Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> Bruce Momjian wrote:
> > ! *** If you are going to modify the lexer files or build from CVS,
> > the installed ! *** version of Bison is too old. Bison version 1.875
> > or later is required.])
>
> Bison has nothing to do with the lexer files.
Oops, sorry, new text:
**
Bruce Momjian wrote:
> ! *** If you are going to modify the lexer files or build from CVS,
> the installed ! *** version of Bison is too old. Bison version 1.875
> or later is required.])
Bison has nothing to do with the lexer files.
---(end of broadcast)
Tom Lane wrote:
> Jonathan Scott <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > I checked my system, and bison is reporting itself as 1.875. I am using SuSE 9.0,
> > and I did have to upgrade to get that configuration message to go away, AND to
> > make it compile.
>
> > Could you recommend a way I could get
Jonathan Scott <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I checked my system, and bison is reporting itself as 1.875. I am using SuSE 9.0,
> and I did have to upgrade to get that configuration message to go away, AND to make
> it compile.
> Could you recommend a way I could get bison to reproduce that mess
Thanks for writing, Tom.
I checked my system, and bison is reporting itself as 1.875. I am using SuSE 9.0, and
I did have to upgrade to get that configuration message to go away, AND to make it
compile.
Could you recommend a way I could get bison to reproduce that message? Perhaps I
should re
Jonathan Scott <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> When using the current head of pgsql, I find four errors when running "make check".
> They are all of the same nature, basically that the expected.out file has "syntax
> error", where as psql is saying "parse error".
What bison version are you using?
