On Wed, 27 Jul 2005, Tom Lane wrote:
Gavin Sherry [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I ran across this yesterday on HEAD:
template1=# grant select on foo, foo to swm;
ERROR: tuple already updated by self
Seems to fail similarly in every version back to 7.2; probably further,
but that's all I
On Wed, 2005-07-27 at 19:09 -0400, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
On Wed, Jul 27, 2005 at 11:41:24PM +0100, Simon Riggs wrote:
Forgive me if this is wrong, but I took that Alvaro was applying a
reductio ad absurdum argument (i.e. taking the piss). I laughed
heartily at the thought of LAZY becoming
-Original Message-
From: Bruce Momjian [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 28 July 2005 02:39
To: Dave Page
Cc: PostgreSQL-development
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] --enable-thread-safety on Win32
Dave Page wrote:
Did anyone get a chance to think about this? I'd like to
fix this for
Alvaro Herrera [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Why does the sanity check test start with a VACUUM? Why not a VACUUM
FULL?
The test predates the existence of VACUUM FULL ;-); so that's what it
did originally. I think I deliberately left it as-is during the 7.2
devel cycle, so that the new
I ran a wal_buffer test series. It appears that increasing the
wal_buffers is indeed very important for OLTP applications,
potentially resulting in as much as a 15% average increase in
transaction processing.
What's interesting is that this is not just true for 8.1, it's true
for
On Wednesday 20 July 2005 21:27, Marc G. Fournier wrote:
On Wed, 20 Jul 2005, Tom Lane wrote:
Marc G. Fournier [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Wed, 20 Jul 2005, Tom Lane wrote:
Fixed --- but maybe we ought to do something to test the
INSTALL/HISTORY documentation build as well as the main
Josh Berkus josh@agliodbs.com writes:
Folks,
I ran a wal_buffer test series. It appears that increasing the
wal_buffers is indeed very important for OLTP applications, potentially
resulting in as much as a 15% average increase in transaction processing.
What's interesting is that
It is the only one that currently appears to _for this bug_.
Kevin
- Original Message -
From: Andrew Dunstan [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org
Sent: Wednesday, July 27, 2005 11:57 AM
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] RESULT_OID Bug
Andrew - Supernews
-Original Message-
From: Bruce Momjian [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 28 July 2005 14:29
To: Dave Page
Cc: PostgreSQL-development
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] --enable-thread-safety on Win32
Dave Page wrote:
-Original Message-
From: Bruce Momjian [mailto:[EMAIL
Dave Page wrote:
-Original Message-
From: Bruce Momjian [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 28 July 2005 02:39
To: Dave Page
Cc: PostgreSQL-development
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] --enable-thread-safety on Win32
Dave Page wrote:
Did anyone get a chance to think about this?
Dave Page dpage@vale-housing.co.uk writes:
From: Bruce Momjian [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
I would like to see how hard it would be to
add #ifdefs to get the test program to run on Win32.
I did manage to get it to compile (though not work fully just yet),
however I had to use the full
Tom Lane wrote:
Dave Page dpage@vale-housing.co.uk writes:
From: Bruce Momjian [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
I would like to see how hard it would be to
add #ifdefs to get the test program to run on Win32.
I did manage to get it to compile (though not work fully just yet),
however I had
-Original Message-
From: Bruce Momjian [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 28 July 2005 16:08
To: Tom Lane
Cc: Dave Page; PostgreSQL-development
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] --enable-thread-safety on Win32
Tom Lane wrote:
Dave Page dpage@vale-housing.co.uk writes:
From: Bruce
On Tue, Jul 26, 2005 at 08:24:02PM -0300, Tom Lane wrote:
Basic documentation for ROLEs. The user-manag chapter still needs to
be rewritten, but at least the reference pages are reasonably sane.
I just noticed the createuser and dropuser pages may need
adjustments as well ... are you still
Brook,
I have a lot of shell scripts that run as cron jobs and have considered
this option. However, if you look at it carefully, SQL is totally
different from say perl, php, bash, etc. for scripts which execute from
the shell. Tom is right, it is much more valuable and supportable to
call
On 7/28/05, Neil Conway [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Tom Lane wrote: How about list_append_distinct and list_concat_distinct?Those names are fine with me.
list_append_unique and list_concat_unique might be a little clearer, unless you want to retain the sqlism of distinct.
I'm testing out the latest version of Palles ICU patch on win32, and I
got the build syste mworking. But it no longer works when built - it
used to...
When initdb:ing with this version and -E UNICODE, I get:
WARNING: detected write past chunk end in Analyze Column 01472ED0
Any ideas on how to
Alvaro Herrera [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I just noticed the createuser and dropuser pages may need
adjustments as well ... are you still working on this?
The programs themselves need adjustment, too :-(. I have a TODO note
to look at them, but would be grateful if someone else could take a
On Thu, Jul 28, 2005 at 07:51:02PM +0200, Magnus Hagander wrote:
I'm testing out the latest version of Palles ICU patch on win32, and I
got the build syste mworking. But it no longer works when built - it
used to...
