On Wed, May 18, 2011 at 04:02:59PM +0100, Leonardo Francalanci wrote:
By the time the startup process
releases the AccessExclusiveLock acquired by the proposed
UNLOGGED - normal conversion process, that relfilenode
needs to be either fully copied or unlinked all over again.
On Wed, May 18, 2011 at 3:37 PM, Magnus Hagander mag...@hagander.net wrote:
On Wed, May 18, 2011 at 15:29, Marko Kreen mark...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, May 18, 2011 at 2:57 PM, Magnus Hagander mag...@hagander.net wrote:
On Wed, May 18, 2011 at 10:25, Greg Smith g...@2ndquadrant.com wrote:
Some
2011/5/19 Robert Haas robertmh...@gmail.com:
On Tue, May 17, 2011 at 6:11 PM, Cédric Villemain
cedric.villemain.deb...@gmail.com wrote:
The point is to get ratio in cache, not the distribution of the data
in cache (pgfincore also allows you to see this information).
I don't see how a stable
On Thu, May 19, 2011 at 8:19 AM, Cédric Villemain
cedric.villemain.deb...@gmail.com wrote:
2011/5/19 Robert Haas robertmh...@gmail.com:
On Tue, May 17, 2011 at 6:11 PM, Cédric Villemain
cedric.villemain.deb...@gmail.com wrote:
The point is to get ratio in cache, not the distribution of the
On Wed, May 18, 2011 at 8:20 PM, Alvaro Herrera
alvhe...@commandprompt.com wrote:
Excerpts from Greg Smith's message of mié may 18 23:07:13 -0400 2011:
Two things that could be changed from this example to make it more useful:
-The default database is based on your user name, which is postgres
On Thu, May 19, 2011 at 2:44 PM, Selena Deckelmann sel...@chesnok.com wrote:
On Wed, May 18, 2011 at 8:20 PM, Alvaro Herrera
alvhe...@commandprompt.com wrote:
Excerpts from Greg Smith's message of mié may 18 23:07:13 -0400 2011:
Two things that could be changed from this example to make it
On Thu, May 19, 2011 at 01:52:46PM +0100, Leonardo Francalanci wrote:
I'd guess some WAL record arising from the post-crash master restart makes
the
standby do so. When a crash isn't involved, the commit or abort record is
that
signal. You could test and find out how it happens
On Thu, May 19, 2011 at 11:13 AM, Noah Misch n...@leadboat.com wrote:
It would solve the problem, but it would mean resetting unlogged relations on
the standby at every shutdown checkpoint. That's probably not a performance
problem, but it is a hack.
I haven't thought about this too deeply,
On Wed, May 18, 2011 at 9:11 AM, Leonardo Francalanci m_li...@yahoo.it wrote:
this is a second version: now using
int counts[1]; /* variable-length array of counts */
in xl_xact_commit to keep track of number of
different arrays at the end of the struct.
Waiting for
On Tue, May 10, 2011 at 6:21 AM, Mark marek.bal...@seznam.cz wrote:
Could somebody explain me on which methods is based ts_rank and how it works?
I would appreciate some articles, if exist.
Thanks a lot for reply.
As far as I can tell, our documentation contains no useful information
on this
On Thu, Apr 7, 2011 at 1:36 AM, Tom Lane t...@sss.pgh.pa.us wrote:
Robert Haas robertmh...@gmail.com writes:
If you have the timezone configured to a non-default value in
postgresql.conf, and you comment it out and reload, it says:
LOG: parameter TimeZone removed from configuration file,
Robert Haas robertmh...@gmail.com writes:
So I think you whacked this around some more to get a *somewhat* more
sensible behavior, but ISTM that the behavior here still not really
right. Should we select a timezone at startup time even if we don't
immediately need it, so that this can work
A user at Pgcon made a pretty convincing case that it would sometimes
be handy to be able to see a list of columns in alphabetical order in
psql's \dt output. This is especially true when there are a very large
number of columns and you're looking for a specific column with name
matching some
On Sun, May 8, 2011 at 8:31 PM, Dan Ports d...@csail.mit.edu wrote:
On Fri, May 06, 2011 at 10:49:22PM -0400, Dan Ports wrote:
Will update the patch.
Updated patch (in response to Robert's comments) attached.
Committed.
