Applied.
---
On Fri, Nov 30, 2012 at 10:43:29PM -0500, Bruce Momjian wrote:
On Mon, Nov 26, 2012 at 02:43:19PM -0500, Bruce Momjian wrote:
In any event, I think the documentation should caution that the
upgrade
On Mon, Nov 26, 2012 at 02:43:19PM -0500, Bruce Momjian wrote:
In any event, I think the documentation should caution that the
upgrade should not be deemed to be a success until after a system-wide
sync has been done. Even if we use the link rather than copy method,
are we sure that
On Sat, Nov 24, 2012 at 09:42:08PM -0800, Jeff Janes wrote:
On Fri, Nov 23, 2012 at 7:22 PM, Bruce Momjian br...@momjian.us wrote:
On Mon, Nov 19, 2012 at 12:11:26PM -0800, Jeff Janes wrote:
Yes, it is with synchronous_commit=off. (or if it wasn't originally,
it is now, with the same
On Fri, Nov 23, 2012 at 7:22 PM, Bruce Momjian br...@momjian.us wrote:
On Mon, Nov 19, 2012 at 12:11:26PM -0800, Jeff Janes wrote:
Yes, it is with synchronous_commit=off. (or if it wasn't originally,
it is now, with the same result)
Applying your fsync patch does solve the problem for me
On Mon, Nov 19, 2012 at 12:11:26PM -0800, Jeff Janes wrote:
[ Sorry for the delay in replying.]
On Wed, Nov 14, 2012 at 3:55 PM, Bruce Momjian br...@momjian.us wrote:
On Mon, Nov 12, 2012 at 10:29:39AM -0800, Jeff Janes wrote:
Is turning off synchronous_commit enough? What about turning
