I can reproduce the following behavior with CVS HEAD.
1. Have a process do INSERTs into a table in a tight loop (I've
attached a trivial libpq app that does this)
2. In another session, repeatedly drop and re-create the table
that is being modified
You should see a stre
Neil Conway <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> 1. Have a process do INSERTs into a table in a tight loop (I've
> attached a trivial libpq app that does this)
Sorry, I was evidently a little too quick off the draw. A simple test
app is /really/ attached this time.
-Neil
#include
#include
Neil Conway <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Assuming my analysis is correct, is this a bug?
Yes, though a low-priority one in my mind. There is a TODO item about
it:
* Acquire lock on a relation before building a relcache entry for it
(The TODO item is a bit unspecific though, since the issue her
Rod Taylor wrote:
-- Start of PGP signed section.
> On Sun, 2004-02-15 at 01:34, Neil Conway wrote:
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> > > The capability to move objects to other schemas would be quite
> > > useful.
> >
> > I agree. It's not utterly-trivial to implement (for one thing, you
> > need t
Merlin Moncure wrote:
> Does anybody think there might be some interest in an ISAM driver for
> PostgreSQL? I've written a functional alpha that allows PostgreSQL to
> be a drop in (or as easy as reasonably possible) replacement for an ISAM
> file system driving a COBOL application. It is a STL b
On Tue, 10 Feb 2004, Rodrigo wrote:
> Shridhar Daithankar wrote:
> > Just stumbled upon this. just an FYI,
> >
> > http://www.microsoft.com/sql/yukon/productinfo/top30features.asp
> >
> > Shridhar
>
> From the page:
>
> > A new Snapshot Isolation (SI) level will be provided at the
> > data
Rod Taylor wrote:
and I'm willing to entertain other suggestions.
Very nice, but you missed the most important. Command Tag.
I've had a brief look at this proposal (to allow reporting of the
command tag along with username, database, session cookie etc on each
log line). I'm wondering wh
Tom Lane wrote:
Andrew Dunstan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
andrew=# create table ab$cd$ef (ef$cd$ab text);
CREATE TABLE
andrew=# \d ab$cd$ef
Did not find any relation named "ab$cd$ef".
Hmph. I always thought that "$" was only special at the end of a regex,
but that doesn't seem to be ho
Andrew Dunstan wrote:
> Rod Taylor wrote:
>
> >>and I'm willing to entertain other suggestions.
> >>
> >>
> >
> >Very nice, but you missed the most important. Command Tag.
> >
> >
>
> I've had a brief look at this proposal (to allow reporting of the
> command tag along with username, datab
Title: Message
I am wanting to
fiddle with the latest Win32 stuff, using the Mingw tools.
Is it included in
the current (2-17-04) snapshot?
I did a download of
the tarball and expanded it.
I changed directory
to the /postgresql-snapshot directory and performed a
./configure
configure: c
I am about to redo the patch that would allow tagging of log lines with
info via a printf-style string.
Current plans are to call the config parameter "log_line_info" and
implement the following escapes:
%U = user
%D = database
%T = timestamp
%P = pid
%L = session log line number
%C = sessionid
Andrew Dunstan wrote:
I am about to redo the patch that would allow tagging of log lines with
info via a printf-style string.
Current plans are to call the config parameter "log_line_info" and
implement the following escapes:
%U = user
%D = database
%T = timestamp
%P = pid
%L = session log line
Joshua D. Drake wrote:
> Andrew Dunstan wrote:
> >
> > I am about to redo the patch that would allow tagging of log lines with
> > info via a printf-style string.
> >
> > Current plans are to call the config parameter "log_line_info" and
> > implement the following escapes:
> >
> > %U = user
>
Joshua D. Drake wrote:
Andrew Dunstan wrote:
I am about to redo the patch that would allow tagging of log lines
with info via a printf-style string.
Current plans are to call the config parameter "log_line_info" and
implement the following escapes:
%U = user
%D = database
%T = timestamp
%P
Andrew Dunstan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I am about to redo the patch that would allow tagging of log lines with
> info via a printf-style string.
> Any comments or suggestions before I start?
I think Bruce already applied the previous version of your patch. No
problem with yanking it out f
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Fabrizio Mazzoni asked:
> How can i find out if a prepared statement already exists..? Is there a
> function or a query i can execute ..??
I have not seen an answer to this, and I am curious as well. Anyone?
(Cross-posting to hackers due to
16 matches
Mail list logo