--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise
On Thu, May 19, 2011 at 12:12 PM, Tom Lane t...@sss.pgh.pa.us wrote:
Robert Haas robertmh...@gmail.com writes:
So I think you whacked this around some more to get a *somewhat* more
sensible behavior, but ISTM that the behavior here still not really
right. Should we select a timezone at
On Thu, May 19, 2011 10:32 am, Robert Haas wrote:
2011/5/16 MauMau maumau...@gmail.com:
Can't open perl script make-errcodes-table.pl: No such file or
directory
I think this is the root of the problem. We have no script called
make-errcodes-table.pl. Can you try changing it to
Robert Haas robertmh...@gmail.com writes:
On Thu, May 19, 2011 at 12:12 PM, Tom Lane t...@sss.pgh.pa.us wrote:
We could do that, but the issue that this code is trying to avoid is
that identify_system_timezone can easily add several seconds to the
postmaster startup time. So one of the
Excerpts from Greg Stark's message of jue may 19 12:11:29 -0400 2011:
A user at Pgcon made a pretty convincing case that it would sometimes
be handy to be able to see a list of columns in alphabetical order in
psql's \dt output. This is especially true when there are a very large
number of
Excerpts from Robert Haas's message of jue may 19 10:18:20 -0400 2011:
On Wed, May 18, 2011 at 7:11 PM, Alvaro Herrera
alvhe...@commandprompt.com wrote:
1. I suggested that this looks a lot like the controls of pg_hba.conf
When our DBAs are doing major management of replication, they are
Alvaro Herrera alvhe...@commandprompt.com writes:
Excerpts from Robert Haas's message of jue may 19 10:18:20 -0400 2011:
Second, it relies on the fact that a new connection briefly grabs a
lock on the database that is then released.
Yes. This is well known and it's not going away.
If we
I just noticed that logging_collector does not have its default value
documented. I checked and other settings were also missing defaults.
Do we have a policy that they should all be documented, or is this
intentional?
--
Álvaro Herrera alvhe...@alvh.no-ip.org
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers
Alvaro Herrera alvhe...@alvh.no-ip.org writes:
I just noticed that logging_collector does not have its default value
documented. I checked and other settings were also missing defaults.
Do we have a policy that they should all be documented, or is this
intentional?
I think if the default
Excerpts from Tom Lane's message of jue may 19 13:34:13 -0400 2011:
Alvaro Herrera alvhe...@commandprompt.com writes:
Excerpts from Robert Haas's message of jue may 19 10:18:20 -0400 2011:
Second, it relies on the fact that a new connection briefly grabs a
lock on the database that is then
* Alvaro Herrera (alvhe...@commandprompt.com) wrote:
Excerpts from Greg Stark's message of jue may 19 12:11:29 -0400 2011:
Adding such a feature would be pretty trivial, attached is a patch.
Interesting, but not so trivial I think -- I mean if you're doing this I
think you should add a
Alvaro Herrera alvhe...@commandprompt.com writes:
Excerpts from Tom Lane's message of jue may 19 13:34:13 -0400 2011:
I can't see getting rid of that lock, since we'd simply have to invent
some other interlock for new connections vs. DROP DATABASE. However,
I do think that we might sometime
* Greg Stark (st...@mit.edu) wrote:
Adding such a feature would be pretty trivial, attached is a patch.
Quick code-only review: sortedAttrs is a horrible var name for what it
is. More like 'sortbyName' would make more sense, at least to me.
Also, no regression test..? :) The interface looks
Excerpts from Stephen Frost's message of jue may 19 13:49:33 -0400 2011:
* Alvaro Herrera (alvhe...@commandprompt.com) wrote:
Excerpts from Greg Stark's message of jue may 19 12:11:29 -0400 2011:
Adding such a feature would be pretty trivial, attached is a patch.
Interesting, but not so
On Thu, May 19, 2011 at 12:57 PM, Alvaro Herrera
alvhe...@commandprompt.com wrote:
Excerpts from Robert Haas's message of jue may 19 10:18:20 -0400 2011:
On Wed, May 18, 2011 at 7:11 PM, Alvaro Herrera
alvhe...@commandprompt.com wrote:
1. I suggested that this looks a lot like the controls
On Thu, May 19, 2011 at 11:09, Dave Page dp...@pgadmin.org wrote:
On Thu, May 19, 2011 at 2:44 PM, Selena Deckelmann sel...@chesnok.com wrote:
On Wed, May 18, 2011 at 8:20 PM, Alvaro Herrera
alvhe...@commandprompt.com wrote:
Excerpts from Greg Smith's message of mié may 18 23:07:13 -0400 2011:
On Thu, May 19, 2011 at 1:53 PM, Stephen Frost sfr...@snowman.net wrote:
Quick code-only review: sortedAttrs is a horrible var name for what it
is. More like 'sortbyName' would make more sense, at least to me.
Also, no regression test..? :)
Do we have regression tests for psql \ commands?
--
* Greg Stark (st...@mit.edu) wrote:
On Thu, May 19, 2011 at 1:53 PM, Stephen Frost sfr...@snowman.net wrote:
Quick code-only review: sortedAttrs is a horrible var name for what it
is. More like 'sortbyName' would make more sense, at least to me.
