On Wed, Mar 12, 2014 at 01:58:14PM -0700, Peter Geoghegan wrote:
The use case you describe here doesn't sound like something similar to
full text search. It sounds like something identical.
In any case, let's focus on what we have right now. I think that the
indexing facilities proposed here
On Thu, Mar 13, 2014 at 6:15 AM, Bruce Momjian br...@momjian.us wrote:
On Wed, Mar 12, 2014 at 01:58:14PM -0700, Peter Geoghegan wrote:
The use case you describe here doesn't sound like something similar to
full text search. It sounds like something identical.
In any case, let's focus on what
Fwiw I have a few questions -- but beware, I'm a complete neophyte
when it comes to jsonb style document databases so these are more
likely to represent misconceptions on my part than problems with
jsonb.
I naively though a gin index on a jsonb would help with queries like
WHERE col-'prop' =
On 2014-03-12 20:09:23 -0400, Robert Haas wrote:
On the pgsql-packagers list, there has been some (OT for that list)
discussion of whether commit 9a57858f1103b89a5674f0d50c5fe1f756411df6
is sufficiently serious to justify yet another immediate minor release
of 9.3.x. The relevant questions
On 2014-03-12 13:34:47 -0700, Josh Berkus wrote:
On 03/12/2014 12:34 PM, Robert Haas wrote:
Urgh. That error message looks susceptible to improvement. How about:
replication slot %s cannot be dropped because it is currently in use
I think that'd require duplicating some code
On 2014-03-12 20:54:36 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
Robert Haas robertmh...@gmail.com writes:
On Wed, Mar 12, 2014 at 9:19 AM, Andres Freund and...@2ndquadrant.com
wrote:
Except that we don't have the infrastructure to perform such checks
(neither partial, nor expression indexes, no exclusion
earlier.
I have modified the corresponding documentation.
Please find the attached revised patch.
Thanks and Regards,
Kumar Rajeev Rastogi
psql-copy-count-tag-20140313.patch
Description: psql-copy-count-tag-20140313.patch
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org
On Thu, 2014-03-13 at 12:00 +0100, Andres Freund wrote:
On 2014-03-12 20:09:23 -0400, Robert Haas wrote:
On the pgsql-packagers list, there has been some (OT for that list)
discussion of whether commit 9a57858f1103b89a5674f0d50c5fe1f756411df6
is sufficiently serious to justify yet another
On 2014-03-13 13:06:00 +0100, Jozef Mlich wrote:
Does this affect also other branches? 9.2 ?
Nope, it's 9.3 only.
Greetings,
Andres Freund
--
Andres Freund http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training Services
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers
On Thu, Mar 13, 2014 at 1:21 PM, Greg Stark st...@mit.edu wrote:
Well these are just normal gin and gist indexes. If we want to come up
with new index operator classess we can still do that and keep the old
ones if necessary. Even that seems pretty unlikely from past experience.
I'm actually
On Thu, Mar 13, 2014 at 4:21 PM, Alexander Korotkov
aekorot...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Mar 13, 2014 at 1:21 PM, Greg Stark st...@mit.edu wrote:
Well these are just normal gin and gist indexes. If we want to come up
with new index operator classess we can still do that and keep the old
ones
Fwiw the jsonb data doesn't actually seem to be any smaller than text
json on this data set (this is avg(pg_column_size(col)) and I checked,
they're both using the same amount of toast space)
jsonb | json
---+---
813.5 | 716.3
(1 row)
It's still more than 7x faster in cpu costs though:
Hi Horiguchi-san,
Thank you for working this patch!
