Re: [HACKERS] src/interfaces/cli

2003-08-14 Thread Bruce Momjian
Agreed. I have been using ecpg a little and it is really great. --- Tom Lane wrote: > Peter Eisentraut <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > Does anyone mind if I remove src/interfaces/cli? It's clearly outdated > > and useless.

Re: [HACKERS] src/interfaces/cli

2003-08-14 Thread Peter Eisentraut
Tom Lane writes: > Looking at the CVS history, it seems that Lockhart had an idea of > building a CLI-spec-compatible interface on top of ecpg, but never > went further than an initial commit. CLI is ODBC, not ecpg. -- Peter Eisentraut [EMAIL PROTECTED] ---(end of bro

Re: [HACKERS] src/interfaces/cli

2003-08-11 Thread Tom Lane
Peter Eisentraut <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Does anyone mind if I remove src/interfaces/cli? It's clearly outdated > and useless. Looking at the CVS history, it seems that Lockhart had an idea of building a CLI-spec-compatible interface on top of ecpg, but never went further than an initial co