On Feb 25, 2014, at 1:57 PM, Hannu Krosing wrote:
> It is not in any specs, but nevertheless all major imlementations do it and
> some code depends on it.
I have no doubt that some code depends on it, but "all major implementations"
is too strong a statement. BSON, in particular, does not hav
* Kouhei Kaigai (kai...@ak.jp.nec.com) wrote:
> This regular one means usual tables. Even though custom implementation
> may reference self-managed in-memory cache instead of raw heap, the table
> pointed in user's query shall be a usual table.
> In the past, Hanada-san had proposed an enhancement
On 24 February 2014 16:01, Andres Freund wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I took a quick peek at this, and noticed the following things:
> * I am pretty sure this patch doesn't compile anymore after the latest
> set of releases.
Refreshed to v18, will post shortly.
> * This definitely should include isolation
> * Kouhei Kaigai (kai...@ak.jp.nec.com) wrote:
> > Yes, the part-1 patch provides a set of interface portion to interact
> > between the backend code and extension code. Rest of part-2 and part-3
> > portions are contrib modules that implements its feature on top of
> > custom-scan API.
>
> Just
101 - 104 of 104 matches
Mail list logo