When initdb:ing with this version and -E UNICODE, I get:
WARNING: detected
On Thu, Jul 28, 2005 at 01:59:10PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
Alvaro Herrera [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I just noticed the createuser and dropuser pages may need
adjustments as well ... are you still working on this?
The programs themselves need adjustment, too :-(. I have a TODO note
to look
Alvaro Herrera [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Would you post your whole to-do list for roles?
This is more or less verbatim (now you know what kind of notes I keep):
Do we want ROLE to be GUC_REPORT?
Should RESET ALL reset ROLE??
Got some problems with rolling back SET SESSION AUTH (won't
Thomas Swan [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On 7/28/05, Neil Conway [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Tom Lane wrote:
How about list_append_distinct and list_concat_distinct?
Those names are fine with me.
list_append_unique and list_concat_unique might be a little clearer, unless
you want to retain the
Greg,
You have wal_buffer set to 2048? That's pretty radical compared to the
default of just 5. Your tests shows you had to go to this large a value
to see the maximum effect?
No, take a look at the graph. It looks like we got the maximum effect
from a wal_buffers somewhere between 64 and
On Wed, Jul 27, 2005 at 09:31:39PM -0700, Mark Wong wrote:
After seeing the discussion about how bad the disk performance is with a
lot of scsi controllers on linux, I'm wondering if we should run some
disk tests to see how things look.
I'd be very interested to see how FreeBSD compares to
On Wed, Jul 27, 2005 at 07:32:34PM -0700, Josh Berkus wrote:
This 4-way has 8GB of memory and four Adaptec 2200s controllers attached
to 80 spindles (eight 10-disk arrays). For those familiar with the
schema, here is a visual of the disk layout:
On Thu, Jul 28, 2005 at 05:14:41PM -0500, Jim C. Nasby wrote:
On Wed, Jul 27, 2005 at 09:31:39PM -0700, Mark Wong wrote:
After seeing the discussion about how bad the disk performance is with a
lot of scsi controllers on linux, I'm wondering if we should run some
disk tests to see how
Chris Browne [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
create or replace function build_table (integer) returns integer as '
begin
execute ''copy foo to stdout;'';
return 1;
end' language plpgsql;
The result:
/* [EMAIL PROTECTED]/dba2 in=*/ select try_copy(1);
ERROR: unexpected error -2 in EXECUTE
Title: Re: [pgsql-advocacy] MySQL to PostgreSQL, was ENUM type
At EnterpriseDB we're doing a
little project along these lines. In our lab, and soon for our
company, we are running SugarCRM on EDB-Postgres. Alas you say, but
SugarCRM only supports MySQL:
EDB ships a nifty java based ETL
On Thu, 28 Jul 2005 17:19:34 -0500
Jim C. Nasby [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, Jul 28, 2005 at 05:14:41PM -0500, Jim C. Nasby wrote:
On Wed, Jul 27, 2005 at 09:31:39PM -0700, Mark Wong wrote:
After seeing the discussion about how bad the disk performance is with a
lot of scsi
On Thu, 28 Jul 2005 17:17:25 -0500
Jim C. Nasby [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, Jul 27, 2005 at 07:32:34PM -0700, Josh Berkus wrote:
This 4-way has 8GB of memory and four Adaptec 2200s controllers attached
to 80 spindles (eight 10-disk arrays). For those familiar with the
schema, here
On Thu, Jul 28, 2005 at 04:15:31PM -0700, Mark Wong wrote:
On Thu, 28 Jul 2005 17:17:25 -0500
Jim C. Nasby [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, Jul 27, 2005 at 07:32:34PM -0700, Josh Berkus wrote:
This 4-way has 8GB of memory and four Adaptec 2200s controllers attached
to 80 spindles
On Thu, 28 Jul 2005 18:48:09 -0500
Jim C. Nasby [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, Jul 28, 2005 at 04:15:31PM -0700, Mark Wong wrote:
On Thu, 28 Jul 2005 17:17:25 -0500
Jim C. Nasby [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, Jul 27, 2005 at 07:32:34PM -0700, Josh Berkus wrote:
This 4-way has
The following query doesn't return the version of PostgreSQL currently
running, but rather the version of initdb that initialized the cluster:
SELECT character_value
FROM information_schema.sql_implementation_info
WHERE implementation_info_name = 'DBMS VERSION';
Is that the intended or desired
Tom Lane [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes
WARNING: relation t1 page 196 is uninitialized --- fixing
TRAP: FailedAssertion(!PageHeader) ((PageHeader)
pageHeader))-pd_upper == 0)), File: hio.c, Line: 263)
LOG: server process (PID 11296) was terminated by signal 6
Inspired by this, can we put an
Michael Fuhr [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
The following query doesn't return the version of PostgreSQL currently
running, but rather the version of initdb that initialized the cluster:
SELECT character_value
FROM information_schema.sql_implementation_info
WHERE implementation_info_name = 'DBMS
35 matches
Mail list logo
