On Fri, 2006-11-10 at 23:31 -0600, Jim C. Nasby wrote:
> BTW, does make check log it's initdb output anywhere? It'd be handy if
> it did...
They are logged in src/test/regress/log/initdb.log
but the make check failure message gives a relative filename, so you
have to know what the upper part of t
The recent discussion on the proposed HOT scheme has reminded me of a
question I meant to ask about TOASTing when it was introduced back in 7.1(?)
If I have a table something like: (id, status, big_text) and just update
the "status" column on a row, do I have two copies of "big_text" TOASTED
o
Simon Riggs wrote:
> On Fri, 2006-11-10 at 23:31 -0600, Jim C. Nasby wrote:
>
>> BTW, does make check log it's initdb output anywhere? It'd be handy if
>> it did...
>
> They are logged in src/test/regress/log/initdb.log
> but the make check failure message gives a relative filename, so you
> have t
Hello,
As some of you already know, I have been working on multiple postmaster
+ RPM issue for some time. We are approaching 8.2.0, and I still could
not complete this.
Also, I'm having problems with my eyes which prevents me working (for
long hours) (Vision Fatigue); so I want to give up this i
On 2006-11-11, Richard Huxton wrote:
> The recent discussion on the proposed HOT scheme has reminded me of a
> question I meant to ask about TOASTing when it was introduced back in 7.1(?)
>
> If I have a table something like: (id, status, big_text) and just update
> the "status" column on a row,
Dave Cramer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> This is a server bug, I will post to hackers for you, it has little
> to do with JDBC, however the ? can't be a column in a prepared statement
I cannot reproduce any problem using what I think is equivalent in libpq:
/* Here is our out-of-line param
Toru SHIMOGAKI <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> + if (numchecks == 0x7FFF)
> + ereport(ERROR,
> +
> (errcode(ERRCODE_PROGRAM_LIMIT_EXCEEDED),
> + errmsg("cannot have more than 2^15-1 checks in a
> table")));
W
