On Fri, Sep 12, 2014 at 12:07 AM, Robert Haas robertmh...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Sep 11, 2014 at 7:34 AM, Amit Kapila amit.kapil...@gmail.com
wrote:
Don't we need some way to prohibit changing GUC by launching process,
once it has shared the existing GUC?
Nope. I mean, eventually, for
On 09/20/2014 12:38 AM, Stephen Frost wrote:
I would not (nor do I feel that I did..) have committed it over a
specific request to not do so from another committer. I had been hoping
that there would be another review coming from somewhere, but there is
always a trade-off between waiting
On 20 September 2014 06:13, Andrew Gierth and...@tao11.riddles.org.uk wrote:
Adam == Brightwell, Adam adam.brightw...@crunchydatasolutions.com
writes:
Adam At any rate, this appears to be a previously existing issue
Adam with WITH CHECK OPTION. Thoughts?
It's definitely an existing
On Wed, Sep 10, 2014 at 10:09 AM, Michael Paquier michael.paqu...@gmail.com
wrote:
New patches taking into account all those comments are attached.
I have looked into refactoring related patch and would like
to share my observations with you:
1.
+ * Run IDENTIFY_SYSTEM through a given
On Sat, Sep 20, 2014 at 7:03 AM, Dean Rasheed dean.a.rash...@gmail.com wrote:
Fortunately it looks pretty trivial though. The patch attached fixes
the above test cases.
Obviously this needs to be fixed in 9.4 and HEAD.
Wouldn't it be better if bundled with some regression tests?
--
Michael
Heikki.I have idea. when i begining vacuum i must create structure like hash table. And the first action i fill this hash table.in code this look like:for( blkno = ..; all pages; blkno++) { if(! gistPageIsLeaf(blkno)) { for( all tuples in blkno ) { hash[ blkno that is referenced by
Hi,
At the moment there's some rememnants of support for borland CC. I don't
believe it's likely that any of it still works. I can't remember ever
seing a buildfarm animal running it either - not surprising it's ~15
years since the last release.
Since there's both msvc and mingw support for
Hello everyone..i am new to PostgreSQL project. I had prior experience with
sql+ , with oracle 11g database server. Kindly help me grasp more about the
project.
Thank you,
Tapan Halani
Stephen,
Yes- but that's pretty trivially done, given that you've stipulated that
a single connection DB connection must be used from authentication until
de-authentication. All that is needed is an additional column in the
auth table which is populated with a pseudo-random value which is
On 09/16/2014 01:51 PM, Tapan Halani wrote:
Hello everyone..i am new to PostgreSQL project. I had prior experience
with sql+ , with oracle 11g database server. Kindly help me grasp more
about the project.
The first thing you need to do is learn to ask your question in the
right forum.
On 09/20/2014 09:24 AM, Andres Freund wrote:
Hi,
At the moment there's some rememnants of support for borland CC. I don't
believe it's likely that any of it still works. I can't remember ever
seing a buildfarm animal running it either - not surprising it's ~15
years since the last release.
On Sat, Sep 20, 2014 at 7:09 AM, Amit Kapila amit.kapil...@gmail.com wrote:
I have looked into refactoring related patch and would like
to share my observations with you:
Thanks! Useful input is always welcome.
1.
+ * Run IDENTIFY_SYSTEM through a given connection and give back to caller
On September 20, 2014 4:03:43 PM CEST, Andrew Dunstan and...@dunslane.net
wrote:
On 09/20/2014 09:24 AM, Andres Freund wrote:
Hi,
At the moment there's some rememnants of support for borland CC. I
don't
believe it's likely that any of it still works. I can't remember ever
seing a buildfarm
On 09/20/2014 12:23 AM, Craig Ringer wrote:
On 09/20/2014 12:38 AM, Stephen Frost wrote:
I would not (nor do I feel that I did..) have committed it over a
specific request to not do so from another committer. I had been hoping
that there would be another review coming from somewhere, but
Re: Andres Freund 2014-06-04 20140604194544.gb...@awork2.anarazel.de
I'm unconvinced that this'd add much to our regression testing capability,
though. The standard thing is to do an EXPLAIN to check the plan shape
and then run the query to see if it gets the right answer. Checking row
This a toy example from a 'upsert' script that appends new data:
select a from (select 1 as a) as t1 where not exists (select true from
(select 2 as a) t2 where a=a) ;
a
───
(0 rows)
select a from (select 1 as a) as t1 where not exists (select true from
(select 2 as a) t2 where t1.a=t2.a) ;
bill == bill wilson bill.wilson.h...@gmail.com writes:
bill This a toy example from a 'upsert' script that appends new data:
bill select a from (select 1 as a) as t1 where not exists (select
bill true from (select 2 as a) t2 where a=a) ;
bill a
bill ───
bill (0 rows)
bill Please tell me
Robert Haas wrote:
On Tue, Sep 16, 2014 at 7:20 AM, Etsuro Fujita
fujita.ets...@lab.ntt.co.jp wrote:
Here is a patch to a bit improve the reference page for the LOCK
command. I think it'd be better for the isolation level to be in
capitals and wrapped in the literal tags.
It's done
18 matches
Mail list logo
