On Wed, 2013-11-20 at 01:08 +0200, Oskari Saarenmaa wrote:
Agreed. Attached an updated patch, or you can grab it from
https://github.com/saaros/postgres/compare/extra-version
Committed.
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your
On 12 Dec 2013 04:20, Álvaro Hernández Tortosa a...@nosys.es wrote:
Thanks, Greg. I've been going through those threads, they are
quite interesting. I didn't find an answer, though, about my question: why
parsing the postgresql.conf (and for instance preserving the comments while
writing
PGCon 2014 will be on 20-24 May 2014 at University of Ottawa.
* 20-21 (Tue-Wed) tutorials
* 22-23 (Thu-Fri) talks - the main part of the conference
* 24 (Sat) The Unconference (very popular in 2013, the first year)
See http://www.pgcon.org/2014/
We are now accepting proposals for the main part
On Dec 12, 2013, at 6:24 PM, Andres Freund and...@2ndquadrant.com wrote:
Is it really a regular pattern like hourly? What's your
checkpoint_segments?
No, it's not a pattern like that; that's an approximation. Sometimes, they
come in clusters, sometimes, 2-3 hours past without one. They
On Dec 12, 2013, at 6:41 PM, Andres Freund and...@2ndquadrant.com wrote:
Christophe: are there any unusual ERROR messages preceding the crash,
possibly some minutes before?
Interestingly, each spinlock PANIC is *followed*, about one minute later (+/-
five seconds) by a canceling statement
On Thu, Dec 12, 2013 at 7:35 PM, Christophe Pettus x...@thebuild.com wrote:
There are a *lot* of canceling statement due to statement timeout messages,
which is interesting, because:
postgres=# show statement_timeout;
statement_timeout
---
0
(1 row)
Couldn't that just
On Fri, Dec 13, 2013 at 12:03 PM, Peter Eisentraut pete...@gmx.net wrote:
On Wed, 2013-11-20 at 01:08 +0200, Oskari Saarenmaa wrote:
Agreed. Attached an updated patch, or you can grab it from
https://github.com/saaros/postgres/compare/extra-version
Committed.
Thanks.
--
Michael
--
Sent
On Dec 12, 2013, at 7:40 PM, Peter Geoghegan p...@heroku.com wrote:
Couldn't that just be the app setting it locally?
Yes, that's what is happening there (I had to check with the client's
developers). It's possible that the one-minute repeat is due to the
application reissuing the query,
On 04 December 2013, Sawada Masahiko Wrote
I attached the patch which have modified based on Robert suggestion,
and fixed typo.
I have reviewed the modified patch and I have some comments..
1. Patch need to be rebased (failed applying on head)
2. crc field should be at end in
On Fri, Dec 13, 2013 at 1:51 PM, Dilip kumar dilip.ku...@huawei.com wrote:
On 04 December 2013, Sawada Masahiko Wrote
I attached the patch which have modified based on Robert suggestion,
and fixed typo.
I have reviewed the modified patch and I have some comments..
1. Patch need to be
On 13/12/13 04:11, Greg Stark wrote:
On 12 Dec 2013 04:20, Álvaro Hernández Tortosa a...@nosys.es
mailto:a...@nosys.es wrote:
Thanks, Greg. I've been going through those threads, they are
quite interesting. I didn't find an answer, though, about my question:
why parsing the
On Thu, Dec 12, 2013 at 12:47 PM, Dev Kumkar devdas.kum...@gmail.comwrote:
+ hackers
On Thu, Dec 12, 2013 at 12:34 PM, Dev Kumkar devdas.kum...@gmail.comwrote:
On Wed, Dec 11, 2013 at 9:47 PM, Dev Kumkar devdas.kum...@gmail.comwrote:
Actually for searches lower will work.
But the other
101 - 112 of 112 matches
Mail list logo
