[HACKERS] ecpg test runs out of disk space

2007-05-27 Thread Jim C. Nasby
Just had a rather disturbing event happen on platypus.. [EMAIL PROTECTED]:07]~/buildfarm/HEAD/pgsql.39276/src/interfaces/ecpg/test/results:271>ll preproc-variable.* -rw-r--r-- 1 buildfarm decibel 6328 May 26 23:42 preproc-variable.c -rw-r--r-- 1 buildfarm decibel 76460670919 May 27

Re: [HACKERS] buildfarm failures after pgstat patch

2007-05-27 Thread Michael Meskes
On Sun, May 27, 2007 at 01:45:45AM -0400, Tom Lane wrote: > Yeah, just saw that myself. Fixed the backend-side problem, but it > would be interesting to find out what ECPG is doing that wasn't exposed > by the core regression tests ... maybe we need another regression test. Don't see anything tha

Re: [HACKERS] ecpg test runs out of disk space

2007-05-27 Thread Michael Meskes
On Sun, May 27, 2007 at 03:18:36AM -0500, Jim C. Nasby wrote: > Just had a rather disturbing event happen on platypus.. Should be fixed now. Michael -- Michael Meskes Email: Michael at Fam-Meskes dot De, Michael at Meskes dot (De|Com|Net|Org) ICQ: 179140304, AIM/Yahoo: michaelmeskes, Jabber: [EM

Re: [HACKERS] Prepare/Declare

2007-05-27 Thread Michael Meskes
On Thu, May 24, 2007 at 04:07:27PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote: > Michael Meskes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > PREPARE p AS > > SELECT * FROM foo; > > DECLARE c CURSOR for p; > > > AFAIRC the standard says this group of statements are perfectly legal > > I'd be interested to see where you draw th

Re: [HACKERS] Prepare/Declare

2007-05-27 Thread Tom Lane
Michael Meskes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On Thu, May 24, 2007 at 04:07:27PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote: >> I'd be interested to see where you draw that conclusion, since >> (a) PREPARE statements of that form are not in the standard, and >> (b) DECLARE CURSOR is clearly defined as taking a . > Sorr

Re: [HACKERS] buildfarm failures after pgstat patch

2007-05-27 Thread Tom Lane
Michael Meskes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On Sun, May 27, 2007 at 01:45:45AM -0400, Tom Lane wrote: >> Yeah, just saw that myself. Fixed the backend-side problem, but it >> would be interesting to find out what ECPG is doing that wasn't exposed >> by the core regression tests ... maybe we need

Re: [HACKERS] Reviewing temp_tablespaces GUC patch

2007-05-27 Thread Robert Treat
On Friday 25 May 2007 12:39, Jaime Casanova wrote: > On 5/25/07, Tom Lane <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Bernd Helmle <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > --On Freitag, Mai 25, 2007 10:49:29 + Jaime Casanova > > > > > > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > >> No, because the RemovePgTempFiles() call in