On Thu, Feb 27, 2014 at 4:14 PM, Christian Kruse
christ...@2ndquadrant.com wrote:
On 25/02/14 16:11, Robert Haas wrote:
Reading this over, I'm not sure I understand why this is a CONTEXT at
all and not just a DETAIL for the particular error message that it's
supposed to be decorating.
Hello
here is a prototype:
bash-4.1$ /usr/local/pgsql/bin/psql --help-variables
List of some variables (options) for use from command line.
Complete list you find in psql section in the PostgreSQL documentation.
psql variables:
Usage:
psql --set=NAME=VALUE
or \set NAME VALUE in interactive
Hello
I was asked, how can be showed only failed queries in psql.
I am thinking, so it is not possible now. But implementation is very simple
What do you think about it?
bash-4.1$ psql postgres -v ECHO=error -f data.sql
INSERT 0 1
Time: 27.735 ms
INSERT 0 1
Time: 8.303 ms
psql:data.sql:3:
KaiGai,
* Kohei KaiGai (kai...@kaigai.gr.jp) wrote:
BTW, this kind of discussion looks like a talk with a ghost because
we cannot see the new interface according to the parallel execution
right now, so we cannot have tangible investigation whether it becomes
really serious backward
Seems that in the review so far, Fabien has focused mainly in the
mathematical properties of the new random number generation. That seems
perfectly fine, but no comment has been made about the chosen UI for the
feature. Per the few initial messages in the thread, in the patch as
submitted you
I didn't check the patch in detail, but it seems to me that both the
encode stuff as well as pgrand belong in src/common rather than
src/port.
--
Álvaro Herrerahttp://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training Services
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers
On Sat, Mar 01, 2014 at 12:48:08PM -0300, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
I didn't check the patch in detail, but it seems to me that both the
encode stuff as well as pgrand belong in src/common rather than
src/port.
Since src/common exists only in 9.3 and up, that would mean putting them in
different
On Mon, Feb 10, 2014 at 1:01 AM, Tom Lane t...@sss.pgh.pa.us wrote:
Alexander Korotkov aekorot...@gmail.com writes:
On Thu, Jan 16, 2014 at 3:34 AM, Tom Lane t...@sss.pgh.pa.us wrote:
I looked at this patch a bit. It seems like this:
+ *BLANK_COLOR_SIZE - How much blank character is
Alvaro Herrera alvhe...@2ndquadrant.com writes:
Seems that in the review so far, Fabien has focused mainly in the
mathematical properties of the new random number generation. That seems
perfectly fine, but no comment has been made about the chosen UI for the
feature. Per the few initial
Status Summary. Needs Review: 36, Waiting on Author: 7, Ready for
Committer: 16, Committed: 43, Returned with Feedback: 8, Rejected: 4.
Total: 114.
We're still on track to achieve about 50% committed patches, which would
be similar to the previous few commit fests. So decent job so far.
Which
=?ISO-8859-1?Q?Fabr=EDzio_de_Royes_Mello?= fabriziome...@gmail.com writes:
On Sat, Jan 18, 2014 at 11:12 PM, Stephen Frost sfr...@snowman.net wrote:
Fabrízio, can you clarify the use-case for things like CREATE AGGREGATE
to have IF NOT EXISTS rather than OR REPLACE, or if there is a reason
why
Noah Misch n...@leadboat.com writes:
As announced with last week's releases, use of trust authentication in the
make check temporary database cluster makes it straightforward to hijack the
OS user account involved. The prerequisite is another user account on the
same system. The solution we
On 03/01/2014 12:29 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
In the case of Unix systems, there is a *far* simpler and more portable
solution technique, which is to tell the test postmaster to put its socket
in some non-world-accessible directory created by the test scaffolding.
+1 - I'm all for KISS.
Of
On Sat, Mar 1, 2014 at 7:09 PM, Andrew Dunstan and...@dunslane.net wrote:
On 03/01/2014 12:29 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
In the case of Unix systems, there is a *far* simpler and more portable
solution technique, which is to tell the test postmaster to put its socket
in some non-world-accessible
On Sat, Mar 01, 2014 at 12:29:38PM -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
There are two big problems with the lets-generate-a-random-password
approach. Noah acknowledged the portability issue of possibly not having
a strong entropy source available. The other issue though is whether
doing this doesn't
On 03/01/2014 09:01 AM, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
Status Summary. Needs Review: 36, Waiting on Author: 7, Ready for
Committer: 16, Committed: 43, Returned with Feedback: 8, Rejected: 4.
Total: 114.
We're still on track to achieve about 50% committed patches, which would
be similar to the
The attached patch fixes the case when `pg_dump -Fd …` is called on a partition
where write(2) fails for some reason or another. In this case, backup jobs were
returning with a successful exit code even though most of the files in the dump
directory were all zero length.
