Re: [HACKERS] asynchronous and vectorized execution

This is random thoughts on this patch. At Tue, 30 Aug 2016 12:17:52 +0900 (Tokyo Standard Time), Kyotaro HORIGUCHI wrote in <20160830.121752.100817694.horiguchi.kyot...@lab.ntt.co.jp> > > As the result, the attached patchset is functionally the same > > with

Re: [HACKERS] pgsql: Add putenv support for msvcrt from Visual Studio 2013

* Michael Paquier wrote: > On Wed, Apr 27, 2016 at 2:39 AM, Christian Ullrich wrote: >> * Christian Ullrich wrote: > And actually, by looking at those patches, isn't it a dangerous > practice to be able to load multiple versions of the same DLL routines > in the same

Re: [HACKERS] Proposal for changes to recovery.conf API

On Thu, Sep 1, 2016 at 4:01 AM, Abhijit Menon-Sen wrote: > At 2016-08-31 17:15:59 +0100, si...@2ndquadrant.com wrote: >> >> * Recovery parameters would now be part of the main postgresql.conf >> infrastructure >> Any parameters set in $DATADIR/recovery.conf will be read

[HACKERS] Add support for restrictive RLS policies

Greetings, As outlined in the commit message, this adds support for restrictive RLS policies. We've had this in the backend since 9.5, but they were only available via hooks and therefore extensions. This adds support for them to be configured through regular DDL commands. These policies are,

Re: [HACKERS] Logical Replication WIP

On 2016-09-01 01:04, Erik Rijkers wrote: On 2016-08-31 22:51, Petr Jelinek wrote: Here are some small changes to logical-replication.sgml ... and other .sgml files. Erik Rijkers--- doc/src/sgml/ref/alter_publication.sgml.orig 2016-09-01 07:20:03.280295807 +0200 +++

Re: [HACKERS] Proposal for changes to recovery.conf API

On Wed, Aug 31, 2016 at 05:15:59PM +0100, Simon Riggs wrote: > Recover mode starts the server as a standby server which > expects to receive changes from a primary/master server using physical > streaming replication or is used for performing a recovery from > backup. I understand where this is

<    1   2