Re: [HACKERS] performance-test farm

2011-05-11 Thread Josh Berkus
Guys, There are two mutually exclusive problems to solve with a performance-test farm. The first problem is plaform performance, which would be a matter of expanding the buildfarm to include a small set of performance tests ... probably ones based on previously known problems, plus some other

Re: [HACKERS] performance-test farm

2011-05-11 Thread Stephen Frost
* Josh Berkus (j...@agliodbs.com) wrote: The first problem is plaform performance, which would be a matter of expanding the buildfarm to include a small set of performance tests ... probably ones based on previously known problems, plus some other simple common operations. The goal here would

Re: [HACKERS] Standbys which don't synch to disk?

2011-05-11 Thread Fujii Masao
On Thu, May 12, 2011 at 3:48 AM, Josh Berkus j...@agliodbs.com wrote: Robert, That WAL has effectively disappeared from the master, but is still present on the slave.  Now the master comes up and starts processing read-write transactions again, and generates a new and different 1kB of

Re: [HACKERS] Extension Packaging

2011-05-11 Thread David E. Wheeler
On May 11, 2011, at 2:47 PM, Robert Haas wrote: Okay, how we add a revision key to the control file and extrevision to the pg_extension catalog. Its type can be TEXT and is optional for use by extensions. This would allow extension authors to identify the base version of an extension

Re: [HACKERS] Extension Packaging

2011-05-11 Thread Robert Haas
On Wed, May 11, 2011 at 10:48 PM, David E. Wheeler da...@kineticode.com wrote: On May 11, 2011, at 2:47 PM, Robert Haas wrote: Okay, how we add a revision key to the control file and extrevision to the pg_extension catalog. Its type can be TEXT and is optional for use by extensions. This

Re: [HACKERS] pg_upgrade and PGPORT

2011-05-11 Thread Peter Eisentraut
On ons, 2011-05-11 at 18:36 -0400, Bruce Momjian wrote: Robert Haas wrote: On Wed, May 11, 2011 at 2:18 PM, Tom Lane t...@sss.pgh.pa.us wrote: Or you could just unsetenv instead of complaining. +1 for that. OK, the attached patch does this, but allows PGCLIENTENCODING to be passed

<    1   2