(2014/03/10 17:29), Kyotaro HORIGUCHI wrote:
Hello. As a minimal implementation, I made an attempt that emit
NOTICE message when alter table affects foreign tables. It looks
like following,
| =# alter table passwd add column added int, add
On 03/13/2014 06:53 AM, Greg Stark wrote:
I also find it awkward that col-'prop' returns the json
representation of the property. If it's text that means it's
double-quoted. I would think that a user storing text in a json
property would want a way to pull out the text that json property
* Tom Lane (t...@sss.pgh.pa.us) wrote:
I don't really think partial validation makes sense. We could just remove
the whole topic, and tell extension authors that it's up to them to defend
themselves against bizarre values stored for their table options. But I'm
wondering if there's really so
On Tue, Mar 11, 2014 at 1:49 PM, KONDO Mitsumasa
kondo.mitsum...@lab.ntt.co.jp wrote:
(2014/03/09 1:49), Fabien COELHO wrote:
Hello Mitsumasa-san,
New \setrandom interface is here.
\setrandom var min max [gaussian threshold | exponential threshold]
Attached patch realizes this
On Thu, Mar 13, 2014 at 12:47 AM, Simon Riggs si...@2ndquadrant.com wrote:
On 13 March 2014 02:14, Robert Haas robertmh...@gmail.com wrote:
I'm not sure why this is being blocked. This is a community
contribution that seeks to improve everybody's options. Blocking it
does *nothing* to prevent
On 03/13/2014 08:42 AM, Greg Stark wrote:
Fwiw the jsonb data doesn't actually seem to be any smaller than text
json on this data set (this is avg(pg_column_size(col)) and I checked,
they're both using the same amount of toast space)
jsonb | json
---+---
813.5 | 716.3
(1 row)
On Wed, Mar 12, 2014 at 11:11 PM, Fabrízio de Royes Mello
fabriziome...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi all,
Shouldn't the ALTER statements below raise an exception?
fabrizio=# CREATE TABLE foo(bar SERIAL PRIMARY KEY);
CREATE TABLE
fabrizio=# SELECT relname, reloptions FROM pg_class WHERE relname ~
On 2014-03-13 09:17:36 -0400, Robert Haas wrote:
It is very true that there are other ways for extensions to manage
per-table options.
You previously said that, but I really don't see any. Which way out
there exists that a) doesn't leave garbage after the relation is dropped
or renamed b) is
On 13-03-2014 00:11, Fabrízio de Royes Mello wrote:
Shouldn't the ALTER statements below raise an exception?
For consistency, yes. Who cares? I mean, there is no harm in resetting
an unrecognized parameter. Have in mind that tighten it up could break
scripts. In general, I'm in favor of
On Thu, Mar 13, 2014 at 12:45 AM, Amit Kapila amit.kapil...@gmail.com wrote:
While attempting to operate in? That seems like unhelpful
weasel-wording. I wonder if we ought to have separate messages for
each possibility, like delete tuple (X,Y) when called from
heap_delete(), update tuple
On Thu, Mar 13, 2014 at 1:08 PM, Andrew Dunstan and...@dunslane.net wrote:
- returns dequoted text if the value it points to is a plain string. If
it's not doing that then that's a bug.
Sorry, I must have gotten confused between various tests. It does seem
to be doing that.
--
greg
--
On 03/13/2014 03:17 PM, Fujii Masao wrote:
On Tue, Mar 11, 2014 at 1:49 PM, KONDO Mitsumasa
kondo.mitsum...@lab.ntt.co.jp wrote:
(2014/03/09 1:49), Fabien COELHO wrote:
I'm okay with this UI and its implementation.
OK.
We should do the same discussion for the UI of command-line option?
On Thu, Mar 13, 2014 at 10:51 PM, Heikki Linnakangas
hlinnakan...@vmware.com wrote:
On 03/13/2014 03:17 PM, Fujii Masao wrote:
On Tue, Mar 11, 2014 at 1:49 PM, KONDO Mitsumasa
kondo.mitsum...@lab.ntt.co.jp wrote:
(2014/03/09 1:49), Fabien COELHO wrote:
I'm okay with this UI and its
On Thu, Mar 13, 2014 at 9:26 AM, Andres Freund and...@2ndquadrant.com wrote:
On 2014-03-13 09:17:36 -0400, Robert Haas wrote:
It is very true that there are other ways for extensions to manage
per-table options.
