Re: Remaining items for 8.4 (was Re: [HACKERS] Updates of SE-PostgreSQL 8.4devel patches (r1710))

2009-03-17 Thread Heikki Linnakangas
Koichi Suzuki wrote: I believe all the issues pointed out in http://archives.postgresql.org//pgsql-hackers/2008-10/msg01387.php as been covered in the current patch, as discussed with Simon. I also understand that we're running out of time. I pointed out a few more issues here:

Re: Remaining items for 8.4 (was Re: [HACKERS] Updates of SE-PostgreSQL 8.4devel patches (r1710))

2009-03-17 Thread Koichi Suzuki
Sorry I see the comment. I'll continue the work to fulfill the comment. 2009/3/17 Heikki Linnakangas heikki.linnakan...@enterprisedb.com: Koichi Suzuki wrote: I believe all the issues pointed out in http://archives.postgresql.org//pgsql-hackers/2008-10/msg01387.php as been covered in the

Re: Remaining items for 8.4 (was Re: [HACKERS] Updates of SE-PostgreSQL 8.4devel patches (r1710))

2009-03-16 Thread Tom Lane
Heikki Linnakangas heikki.linnakan...@enterprisedb.com writes: Improve Performance of Multi-Batch Hash Join for Skewed Data Sets I believe everyone's happy with the performance testing that's been done. Some of the logic ought to be moved to the planner, and maybe there's some other cleanup

Re: Remaining items for 8.4 (was Re: [HACKERS] Updates of SE-PostgreSQL 8.4devel patches (r1710))

2009-03-16 Thread Koichi Suzuki
Hi, I believe all the issues pointed out in http://archives.postgresql.org//pgsql-hackers/2008-10/msg01387.php as been covered in the current patch, as discussed with Simon. I also understand that we're running out of time. I'd like to push this to pgFoundry first and then work again together