Also, no regression test..? :)
Do we have
Is there a reason we don't allow moving the toast table to a separate
tablespace, other than unimplemented feature? If not, I propose such a
syntax as
ALTER TABLE foo SET TOAST TABLESPACE bar;
--
Álvaro Herrera alvhe...@alvh.no-ip.org
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list
On Thu, May 19, 2011 at 11:42:03AM -0400, Robert Haas wrote:
On Thu, May 19, 2011 at 11:13 AM, Noah Misch n...@leadboat.com wrote:
It would solve the problem, but it would mean resetting unlogged relations
on
the standby at every shutdown checkpoint. ?That's probably not a performance
On Thu, May 19, 2011 at 1:48 PM, Alvaro Herrera
alvhe...@commandprompt.com wrote:
I can't see getting rid of that lock, since we'd simply have to invent
some other interlock for new connections vs. DROP DATABASE. However,
I do think that we might sometime need to convert it to a session lock
On Thu, May 19, 2011 at 3:24 PM, Noah Misch n...@leadboat.com wrote:
On Thu, May 19, 2011 at 11:42:03AM -0400, Robert Haas wrote:
On Thu, May 19, 2011 at 11:13 AM, Noah Misch n...@leadboat.com wrote:
It would solve the problem, but it would mean resetting unlogged relations
on
the standby
On Thu, May 19, 2011 at 3:17 PM, Alvaro Herrera alvhe...@alvh.no-ip.org wrote:
Is there a reason we don't allow moving the toast table to a separate
tablespace, other than unimplemented feature? If not, I propose such a
syntax as
ALTER TABLE foo SET TOAST TABLESPACE bar;
Off the top of my
Apparently, you can write this (an attempt at a convenient workaround
for lack of functional dependency tracking pre-9.1):
SELECT pg_class.* FROM pg_class GROUP BY pg_class.*;
It won't work:
ERROR: 42803: column pg_class.relname must appear in the GROUP BY clause or
be used in an aggregate
Excerpts from Robert Haas's message of jue may 19 15:32:57 -0400 2011:
On Thu, May 19, 2011 at 1:48 PM, Alvaro Herrera
The following things acquire a lock on database:
ALTER DATABASE SET
ALTER DATABASE OWNER
COMMENT ON DATABASE
So as far as features that would cause a problem if
On Thu, May 19, 2011 at 03:53:12PM -0400, Robert Haas wrote:
On Thu, May 19, 2011 at 3:24 PM, Noah Misch n...@leadboat.com wrote:
On Thu, May 19, 2011 at 11:42:03AM -0400, Robert Haas wrote:
On Thu, May 19, 2011 at 11:13 AM, Noah Misch n...@leadboat.com wrote:
It would solve the problem,
There is no way to tell pg_basebackup to just compress the thing in a
default way. You have to pick some number and then write -Z8 or
something. I suppose that interface was copied from pg_dump, but there
it's not that commonly used because the right formats are compressed by
default.
I suggest
2011/5/19 Robert Haas robertmh...@gmail.com:
On Thu, May 19, 2011 at 8:19 AM, Cédric Villemain
cedric.villemain.deb...@gmail.com wrote:
2011/5/19 Robert Haas robertmh...@gmail.com:
On Tue, May 17, 2011 at 6:11 PM, Cédric Villemain
cedric.villemain.deb...@gmail.com wrote:
The point is to get
From: Andrew Dunstan and...@dunslane.net
On Thu, May 19, 2011 10:32 am, Robert Haas wrote:
2011/5/16 MauMau maumau...@gmail.com:
Can't open perl script make-errcodes-table.pl: No such file or
directory
I think this is the root of the problem. We have no script called
make-errcodes-table.pl.
On Thu, May 19, 2011 at 10:26 AM, Robert Haas robertmh...@gmail.com wrote:
At the risk of opening a can of worms, if we're going to fix \dd,
shouldn't we fix it completely, and include comments on ALL the object
types that can have them? IIRC it's missing a bunch, not just
constraints.
You
Robert Haas wrote:
Mark wrote:
Could somebody explain me on which methods is based ts_rank and
how it works? I would appreciate some articles, if exist.
As far as I can tell, our documentation contains no useful
information on this topic whatsoever. :-(
There's some potentially
On 19 May 2011 15:33, Robert Haas robertmh...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, May 17, 2011 at 2:44 PM, Dean Rasheed dean.a.rash...@gmail.com
wrote:
The algorithm for this was discussed in the original thread
(http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-hackers/2010-10/msg02050.php)
but I don't that think
45 matches
Mail list logo