You previously said that, but I really don't see any. Which way out
there exists
On Thu, Mar 13, 2014 at 10:34 AM, Euler Taveira eu...@timbira.com.br
wrote:
On 13-03-2014 00:11, Fabrízio de Royes Mello wrote:
Shouldn't the ALTER statements below raise an exception?
For consistency, yes. Who cares? I mean, there is no harm in resetting
an unrecognized parameter. Have in
On 2014-03-13 10:03:03 -0400, Robert Haas wrote:
On Thu, Mar 13, 2014 at 9:26 AM, Andres Freund and...@2ndquadrant.com wrote:
On 2014-03-13 09:17:36 -0400, Robert Haas wrote:
It is very true that there are other ways for extensions to manage
per-table options.
You previously said that,
On 13 March 2014 13:17, Robert Haas robertmh...@gmail.com wrote:
The bottom line here is that, as in previous years, there are a
certain number of people who show up near the end of CF4 and are
unhappy that some patch didn't get committed. Generally, they allege
that (1) there's nothing
Robert Haas robertmh...@gmail.com writes:
Well, it's sounding like we can only display the whole tuple if (1)
the message level is less than ERROR and (2) the snapshot is an MVCC
snapshot. That's an annoying and hard-to-document set of limitations.
But we should be able to display the TID
[ forgot to respond to this part ]
Andres Freund and...@2ndquadrant.com writes:
They currently don't seem to create invalidations on the objects they
are set upon, maybe we should change that?
No, because relcache doesn't store security labels to start with.
There's a separate catalog cache
On 2014-03-13 10:24:09 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
Andres Freund and...@2ndquadrant.com writes:
But security labels are a nice idea, will think about it. AFAICs there's
no builtin subdivision within the label for one provider which is a bit
of a shame but solvable. The biggest issue I see is
On Thu, Mar 13, 2014 at 10:20 AM, Andres Freund and...@2ndquadrant.com wrote:
Well, I'm not going to claim that the methods that exist today are
perfect. Things you can do include: (1) the table of tables approach,
(2) abusing comments, and perhaps (3) abusing the security label
machinery.
On 13 March 2014 13:17, Stephen Frost sfr...@snowman.net wrote:
In the end, perhaps we should just add another field which is called
'custom_reloptions' and allow that to be the wild west?
That makes sense.
... and allow that to be the wild west?
but that would be an emotive phrase that
Andres Freund and...@2ndquadrant.com writes:
But security labels are a nice idea, will think about it. AFAICs there's
no builtin subdivision within the label for one provider which is a bit
of a shame but solvable. The biggest issue I see is that it essentially
seems to require that the
On Thu, Mar 13, 2014 at 7:10 PM, Robert Haas robertmh...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Mar 13, 2014 at 12:45 AM, Amit Kapila amit.kapil...@gmail.com wrote:
_bt_doinsert - insert index tuple (X,Y) (here it will refer to index tuple
location)
I don't think that giving the index tuple location is
On 13 March 2014 14:03, Robert Haas robertmh...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Mar 13, 2014 at 9:26 AM, Andres Freund and...@2ndquadrant.com wrote:
On 2014-03-13 09:17:36 -0400, Robert Haas wrote:
It is very true that there are other ways for extensions to manage
per-table options.
You previously
On Thu, Mar 13, 2014 at 10:22 AM, Simon Riggs si...@2ndquadrant.com wrote:
On 13 March 2014 13:17, Robert Haas robertmh...@gmail.com wrote:
The bottom line here is that, as in previous years, there are a
certain number of people who show up near the end of CF4 and are
unhappy that some patch
Robert Haas escribió:
Basically, my feeling is that if you install an extension that adds
new table-level options, that's effectively a new version of the
database, and expecting a dump from that version to restore into a
vanilla database is about as reasonable as expecting 9.4 dumps to
On 2014-03-13 10:26:11 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
[ forgot to respond to this part ]
Andres Freund and...@2ndquadrant.com writes:
They currently don't seem to create invalidations on the objects they
are set upon, maybe we should change that?
