Re: [HACKERS] improved DefElem list processing

On 8/4/16 2:08 PM, Tom Lane wrote: > +1 on the general idea, but I wonder if it's a problem that you replaced > an O(N) check with an O(N^2) check. I don't think there are any commands > that would be likely to have so many options that this would become a > serious issue, but ... I'll run some

Re: [HACKERS] Heap WARM Tuples - Design Draft

On Fri, Aug 5, 2016 at 12:25:39PM -0300, Claudio Freire wrote: > > 2. The existence of index pointers to intermediate tuples will lead to index > > bloat. This is the same problem that we found in Simon's original proposal > > (discussed internally). None of the intermediate line pointers can be

Re: [HACKERS] regression test for extended query protocol

On Fri, Aug 5, 2016 at 10:11 AM, Tom Lane wrote: > Robert Haas writes: >> I think it would be an interesting project for someone to try to >> figure out how to make 'make check-extended-query-protocol' or similar >> work. > > Seems like it would not be

<    1   2