I haven’t tested this
On 03/01/2014 12:06 PM, Simon Riggs wrote:
On 27 February 2014 08:48, Simon Riggs si...@2ndquadrant.com wrote:
On 26 February 2014 15:25, Andres Freund and...@2ndquadrant.com wrote:
On 2014-02-26 15:15:00 +, Simon Riggs wrote:
On 26 February 2014 13:38, Andres Freund and...@2ndquadrant.com
* Tom Lane (t...@sss.pgh.pa.us) wrote:
In the case of Unix systems, there is a *far* simpler and more portable
solution technique, which is to tell the test postmaster to put its socket
in some non-world-accessible directory created by the test scaffolding.
Yes, yes, yes.
Of course that
Magnus Hagander mag...@hagander.net writes:
For a one-off password used locally only, we could also consider just using
a guid, and generate it using
http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/windows/desktop/aa379205(v=vs.85).aspx.
Not sure if that API is intended to create an unpredictable
=?ISO-8859-1?Q?Fabr=EDzio_de_Royes_Mello?= fabriziome...@gmail.com writes:
On Sat, Mar 1, 2014 at 2:11 PM, Tom Lane t...@sss.pgh.pa.us wrote:
[ re schema upgrade scenarios ]
Why wouldn't COR semantics answer that requirement just as well, if not
better?
Just because it will replace the
On Sat, Mar 1, 2014 at 2:11 PM, Tom Lane t...@sss.pgh.pa.us wrote:
=?ISO-8859-1?Q?Fabr=EDzio_de_Royes_Mello?= fabriziome...@gmail.com
writes:
On Sat, Jan 18, 2014 at 11:12 PM, Stephen Frost sfr...@snowman.net
wrote:
Fabrízio, can you clarify the use-case for things like CREATE AGGREGATE
to
On 03/01/2014 07:50 PM, Josh Berkus wrote:
On 03/01/2014 09:01 AM, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
Status Summary. Needs Review: 36, Waiting on Author: 7, Ready for
Committer: 16, Committed: 43, Returned with Feedback: 8, Rejected: 4.
Total: 114.
We're still on track to achieve about 50% committed
On 03/01/2014 05:10 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
One other thought here: is it actually reasonable to expend a lot of effort
on the Windows case? I'm not aware that people normally expect a Windows
box to have multiple users at all, let alone non-mutually-trusting users.
As Stephen said, it's
On Sat, Mar 1, 2014 at 5:37 AM, Pavel Stehule pavel.steh...@gmail.com
wrote:
Hello
here is a prototype:
bash-4.1$ /usr/local/pgsql/bin/psql --help-variables
List of some variables (options) for use from command line.
Complete list you find in psql section in the PostgreSQL documentation.
On 01/29/2014 10:59 AM, Ian Lawrence Barwick wrote:
2014/1/29 Ian Lawrence Barwick barw...@gmail.com:
2014-01-29 Andrew Dunstan and...@dunslane.net:
On 01/28/2014 05:55 AM, Ian Lawrence Barwick wrote:
Hi Payal
Many thanks for the review, and my apologies for not getting back to
you
2014-03-01 22:38 GMT+09:00 Stephen Frost sfr...@snowman.net:
KaiGai,
* Kohei KaiGai (kai...@kaigai.gr.jp) wrote:
BTW, this kind of discussion looks like a talk with a ghost because
we cannot see the new interface according to the parallel execution
right now, so we cannot have tangible
KaiGai,
* Kohei KaiGai (kai...@kaigai.gr.jp) wrote:
Now we have two options for GPU programming: CUDA or OpenCL.
Both of libraries and drivers are provided under the proprietary license,
so it does not fit for the core implementation of PostgreSQL, but
extensions that shall be installed on
2014-03-02 9:51 GMT+09:00 Stephen Frost sfr...@snowman.net:
KaiGai,
* Kohei KaiGai (kai...@kaigai.gr.jp) wrote:
Now we have two options for GPU programming: CUDA or OpenCL.
Both of libraries and drivers are provided under the proprietary license,
so it does not fit for the core
* Kohei KaiGai (kai...@kaigai.gr.jp) wrote:
As you mentioned, it is a headache for packagers, and does not make
sense for us if packager disabled the feature that requires proprietary
drivers.
No, I disagree with that. I don't expect this use-case to be very
common to begin with and telling
On Wed, Feb 26, 2014 at 3:02 AM, Stephen Frost sfr...@snowman.net wrote:
The custom-scan node is intended to perform on regular relations, not
only foreign tables. It means a special feature (like GPU acceleration)
can perform transparently for most of existing applications. Usually,
it
On Wed, Feb 26, 2014 at 10:23 AM, Stephen Frost sfr...@snowman.net wrote:
* Kouhei Kaigai (kai...@ak.jp.nec.com) wrote:
IIUC, his approach was integration of join-pushdown within FDW APIs,
however, it does not mean the idea of remote-join is rejected.