No, because relcache doesn't store security
On 13 March 2014 14:36, Simon Riggs si...@2ndquadrant.com wrote:
I like that suggestion, all of it.
Perhaps change it to METADATA LABEL ?
Damn. It works, apart from the fact that we don't get parameter=value.
That may not be critical, since most use cases I can think of are booleans.
--
On 2014-03-13 10:31:12 -0400, Robert Haas wrote:
I think the really interesting question
here is how the dump-and-reload issue ought to be handled. As Tom
says, it seems on the surface as though you can either require that
the provider be loaded for that, or you can accept unvalidated
In this loop,
+ for (i = 0; i desc-natts; i++)
+ {
+ char *val;
+ int vallen;
+
+ vallen = strlen(val);
+ if
Another question. Is Peter's branch up to date with
jsonb_populate_record() ? From discussions on list it sounds like the
plan was to get rid of the use_json_as_text argument but his patch
still has it.
(Tangentially, I wonder if it wouldn't be possible to make this a
plain cast. I'm not sure but
Andres Freund and...@2ndquadrant.com writes:
On 2014-03-13 10:26:11 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
No, because relcache doesn't store security labels to start with.
There's a separate catalog cache for security labels, I believe,
and invalidating entries in that ought to be sufficient.
There doesn't
On Thu, Mar 13, 2014 at 10:27 AM, Andres Freund and...@2ndquadrant.com wrote:
On 2014-03-13 10:24:09 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
Andres Freund and...@2ndquadrant.com writes:
But security labels are a nice idea, will think about it. AFAICs there's
no builtin subdivision within the label for one
On Thu, Mar 13, 2014 at 10:45 AM, Andres Freund and...@2ndquadrant.com wrote:
On 2014-03-13 10:31:12 -0400, Robert Haas wrote:
I think the really interesting question
here is how the dump-and-reload issue ought to be handled. As Tom
says, it seems on the surface as though you can either
On 03/13/2014 10:49 AM, Greg Stark wrote:
Another question. Is Peter's branch up to date with
jsonb_populate_record() ? From discussions on list it sounds like the
plan was to get rid of the use_json_as_text argument but his patch
still has it.
Yes, we're not changing that, and some people
On 2014-03-13 11:11:51 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
Andres Freund and...@2ndquadrant.com writes:
On 2014-03-13 10:26:11 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
No, because relcache doesn't store security labels to start with.
There's a separate catalog cache for security labels, I believe,
and invalidating
Hi,
Thanks for the input. I would look into JSON parsing as well, but the
requirement is XML parsing.
There is no DTD/Schema for the XML. Is there any way I could know what
are the possible tags and their values? I am building my parser based on
the output PostgreSQL produces (hard coding
On Thu, Mar 13, 2014 at 1:48 AM, Bruce Momjian br...@momjian.us wrote:
On Mon, Dec 9, 2013 at 11:27:28AM -0500, Robert Haas wrote:
On Thu, Dec 5, 2013 at 6:15 PM, Tom Lane t...@sss.pgh.pa.us wrote:
But the other usages seem to be in assorted utilities, which
will need to do it right for
Robert Haas escribió:
Well, I don't have a big problem with the idea that some sessions
might not have a certain extension loaded. For some extensions, that
might not lead to very coherent behavior, but I guess it's the
extension developer's job to tell the user whether or not that
On Thu, Mar 13, 2014 at 11:11 AM, Tom Lane t...@sss.pgh.pa.us wrote:
Andres Freund and...@2ndquadrant.com writes:
On 2014-03-13 10:26:11 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
No, because relcache doesn't store security labels to start with.
