Alvaro Herrera alvhe...@commandprompt.com writes:
I'm sorry, but the releases are already tagged :-( So they will contain
the buggy output for a while yet.
Ah, I see, ok, wait next! :)
--
Sergey Burladyan
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make
On Sat, Feb 25, 2012 at 00:45, Tom Lane t...@sss.pgh.pa.us wrote:
Alvaro Herrera alvhe...@commandprompt.com writes:
Excerpts from Bruce Momjian's message of vie feb 24 19:19:10 -0300 2012:
In looking over our authentication code, I noticed that we create the
child process before we check any
On 24 February 2012 23:43, Thom Brown t...@linux.com wrote:
On 24 February 2012 23:01, Thom Brown t...@linux.com wrote:
On 24 February 2012 22:39, Thom Brown t...@linux.com wrote:
On 24 February 2012 22:32, Thom Brown t...@linux.com wrote:
On 24 February 2012 22:04, Dimitri Fontaine
On 25 February 2012 12:00, Dimitri Fontaine dimi...@2ndquadrant.fr wrote:
D'oh, just as I sent some more queries...
Thom Brown t...@linux.com writes:
Is there any reason why the list of commands that command triggers can
be used with isn't in alphabetical order? Also it appears to show
Any
On Fri, Feb 10, 2012 at 09:32, Fujii Masao masao.fu...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Feb 10, 2012 at 7:00 AM, Euler Taveira de Oliveira
eu...@timbira.com wrote:
On 08-02-2012 09:35, Fujii Masao wrote:
Fujii, new patch attached. Thanks for your tests.
Thanks for the new patch!
But another
On 25 February 2012 12:07, Thom Brown t...@linux.com wrote:
On 25 February 2012 12:00, Dimitri Fontaine dimi...@2ndquadrant.fr wrote:
D'oh, just as I sent some more queries...
Thom Brown t...@linux.com writes:
Is there any reason why the list of commands that command triggers can
be used
I've asked for this a few times before, but it seems others aren't as
keen on it as me :-) Personally, I find the docs easier to read when
formatted with the new website styles that Thom put together, and I
also like to see things the way they're going to look when they go up
there.
Attached
2012/2/25 Magnus Hagander mag...@hagander.net:
I've asked for this a few times before, but it seems others aren't as
keen on it as me :-) Personally, I find the docs easier to read when
formatted with the new website styles that Thom put together, and I
also like to see things the way they're
On 25 February 2012 12:42, Thom Brown t...@linux.com wrote:
On 25 February 2012 12:07, Thom Brown t...@linux.com wrote:
On 25 February 2012 12:00, Dimitri Fontaine dimi...@2ndquadrant.fr wrote:
D'oh, just as I sent some more queries...
Thom Brown t...@linux.com writes:
Is there any reason
Re: Peter Eisentraut 2012-02-24 1330107599.32452.15.ca...@vanquo.pezone.net
On fre, 2012-02-24 at 11:53 -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
We have the same problem with testing extensions at build-time in
the
Debian packages. The server's SHAREDIR /usr/share/postgresql/... is
only writable by
On 25 February 2012 13:15, Thom Brown t...@linux.com wrote:
On 25 February 2012 12:42, Thom Brown t...@linux.com wrote:
On 25 February 2012 12:07, Thom Brown t...@linux.com wrote:
On 25 February 2012 12:00, Dimitri Fontaine dimi...@2ndquadrant.fr wrote:
D'oh, just as I sent some more
On 25 February 2012 13:28, Thom Brown t...@linux.com wrote:
On 25 February 2012 13:15, Thom Brown t...@linux.com wrote:
On 25 February 2012 12:42, Thom Brown t...@linux.com wrote:
On 25 February 2012 12:07, Thom Brown t...@linux.com wrote:
On 25 February 2012 12:00, Dimitri Fontaine
On Mon, Jan 16, 2012 at 02:03, Greg Smith g...@2ndquadrant.com wrote:
On 01/15/2012 12:20 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
Please follow the style already used for system catalogs; ie I think
there should be a summary table with one entry per view, and then a
separate description and table-of-columns for
On 25 February 2012 14:30, Thom Brown t...@linux.com wrote:
On 25 February 2012 13:28, Thom Brown t...@linux.com wrote:
On 25 February 2012 13:15, Thom Brown t...@linux.com wrote:
On 25 February 2012 12:42, Thom Brown t...@linux.com wrote:
On 25 February 2012 12:07, Thom Brown t...@linux.com
2012/2/24 Peter Eisentraut pete...@gmx.net:
On fre, 2012-02-10 at 17:44 +0100, Jean-Baptiste Quenot wrote:
Please find attached a patch that solves this issue. Instead of a PG
crash, we get the following message:
ERROR: plpy.Error: no result fetched
Hmm, should it be an error or just
Vik Reykja vikrey...@gmail.com wrote:
Kevin Grittner kevin.gritt...@wicourts.govwrote:
One of the problems that Florian was trying to address is that
people often have a need to enforce something with a lot of
similarity to a foreign key, but with more subtle logic than
declarative foreign
Simon Riggs si...@2ndquadrant.com wrote:
This patch extends that and actually sets the tuple header flag as
HEAP_XMIN_COMMITTED during the load.
