Vince Vielhaber [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
$ psql -?
psql: No match.
Odd --- I get the right thing:
$ psql -?
This is psql, the PostgreSQL interactive terminal.
Usage:
psql [options] [dbname [username]]
Options:
-a Echo all input from script
-A Unaligned table
On Sun, 19 Nov 2000, Tom Lane wrote:
Vince Vielhaber [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
$ psql -?
psql: No match.
Odd --- I get the right thing:
$ psql -?
This is psql, the PostgreSQL interactive terminal.
It has something to do with certain shell's expansion of ? - for the
longest time I'd
It's a shell thing: Vince is running csh (or a derivative thereof)
while Tom (and I) are running some sort of Bourne derived shell.
Vince, try:
psql -\?
Which works more universally.
Ross
On Sun, Nov 19, 2000 at 02:44:01PM -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
Vince Vielhaber [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
If you care about the nitty-gritty details, see
http://www.postgresql.org/cgi/cvsweb.cgi/pgsql/src/backend/utils/fmgr/README
particularly the final section "Telling the difference between old- and
new-style functions".
regards, tom lane
At 17:16 19/11/00 -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
If you care about the nitty-gritty details, see
http://www.postgresql.org/cgi/cvsweb.cgi/pgsql/src/backend/utils/fmgr/README
particularly the final section "Telling the difference between old- and
new-style functions".
There is no mention of the handling
Philip Warner [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
At 17:16 19/11/00 -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
http://www.postgresql.org/cgi/cvsweb.cgi/pgsql/src/backend/utils/fmgr/README
There is no mention of the handling of toasted values for old C functions.
Did you not read to the end?
: To allow old-style dynamic
all you guy unix?
under some shells, both * and ? are expanded to matched file names in current
directory by shell,
for example FreeBSD's csh.
you should use psql -\? to get help screen, this sucks,
"?" shouldn't be used as a help screen argument.
Regards,
XuYifeng
- Original Message
Don Baccus [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
All went well except for a handful of occurances of the following error:
ERROR: SS_finalize_plan: plan shouldn't reference subplan's variable
This is probably my fault --- will look at it.
Appreciate the self-contained example...
Modify locale code to defend against possibility that it was compiled
with an -fsigned-char/-funsigned-char setting opposite to that of libc,
thus breaking the convention that 'undefined' values returned by
localeconv() are represented by CHAR_MAX. It is sheer stupidity that
gcc even has
Hi,
I was looking at the ALTER TABLE DROP CONSTRAINT bit of PostgreSQL, and I
started thinking about trying to implement it (as a bit of mental exercise).
(And because it's highly annoying not being able to remove the damn things!
Please comment on all of this, and tell me if it's going to be
At 21:31 19/11/00 -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
Philip Warner [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
At 17:16 19/11/00 -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
http://www.postgresql.org/cgi/cvsweb.cgi/pgsql/src/backend/utils/fmgr/README
There is no mention of the handling of toasted values for old C functions.
Did you not read
Ok, so with CHECKPOINTS, we could move the offline log files to
somewhere else so that we could archive them, in my
undertstanding. Now question is, how we could recover from disaster
like losing every table files except log files. Can we do this with
WAL? If so, how can we do it?
At 07:05 PM 11/19/00 +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Cam I ask what BAR is ?
Backup and recovery, presumably...
- Don Baccus, Portland OR [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Nature photos, on-line guides, Pacific Northwest
Rare Bird Alert Service and other goodies at
http://donb.photo.net.
13 matches
Mail list logo