There's a separate catalog cache for security labels, I believe,
On 2014-03-13 11:15:56 -0400, Robert Haas wrote:
On Thu, Mar 13, 2014 at 10:27 AM, Andres Freund and...@2ndquadrant.com
wrote:
On 2014-03-13 10:24:09 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
Andres Freund and...@2ndquadrant.com writes:
But security labels are a nice idea, will think about it. AFAICs
On 2014-03-13 11:20:02 -0400, Robert Haas wrote:
At the same time, I
don't feel compelled to provide an autoload mechanism to cover the
case where a user tries to set a label in a session which does not
have the label provider preloaded.
I don't think there's that much need for that to be
On 2014-03-13 11:26:10 -0400, Robert Haas wrote:
On Thu, Mar 13, 2014 at 11:11 AM, Tom Lane t...@sss.pgh.pa.us wrote:
If there's not a catcache for pg_seclabels, I'd have no objection
to adding one. As for your userland cache objection, you certainly
could build such a thing using the
fabriziomello wrote
On Thu, Mar 13, 2014 at 10:34 AM, Euler Taveira lt;
euler@.com
gt;
wrote:
On 13-03-2014 00:11, Fabrízio de Royes Mello wrote:
Shouldn't the ALTER statements below raise an exception?
For consistency, yes. Who cares? I mean, there is no harm in resetting
an
On 03/13/2014 11:27 AM, Ashoke wrote:
Hi,
Thanks for the input. I would look into JSON parsing as well, but
the requirement is XML parsing.
There is no DTD/Schema for the XML. Is there any way I could know
what are the possible tags and their values? I am building my parser
based on
Andres Freund and...@2ndquadrant.com writes:
On 2014-03-13 11:26:10 -0400, Robert Haas wrote:
I have however had the thought before that it would be nice to allow
for callbacks of invalidation functions of some kind even on catalogs
that don't have catcaches.
Unfortunately the format
Hi,
We are computer engineering students from Maharashtra Institute of
Technology, Pune, Maharashtra, India. We are pursuing Bachelor of
Engineering degree in Computer Engineering. As a part of the curriculum, we
are supposed to perform a group project in the final year on a topic of our
choice.
This is my first email to the PostgreSQL mailing lists so I hope this is
the correct place. If not, please let me know.
I was wondering if it would be possible and wise to support JSON Patch?
https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc6902
One of the problems I have as a user is how to update a portion of a
On 03/12/2014 07:52 PM, Alexander Korotkov wrote:
* I just noticed that the dummy trueTriConsistentFn returns GIN_MAYBE,
rather than GIN_TRUE. The equivalent boolean version returns 'true' without
recheck. Is that a typo, or was there some reason for the discrepancy?
Actually, there is not
On 03/13/2014 09:53 AM, Ryan Pedela wrote:
This is my first email to the PostgreSQL mailing lists so I hope this is
the correct place. If not, please let me know.
I was wondering if it would be possible and wise to support JSON Patch?
https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc6902
One of the
On 03/13/2014 04:07 AM, Andres Freund wrote:
On 2014-03-12 13:34:47 -0700, Josh Berkus wrote:
On 03/12/2014 12:34 PM, Robert Haas wrote:
Urgh. That error message looks susceptible to improvement. How about:
replication slot %s cannot be dropped because it is currently in use
I think
On 03/13/2014 08:54 AM, Rajashree Mandaogane wrote:
We have decided to modify the storage of PostgresSQL for columnar storage
along with row based tuple storage. We are trying to modify the planner and
optimiser to generate the plan using data stored in both both row and
columnar storage. We
All,
First, I'll note that one of the reasons we haven't had a bunch of
reports from the field about this is that a lot of our users have yet to
apply 9.3.3, so if they have corruption issues they probably attribute
them to the issues which are fixed in 9.3.3. I know that's the case
with our
On Thu, Mar 13, 2014 at 5:10 PM, Josh Berkus j...@agliodbs.com wrote:
First, I'll note that one of the reasons we haven't had a bunch of
reports from the field about this is that a lot of our users have yet to
apply 9.3.3, so if they have corruption issues they probably attribute
them to the
On 03/13/2014 01:01 PM, Josh Berkus wrote:
On 03/13/2014 09:53 AM, Ryan Pedela wrote:
This is my first email to the PostgreSQL mailing lists so I hope this is
the correct place. If not, please let me know.