Fantastic!
So, without bulk-load conditions, a long-lived tuple in PostgreSQL
is written to disk at least five times[1]:
(1) The WAL record for
On Sat, Feb 25, 2012 at 6:24 PM, Kevin Grittner
kevin.gritt...@wicourts.gov wrote:
Simon Riggs si...@2ndquadrant.com wrote:
This patch extends that and actually sets the tuple header flag as
HEAP_XMIN_COMMITTED during the load.
Fantastic!
So, without bulk-load conditions, a long-lived
On Wed, Feb 8, 2012 at 11:26 PM, Robert Haas robertmh...@gmail.com wrote:
Given that, I obviously cannot test this at this point,
Patch with minor corrections attached here for further review.
but let me go
ahead and theorize about how well it's likely to work. What Tom
suggested before
Le vendredi 24 février 2012 14:18:44, Florian Weimer a écrit :
* Alex Shulgin:
It's ugly, but it's standard practice, and seems better than a separate
-d parameter (which sort of defeats the purpose of URIs).
Hm, do you see anything what's wrong with ?dbname=other if you don't
like a
Le mercredi 22 février 2012 20:12:35, Pavel Stehule a écrit :
2012/2/22 Kevin Grittner kevin.gritt...@wicourts.gov:
Pavel Stehule pavel.steh...@gmail.com wrote:
usual pattern in our application is
create table xx1 as select
analyze xx1
create table xx2 as select from xx1,
On Tue, Feb 21, 2012 at 5:34 PM, Fujii Masao masao.fu...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Feb 21, 2012 at 8:19 PM, Fujii Masao masao.fu...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sat, Feb 18, 2012 at 12:36 AM, Heikki Linnakangas
heikki.linnakan...@enterprisedb.com wrote:
Attached is a new version, fixing that, and
On 14 November 2011 13:07, Thom Brown t...@linux.com wrote:
2011/11/14 Shigeru Hanada shigeru.han...@gmail.com
(2011/11/14 11:25), Robert Haas wrote:
My vote is to nuke 'em all. :-)
+1.
IIRC, main purpose of supporting tableoid for foreign tables was to be
basis of foreign table
On Tue, Feb 14, 2012 at 1:44 AM, Hitoshi Harada umi.tan...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sat, Feb 11, 2012 at 11:34 AM, Jeff Janes jeff.ja...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Feb 8, 2012 at 1:01 AM, Hitoshi Harada umi.tan...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sun, Jan 15, 2012 at 4:59 PM, Jeff Janes jeff.ja...@gmail.com wrote:
On 25-02-2012 09:23, Magnus Hagander wrote:
Do we even *need* the validate_xlog_location() function? If we just
remove those calls, won't we still catch all the incorrectly formatted
ones in the errors of the sscanf() calls? Or am I too deep into
weekend-mode and missing something obvious?
On 25 February 2012 16:36, Thom Brown t...@linux.com wrote:
On 25 February 2012 14:30, Thom Brown t...@linux.com wrote:
On 25 February 2012 13:28, Thom Brown t...@linux.com wrote:
On 25 February 2012 13:15, Thom Brown t...@linux.com wrote:
On 25 February 2012 12:42, Thom Brown t...@linux.com
On Tue, Feb 14, 2012 at 12:25 PM, Greg Smith g...@2ndquadrant.com wrote:
On 02/14/2012 01:45 PM, Greg Smith wrote:
scale=1000, db is 94% of RAM; clients=4
Version TPS
9.0 535
9.1 491 (-8.4% relative to 9.0)
9.2 338 (-31.2% relative to 9.1)
A second pass through this data noted that
On Sun, Feb 12, 2012 at 10:49 PM, Amit Kapila amit.kap...@huawei.com wrote:
Without sorted checkpoints (or some other fancier method) you have to
write out the entire pool before you can do any fsyncs. Or you have
to do multiple fsyncs of the same file, with at least one occurring
after the
I'm working on implementing query cache in pgpool-II. I want to know
if a table has been modified because pgpool-II has to invalidate cache
if corresponding table is modified. For DDL/DML it would be doable
since pgpool-II knows all SQLs sent from clients. Problem is, implicit
table modifications
On 02/25/2012 09:37 PM, Cédric Villemain wrote:
I've not followed all the mails about this feature but I don't find it is a
nice syntax too.
?dbname=other looks like dbname is an argument, but dbname is a requirement
for postgresql connexion.
Ugh, not really. AFAIK, dbname is a connection
30 matches
Mail list logo