On 05/05/2014 07:16 PM, Bruce Momjian wrote:
On Mon, May 5, 2014 at 10:58:57AM -0700, Peter Geoghegan wrote:
On Mon, May 5, 2014 at 8:28 AM, Andrew Dunstan and...@dunslane.net wrote:
How about:
This data type allows for faster access to values in the json document
and faster and more
On Mon, May 5, 2014 at 4:26 PM, Andrew Dunstan and...@dunslane.net wrote:
After all, everything that's not a number or boolean is typed as text (just
as it is in JSON). We don't, for example, map anything to timestamp types.
JSON doesn't have a timestamp primitive type. Of those types that it
On 05/05/2014 07:34 PM, Peter Geoghegan wrote:
On Mon, May 5, 2014 at 4:26 PM, Andrew Dunstan and...@dunslane.net wrote:
After all, everything that's not a number or boolean is typed as text (just
as it is in JSON). We don't, for example, map anything to timestamp types.
JSON doesn't have a
On Mon, May 5, 2014 at 04:20:26PM -0700, Peter Geoghegan wrote:
On Mon, May 5, 2014 at 4:14 PM, Bruce Momjian br...@momjian.us wrote:
We rarely get into specific numers like this. It says higher limit(s) and
hopefully that is enough. If you want to create a documentation 'id' I
can like
On Mon, May 5, 2014 at 5:13 PM, Bruce Momjian br...@momjian.us wrote:
OK, I understand now. I also split the item into two separate ones so I
could highlight things. Please see the new ouput --- I ended up
creating a pg_stat_statements section because there are now three items:
On Mon, May 5, 2014 at 05:22:59PM -0700, Peter Geoghegan wrote:
On Mon, May 5, 2014 at 5:13 PM, Bruce Momjian br...@momjian.us wrote:
OK, I understand now. I also split the item into two separate ones so I
could highlight things. Please see the new ouput --- I ended up
creating a
On Tue, Apr 22, 2014 at 03:19:15PM -0400, Bruce Momjian wrote:
On Sat, Mar 1, 2014 at 12:27:19PM -0800, Sean Chittenden wrote:
The attached patch fixes the case when `pg_dump -Fd …` is called
on a partition where write(2) fails for some reason or another. In
this case, backup jobs were
On Mon, May 5, 2014 at 6:54 PM, Tom Lane t...@sss.pgh.pa.us wrote:
Robert Haas robertmh...@gmail.com writes:
On Mon, May 5, 2014 at 3:09 PM, Tom Lane t...@sss.pgh.pa.us wrote:
And the controlled shared segment is likely to be how big exactly? It's
probably not even possible for it to be
On Mon, May 5, 2014 at 1:30 PM, Bruce Momjian br...@momjian.us wrote:
Seems there is no documentation for the 9.4 worker_spi contrib module. Is
this OK? The comment at the top of the C file says:
* Sample background worker code that demonstrates various coding
* patterns:
Robert Haas wrote:
On Mon, May 5, 2014 at 1:30 PM, Bruce Momjian br...@momjian.us wrote:
Seems there is no documentation for the 9.4 worker_spi contrib module. Is
this OK? The comment at the top of the C file says:
* Sample background worker code that demonstrates various coding
On Mon, May 5, 2014 at 11:57 AM, Mark Kirkwood
mark.kirkw...@catalyst.net.nz wrote:
On 05/05/14 15:22, Amit Kapila wrote:
Right, but have a look at the 1st message in this thread - the current
behavior (and to a large extent the above condition) means that setting
cost limits per table does
From: Jeff Janes jeff.ja...@gmail.com
Does anyone have any hints on how to get a stack trace programmatically,
rather than trying to run ps to get the pid and then attach gdb to a
ephemeral process and hoping the situation has not been changed while you
are doing that? I'd like to set
On 06/05/14 16:28, Amit Kapila wrote:
On Mon, May 5, 2014 at 11:57 AM, Mark Kirkwood
mark.kirkw...@catalyst.net.nz wrote:
On 05/05/14 15:22, Amit Kapila wrote:
Right, but have a look at the 1st message in this thread - the current
behavior (and to a large extent the above condition) means that
On Mon, May 5, 2014 at 6:38 PM, Heikki Linnakangas
hlinnakan...@vmware.com wrote:
On 05/01/2014 07:55 AM, Amit Kapila wrote:
4. Similar to Andrew, I also could not reproduce this problem on my
Windows system (Windows 7 64 bit)
e:\e:\PostgreSQL\master\install 1\ins@1\bin\initdb.exe -D e:
101 - 114 of 114 matches
Mail list logo