I was wondering if it would be possible and wise to support JSON Patch?
Rajeev rastogi rajeev.rast...@huawei.com writes:
[ updated patch ]
I've committed this patch with additional revisions.
Based on my analysis, I observed that just file pointer comparison may not be
sufficient
to decide whether to display command tag or not. E.g. imagine below scenario:
On Thu, Mar 13, 2014 at 8:58 PM, Heikki Linnakangas hlinnakan...@vmware.com
wrote:
On 03/12/2014 07:52 PM, Alexander Korotkov wrote:
* I just noticed that the dummy trueTriConsistentFn returns GIN_MAYBE,
rather than GIN_TRUE. The equivalent boolean version returns 'true'
without
recheck.
We should do the same discussion for the UI of command-line option? The
patch adds two options --gaussian and --exponential, but this UI seems
to be a bit inconsistent with the UI for \setrandom.
Instead, we can use something like --distribution=[uniform | gaussian |
exponential].
Hmmm.
On Thu, Mar 13, 2014 at 1:03 PM, Josh Berkus j...@agliodbs.com wrote:
On 03/13/2014 04:07 AM, Andres Freund wrote:
On 2014-03-12 13:34:47 -0700, Josh Berkus wrote:
On 03/12/2014 12:34 PM, Robert Haas wrote:
Urgh. That error message looks susceptible to improvement. How about:
replication
On Thu, Mar 13, 2014 at 12:11 PM, Tom Lane t...@sss.pgh.pa.us wrote:
Andres Freund and...@2ndquadrant.com writes:
On 2014-03-13 11:26:10 -0400, Robert Haas wrote:
I have however had the thought before that it would be nice to allow
for callbacks of invalidation functions of some kind even on
On Thu, Mar 13, 2014 at 11:42 AM, Andres Freund and...@2ndquadrant.com wrote:
On 2014-03-13 11:26:10 -0400, Robert Haas wrote:
On Thu, Mar 13, 2014 at 11:11 AM, Tom Lane t...@sss.pgh.pa.us wrote:
If there's not a catcache for pg_seclabels, I'd have no objection
to adding one. As for your
On Thu, Mar 13, 2014 at 11:37 AM, Andres Freund and...@2ndquadrant.com wrote:
I seriously doubt that's going to work nicely. Now you've implicitly
introduced a dependency from every object that has a label to the
label provider. pg_dump is going to have to restore the validator
function
On Thu, Mar 13, 2014 at 11:30 AM, Alvaro Herrera
alvhe...@2ndquadrant.com wrote:
Robert Haas escribió:
Well, I don't have a big problem with the idea that some sessions
might not have a certain extension loaded. For some extensions, that
might not lead to very coherent behavior, but I guess
On 13.3.2014 13:28, Oleg Bartunov wrote:
On Thu, Mar 13, 2014 at 4:21 PM, Alexander Korotkov
aekorot...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Mar 13, 2014 at 1:21 PM, Greg Stark st...@mit.edu wrote:
Well these are just normal gin and gist indexes. If we want to come up
with new index operator classess we
On Mon, Mar 10, 2014 at 4:18 AM, Peter Geoghegan p...@heroku.com wrote:
* Extensive additional documentation. References to the very new JSON
RFC. I think that this revision is in general a lot more coherent, and
I found that reflecting on what idiomatic usage should look like while
writing
Peter Geoghegan has been doing a lot of great cleanup of the jsonb code,
after moving in the bits we wanted from nested hstore. You can see the
current state of the code at
https://github.com/feodor/postgres/tree/jsonb_and_hstore
I've been working through some of his changes, I will
Alvaro Herrera escribió:
I also fixed the sequence OWNED BY problem simply by adding support for
ALTER SEQUENCE. Of course, the intention is that all forms of CREATE
and ALTER are supported, but this one seems reasonable standalone
because CREATE TABLE uses it internally.
