On 01/05/15 15:17, Bruce Momjian wrote:
On Fri, May 1, 2015 at 03:13:28PM +0200, Petr Jelinek wrote:
On 01/05/15 15:01, Bruce Momjian wrote:
On Fri, May 1, 2015 at 05:25:53AM +0200, Pavel Stehule wrote:
It is done
Uh, I am not sure why you say that as I don't see any commit related to
On Mon, Apr 27, 2015 at 5:07 AM, Shigeru Hanada
shigeru.han...@gmail.com wrote:
2015-04-27 11:00 GMT+09:00 Kouhei Kaigai kai...@ak.jp.nec.com:
Hanada-san, could you adjust your postgres_fdw patch according to
the above new (previous?) definition.
The attached v14 patch is the revised version
On Thu, Apr 30, 2015 at 9:11 PM, Bruce Momjian br...@momjian.us wrote:
On Tue, Mar 10, 2015 at 02:51:30PM -0400, Robert Haas wrote:
On Tue, Mar 10, 2015 at 2:32 PM, Pavel Stehule pavel.steh...@gmail.com
wrote:
1. funcname_signature_string
2. get_rule_expr
Thanks. Patch attached. I'll
On Fri, May 1, 2015 at 9:13 AM, Bruce Momjian br...@momjian.us wrote:
On Fri, May 1, 2015 at 07:57:27AM -0400, Robert Haas wrote:
On Thu, Apr 30, 2015 at 9:34 PM, Bruce Momjian br...@momjian.us wrote:
On Wed, Mar 11, 2015 at 02:40:16PM +, Andrew Gierth wrote:
An issue that comes up
On Fri, May 1, 2015 at 9:09 AM, Marko Tiikkaja ma...@joh.to wrote:
On 2015-04-28 19:43, Robert Haas wrote:
I guess
the root of the problem is that PL/plgsql's cache invalidation logic
only considers the pg_proc row's TID and xmin when deciding whether to
recompile. For base types that's
101 - 105 of 105 matches
Mail list logo
