timeline garbage in pg_basebackup (was [HACKERS] gcc 4.6 warnings -Wunused-but-set-variable)

2011-04-27 Thread Peter Eisentraut
On tis, 2011-03-29 at 23:48 +0300, Peter Eisentraut wrote: The line I marked in pg_basebackup.c might be an actual problem: It goes through a whole lot to figure out the timeline and then doesn't do anything with it. This hasn't been addressed yet. It doesn't manifest itself as an actual

Re: timeline garbage in pg_basebackup (was [HACKERS] gcc 4.6 warnings -Wunused-but-set-variable)

2011-04-27 Thread Magnus Hagander
On Wed, Apr 27, 2011 at 18:55, Peter Eisentraut pete...@gmx.net wrote: On tis, 2011-03-29 at 23:48 +0300, Peter Eisentraut wrote: The line I marked in pg_basebackup.c might be an actual problem: It goes through a whole lot to figure out the timeline and then doesn't do anything with it. This

Re: timeline garbage in pg_basebackup (was [HACKERS] gcc 4.6 warnings -Wunused-but-set-variable)

2011-04-27 Thread Peter Eisentraut
On ons, 2011-04-27 at 19:17 +0200, Magnus Hagander wrote: On Wed, Apr 27, 2011 at 18:55, Peter Eisentraut pete...@gmx.net wrote: On tis, 2011-03-29 at 23:48 +0300, Peter Eisentraut wrote: The line I marked in pg_basebackup.c might be an actual problem: It goes through a whole lot to figure

Re: timeline garbage in pg_basebackup (was [HACKERS] gcc 4.6 warnings -Wunused-but-set-variable)

2011-04-27 Thread Magnus Hagander
On Wed, Apr 27, 2011 at 20:21, Peter Eisentraut pete...@gmx.net wrote: On ons, 2011-04-27 at 19:17 +0200, Magnus Hagander wrote: On Wed, Apr 27, 2011 at 18:55, Peter Eisentraut pete...@gmx.net wrote: On tis, 2011-03-29 at 23:48 +0300, Peter Eisentraut wrote: The line I marked in