I have been
On Thu, Mar 13, 2014 at 2:21 AM, Greg Stark st...@mit.edu wrote:
It does sound like the main question here is which opclass should be
the default. From the discussion there's a jsonb_hash_ops which works
on all input values but supports fewer operators and a jsonb_ops which
supports more
On 03/13/2014 01:17 PM, Robert Haas wrote:
I think in use is just as clear as active, and I think the text
Andres proposed previously reads a whole lot more nicely than this:
replication slot %s is in use by another backend
Then we should change the column name in the
On Thu, Mar 13, 2014 at 6:45 PM, Josh Berkus j...@agliodbs.com wrote:
On 03/13/2014 01:17 PM, Robert Haas wrote:
I think in use is just as clear as active, and I think the text
Andres proposed previously reads a whole lot more nicely than this:
replication slot %s is in use by another backend
On 03/13/2014 05:01 PM, Robert Haas wrote:
On Thu, Mar 13, 2014 at 6:45 PM, Josh Berkus j...@agliodbs.com wrote:
On 03/13/2014 01:17 PM, Robert Haas wrote:
I think in use is just as clear as active, and I think the text
Andres proposed previously reads a whole lot more nicely than this:
On Thu, Mar 13, 2014 at 8:09 PM, Josh Berkus j...@agliodbs.com wrote:
On 03/13/2014 05:01 PM, Robert Haas wrote:
On Thu, Mar 13, 2014 at 6:45 PM, Josh Berkus j...@agliodbs.com wrote:
On 03/13/2014 01:17 PM, Robert Haas wrote:
I think in use is just as clear as active, and I think the text
On 03/13/2014 05:28 PM, Robert Haas wrote:
Well we may have kind of hosed ourselves, because the in-memory data
structures that represent the data structure have an in_use flag that
indicates whether the structure is allocated at all, and then an
active flag that indicates whether some backend
On 03/04/2014 10:53 PM, Yuri Levinsky wrote:
Please advise me: I just downloaded the source and compiled it. Sun Spark
Solaris 9 is always 64 bit, I verified it with sys admin. He may run 32 bit
applications as well. Have I use some special option during compilation to
verify that compiled
On Wed, Mar 12, 2014 at 12:22 PM, Haribabu Kommi
kommi.harib...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Mar 11, 2014 at 2:59 PM, Amit Kapila amit.kapil...@gmail.com wrote:
By the way have you checked if FreeSpaceMapVacuum() can serve your
purpose, because this call already traverses FSM in depth-first order
Hi,
In connection to my previous proposal about providing catalog view to
pg_hba.conf file contents , I have developed the attached patch .
[Current situation]
Currently, to view the pg_hba.conf file contents, DB admin has to access
the file from database server to read the settings. In
Hi,
(2014/03/14 4:21), Fabien COELHO wrote:
We should do the same discussion for the UI of command-line option? The patch
adds two options --gaussian and --exponential, but this UI seems to be a bit
inconsistent with the UI for \setrandom.
Instead, we can use something like
(2014/03/13 23:00), Fujii Masao wrote:
On Thu, Mar 13, 2014 at 10:51 PM, Heikki Linnakangas
hlinnakan...@vmware.com wrote:
On 03/13/2014 03:17 PM, Fujii Masao wrote:
On Tue, Mar 11, 2014 at 1:49 PM, KONDO Mitsumasa
kondo.mitsum...@lab.ntt.co.jp wrote:
(2014/03/09 1:49), Fabien COELHO wrote:
91 matches
Mail list logo
