support for 9.4, 2)on the assumption that one of Andrew
Dunstan, Dave Page or Magnus Hagander will help him in Windows
development.
Ok? If
On Thu, Jan 17, 2013 at 2:35 AM, Tatsuo Ishii is...@postgresql.org wrote:
This might be way more than we want to do, but there is an article
that describes some techniques for doing what seems to be missing
(AIUI):
http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/magazine/cc163996.aspx
Even this would be
On Thu, Jan 17, 2013 at 9:36 AM, Magnus Hagander mag...@hagander.net wrote:
On Thu, Jan 17, 2013 at 2:35 AM, Tatsuo Ishii is...@postgresql.org wrote:
This might be way more than we want to do, but there is an article
that describes some techniques for doing what seems to be missing
(AIUI):
On Thu, Jan 17, 2013 at 11:09 AM, Dave Page dp...@pgadmin.org wrote:
On Thu, Jan 17, 2013 at 9:36 AM, Magnus Hagander mag...@hagander.net wrote:
On Thu, Jan 17, 2013 at 2:35 AM, Tatsuo Ishii is...@postgresql.org wrote:
This might be way more than we want to do, but there is an article
that
Dne 17.01.2013 10:36, Magnus Hagander napsal:
On Thu, Jan 17, 2013 at 2:35 AM, Tatsuo Ishii is...@postgresql.org
wrote:
This might be way more than we want to do, but there is an
article
that describes some techniques for doing what seems to be missing
(AIUI):
Dne 17.01.2013 11:16, Magnus Hagander napsal:
On Thu, Jan 17, 2013 at 11:09 AM, Dave Page dp...@pgadmin.org
wrote:
On Thu, Jan 17, 2013 at 9:36 AM, Magnus Hagander
mag...@hagander.net wrote:
We have committed platform-specific features before, but generally
only when it's not *possible* to do
On 01/17/2013 06:11 AM, Tomas Vondra wrote:
Dne 17.01.2013 11:16, Magnus Hagander napsal:
On Thu, Jan 17, 2013 at 11:09 AM, Dave Page dp...@pgadmin.org wrote:
On Thu, Jan 17, 2013 at 9:36 AM, Magnus Hagander
mag...@hagander.net wrote:
We have committed platform-specific features before, but
On 01/17/2013 06:04 AM, Tomas Vondra wrote:
The problem is I have access to absolutely no Windows machines,
not mentioning the development tools (and that I have no clue about it).
I vaguely remember there were people on this list doing Windows
development
on a virtual machine or something.
On Thu, Jan 17, 2013 at 1:29 PM, Andrew Dunstan and...@dunslane.net wrote:
On 01/17/2013 06:04 AM, Tomas Vondra wrote:
The problem is I have access to absolutely no Windows machines,
not mentioning the development tools (and that I have no clue about it).
I vaguely remember there were
On Thu, Jan 17, 2013 at 2:29 PM, Andrew Dunstan and...@dunslane.net wrote:
On 01/17/2013 06:04 AM, Tomas Vondra wrote:
The problem is I have access to absolutely no Windows machines,
not mentioning the development tools (and that I have no clue about it).
I vaguely remember there were
On Thu, Jan 17, 2013 at 2:29 PM, Andrew Dunstan and...@dunslane.net wrote:
On 01/17/2013 06:04 AM, Tomas Vondra wrote:
The problem is I have access to absolutely no Windows machines,
not mentioning the development tools (and that I have no clue about it).
I vaguely remember there were
Hi,
I'm looking into this as a committer. It seems that this is the
newest patch and the reviewer(Pavel) stated that it is ready for
commit. However, I noticed that this patch adds a Linux/UNIX only
feature(not available on Windows). So I would like to ask cores if
this is ok or not.
--
Tatsuo
On 01/16/2013 05:59 PM, Tatsuo Ishii wrote:
Hi,
I'm looking into this as a committer. It seems that this is the
newest patch and the reviewer(Pavel) stated that it is ready for
commit. However, I noticed that this patch adds a Linux/UNIX only
feature(not available on Windows). So I would like
I'm looking into this as a committer. It seems that this is the
newest patch and the reviewer(Pavel) stated that it is ready for
commit. However, I noticed that this patch adds a Linux/UNIX only
feature(not available on Windows). So I would like to ask cores if
this is ok or not.
I
On 01/16/2013 06:48 PM, Tatsuo Ishii wrote:
I'm looking into this as a committer. It seems that this is the
newest patch and the reviewer(Pavel) stated that it is ready for
commit. However, I noticed that this patch adds a Linux/UNIX only
feature(not available on Windows). So I would like to
It seems instr_time.h on Windows simply does not provide current
timestamp. From pgbench.c:
/*
* if transaction finished, record the time it took in the log
*/
if (logfile commands[st-state + 1] == NULL)
{
On 01/16/2013 08:05 PM, Tatsuo Ishii wrote:
It seems instr_time.h on Windows simply does not provide current
timestamp. From pgbench.c:
/*
* if transaction finished, record the time it took in the log
*/
if (logfile
This might be way more than we want to do, but there is an article
that describes some techniques for doing what seems to be missing
(AIUI):
http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/magazine/cc163996.aspx
Even this would be doable, I'm afraid it may not fit in 9.3 if we
think about the current
Hi Tomas,
On 2012-11-27 14:55:59 +0100, Pavel Stehule wrote:
attached is a v4 of the patch. There are not many changes, mostly some
simple tidying up, except for handling the Windows.
After a quick look I am not sure what all the talk about windows is
about? instr_time.h seems to provide all
On 8.12.2012 16:33, Andres Freund wrote:
Hi Tomas,
On 2012-11-27 14:55:59 +0100, Pavel Stehule wrote:
attached is a v4 of the patch. There are not many changes, mostly some
simple tidying up, except for handling the Windows.
After a quick look I am not sure what all the talk about windows
Hi,
attached is a v5 of this patch. Details below:
On 8.12.2012 16:33, Andres Freund wrote:
Hi Tomas,
On 2012-11-27 14:55:59 +0100, Pavel Stehule wrote:
attached is a v4 of the patch. There are not many changes, mostly some
simple tidying up, except for handling the Windows.
After a
Hello
2012/11/12 Tomas Vondra t...@fuzzy.cz:
Hi,
attached is a v4 of the patch. There are not many changes, mostly some
simple tidying up, except for handling the Windows.
After a bit more investigation, it seems to me that we can't really get
the same behavior as in other systems -
Hi,
attached is a v4 of the patch. There are not many changes, mostly some
simple tidying up, except for handling the Windows.
After a bit more investigation, it seems to me that we can't really get
the same behavior as in other systems - basically the timestamp is
unavailable so we can't log
26 matches
Mail list logo
