--On Tuesday, February 03, 2004 11:12:03 -0500 Andrew Dunstan
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Peter Eisentraut wrote:
Andrew Dunstan wrote:
I am less sure of the utility of such an ID, though. After all, if
you see a disconnect log message for a given PID you must know that
any reuse of that PI
Peter Eisentraut wrote:
Andrew Dunstan wrote:
I am less sure of the utility of such an ID, though. After all, if
you see a disconnect log message for a given PID you must know that
any reuse of that PID indicates a new session, or even if you just
see a connection message you know it must be
Andrew Dunstan wrote:
> I am less sure of the utility of such an ID, though. After all, if
> you see a disconnect log message for a given PID you must know that
> any reuse of that PID indicates a new session, or even if you just
> see a connection message you know it must be a new session. OTOH,
>
> >
> > Tom Lane wrote:
> >
> >> Andrew Dunstan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> >>
> >>> I did think about using a cluster-wide sequence, if we can make such
> >>> a thing (might also be useful for system generated UIDs too).
> >>
> >> Not a good idea IMHO. If you do that, then there will be no suc
