So what would be your suggestion in order to add this functionality?
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Bruce Momjian
Sent: Sunday, June 05, 2005 3:17 AM
To: Gevik Babakhani
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Org
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Solution proposal f
On 04/06/2005 22:59:19, Gevik babakhani wrote:
> Dear all,
>
> The PostgreSQL Developer Network's Source Browser (beta1) is ready.
>
> If you got the time to check it for a moment, please do not hesitate to send
Firstly, good that you're asking for comments (I assume as an attempt to
work with
Gevik,
I like your idea. I have already checked it out.
Its treeview is really like MSDN's.
Some comments, ideas:
- it would be better if the treeview was
ordered by name
- the current item in the treeview could be
highlighted
- the gutter should have a constant
width
- it would be ple
I'm intending to remove the "planner internal" fields of Query
(base_rel_list et al) and put them into a separate struct along
the lines of
typedef struct PlannerInfo
{
NodeTag type;
Query *parse;/* the Query being planned */
List *base_rel_list;/* list
> > Incidentally I havent seen any objections, if there are none should we
> > go ahead and whip up an email to google? Do we want to run this through
> > the foundation? ISTM we would, though I don't know the full extent of
> > what ramifications that would have.
>
> No, the Foundation wasn't
The code given to implement lo data-type in contrib/lo takes something
like:
insert into a values( lo_import("/home/postgres/LargeObject"));
What i want to do is .. cover this, that is, i mean i should only pass the
filename to the input function. I hope you got my problem. If you know
what I s
Marc G. Fournier wrote:
>
> One concern that was raised off of this list was the steep learning
> curve to start with, to get to the point of beign able to do anything ...
>
> Do we have any 'students' that are already up to speed, enough so that
> they'd be able to accomplish something signifi
Neil Conway <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I was rather disappointed, as I wasn't able to find a clean
> way to get around the problem described in the thread above -- e.g.
> in_info_list and query tree mutators:
> http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-hackers/2005-03/msg00718.php
> How were you th
"Tom Lane" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes
>
> Deletion scans the entries and either deletes the dependent objects or
> raises error. It's not "by hand" particularly, at least not for
> anything outside dependency.c. If you were to write code that deleted
> objects directly without going through the
"Qingqing Zhou" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> The reason I raise this question is because I corrupted pg_trigger by
> concurrently perform drop/create table (with foreign keys).
That should be impossible because drop/create take out locks at the
table level. Can you provide a reproducible test ca
"Tom Lane" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes
>
> That should be impossible because drop/create take out locks at the
> table level. Can you provide a reproducible test case?
>
To reproduce it:
Concurrently execute the following sql script serveral times:
("without oids","tablespace testsp" should be op
"Tom Lane" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes
> "Qingqing Zhou" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > In general, code snippet like this:
>
> > if (hash_search(..., HASH_ENTER, ...) == NULL)
> > action_except_elog__ERROR__;
>
> > are considered unsafe if: (1) the allocation method of the target hash
table
>
"Qingqing Zhou" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I am afraid the problem are not limited to hash_search(). Any code snippet
> are not proteced by critical section like this:
This is not an issue except if the system might actually try to recover;
which is not the case in the postmaster snippet you me
Hi,
i want to know how create relation works and how
the populated relation is stored in the form of pages
and also when a tuple is inserted how page concept
works
in postgress.
S.Nithin.
__
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the b
14 matches
Mail list logo