For my part, trying to consider doing
On Fri, Feb 28, 2014 at 10:36 AM, Stephen Frost sfr...@snowman.net wrote:
* Kouhei Kaigai (kai...@ak.jp.nec.com) wrote:
* Stephen Frost (sfr...@snowman.net) wrote:
I don't see how you can be when there hasn't been any discussion that I've
seen about how parallel query execution is going to
* Robert Haas (robertmh...@gmail.com) wrote:
On Wed, Feb 26, 2014 at 3:02 AM, Stephen Frost sfr...@snowman.net wrote:
The line between a foreign table and a local one is becoming blurred
already, but still, if this is the goal then I really think the
background worker is where you should be
On Sat, Mar 1, 2014 at 8:49 PM, Stephen Frost sfr...@snowman.net wrote:
This critique seems pretty odd to me. I haven't had the time to look
at this patch set, but I don't see why anyone would want to use the
background worker facility for GPU acceleration, which is what
KaiGai's trying to
* Robert Haas (robertmh...@gmail.com) wrote:
I don't see that parallelizing Append is any easier than any other
problem in this space. There's no parallel I/O facility, so you need
a background worker per append branch to wait on I/O. And you have
all the problems of making sure that the
2014-03-02 10:29 GMT+09:00 Stephen Frost sfr...@snowman.net:
* Kohei KaiGai (kai...@kaigai.gr.jp) wrote:
As you mentioned, it is a headache for packagers, and does not make
sense for us if packager disabled the feature that requires proprietary
drivers.
No, I disagree with that. I don't
* Robert Haas (robertmh...@gmail.com) wrote:
For what it's worth, and I can't claim to have all the answers here,
this doesn't match my expectation. I think we'll do two kinds of
parallelism. One will be parallelism within nodes, like parallel sort
or parallel seqscan. Any node we
2014-03-02 10:38 GMT+09:00 Robert Haas robertmh...@gmail.com:
On Wed, Feb 26, 2014 at 10:23 AM, Stephen Frost sfr...@snowman.net wrote:
* Kouhei Kaigai (kai...@ak.jp.nec.com) wrote:
IIUC, his approach was integration of join-pushdown within FDW APIs,
however, it does not mean the idea of
Andrew Dunstan and...@dunslane.net writes:
On 03/01/2014 05:10 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
BTW, a different problem with the proposed patch is that it changes
some test cases in ecpg and contrib/dblink, apparently to avoid session
reconnections. That seems likely to me to be losing test coverage.
On Sun, Mar 2, 2014 at 7:43 AM, Vik Fearing vik.fear...@dalibo.com wrote:
On 03/01/2014 07:50 PM, Josh Berkus wrote:
On 03/01/2014 09:01 AM, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
Status Summary. Needs Review: 36, Waiting on Author: 7, Ready for
Committer: 16, Committed: 43, Returned with Feedback: 8,
On Sat, Mar 1, 2014 at 7:39 PM, Tom Lane t...@sss.pgh.pa.us wrote:
=?ISO-8859-1?Q?Fabr=EDzio_de_Royes_Mello?= fabriziome...@gmail.com
writes:
On Sat, Mar 1, 2014 at 2:11 PM, Tom Lane t...@sss.pgh.pa.us wrote:
[ re schema upgrade scenarios ]
Why wouldn't COR semantics answer that
On Sun, Mar 2, 2014 at 12:56 AM, Michael Paquier michael.paqu...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Sun, Mar 2, 2014 at 7:43 AM, Vik Fearing vik.fear...@dalibo.com
wrote:
On 03/01/2014 07:50 PM, Josh Berkus wrote:
On 03/01/2014 09:01 AM, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
Status Summary. Needs Review: 36, Waiting
On Sat, Mar 01, 2014 at 05:51:46PM -0500, Andrew Dunstan wrote:
On 03/01/2014 05:10 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
One other thought here: is it actually reasonable to expend a lot of effort
on the Windows case? I'm not aware that people normally expect a Windows
box to have multiple users at all, let
On Sat, Mar 01, 2014 at 09:43:19PM -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
Andrew Dunstan and...@dunslane.net writes:
On 03/01/2014 05:10 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
BTW, a different problem with the proposed patch is that it changes
some test cases in ecpg and contrib/dblink, apparently to avoid session
On Fri, Feb 28, 2014 at 5:44 AM, Tom Lane t...@sss.pgh.pa.us wrote:
I looked at the postmaster log for the ongoing issue on narwhal
(to wit, that the contrib/dblink test dies the moment it tries
to do anything dblink-y), and looky here what the postmaster
has logged:
530fc965.bac:2] LOG:
On 2 Mar 2014, at 05:20, Noah Misch n...@leadboat.com wrote:
On Sat, Mar 01, 2014 at 05:51:46PM -0500, Andrew Dunstan wrote:
On 03/01/2014 05:10 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
One other thought here: is it actually reasonable to expend a lot of effort
on the Windows case? I'm not aware that people
47 matches
Mail list logo
