What is the current status of FOR UPDATE cursors ?
older docs claim that the syntax is supported, but gives an error
http://www.postgresql.org/docs/8.2/static/sql-declare.html
docs for 9.1 do not have FOR UPDATE in main section
http://www.postgresql.org/docs/9.1/static/sql-declare.html
but the
I think a few more things could removed/simplified after the recent
round of port removal:
- Remove definition of offsetof() in c.h
- (Side point, the definition of endof() in the same place isn't used
anywhere, and doesn't look safe to me, because it can go one past the
end of memory.)
- Remove
Peter Geoghegan writes:
> On 6 May 2012 01:06, Robert Haas wrote:
>> I think we should err on the side of removing less rather than more.
>> It won't hurt anything much to leave these around for another few
>> years.
> I think it's better to force users of platforms like IRIX and BSD/OS,
> platf
Hannu Krosing writes:
> What is the current status of FOR UPDATE cursors ?
Same as it's been for a long time: FOR UPDATE [ OF table_name ]
works fine.
> older docs claim that the syntax is supported, but gives an error
> http://www.postgresql.org/docs/8.2/static/sql-declare.html
Old docs incorr
On Sun, 2012-05-06 at 13:17 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> Hannu Krosing writes:
> > What is the current status of FOR UPDATE cursors ?
>
> Same as it's been for a long time: FOR UPDATE [ OF table_name ]
> works fine.
Ok, then it is just documentation fix
currently it is missing from \h declare and d
