Stefan Kaltenbrunner writes:
> yeah the point about 9.0.x is a very good one - so I think we will
> target mid/end of october for borka so we get a bit of time to deal with
> any fallout from the release (if needed).
Sounds like a plan.
> We could target the same
On 09/25/2015 08:53 PM, Andres Freund wrote:
> On 2015-09-25 20:47:21 +0200, Stefan Kaltenbrunner wrote:
>> yeah the point about 9.0.x is a very good one - so I think we will
>> target mid/end of october for borka so we get a bit of time to deal with
>> any fallout from the release (if needed).
>>
On 2015-09-25 20:47:21 +0200, Stefan Kaltenbrunner wrote:
> yeah the point about 9.0.x is a very good one - so I think we will
> target mid/end of october for borka so we get a bit of time to deal with
> any fallout from the release (if needed).
>
> We could target the same timeframe for gemulon,
Stefan Kaltenbrunner writes:
> * borka.postgresql.org - official tarball and docs build server, the
> upgrade will upgrade the toolchain on that box to the respective
> versions of what is in jessie. If people think it is necessarily to
> (double)check the effects
On 2015-09-25 20:11:32 +0200, Stefan Kaltenbrunner wrote:
> no date set yet though
> * gemulon.postgresql.org - gitmaster.postgresql, master git repository
> (we will likely coordinate this internally so that somebody on the team
> with a commit bit will test after the upgrade)
I'm pretty sure
On 09/25/2015 08:30 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
> Stefan Kaltenbrunner writes:
>> * borka.postgresql.org - official tarball and docs build server, the
>> upgrade will upgrade the toolchain on that box to the respective
>> versions of what is in jessie. If people think it is