Re: [HACKERS] sequence data type

On Tue, Jan 10, 2017 at 5:03 AM, Peter Eisentraut wrote: > On 1/8/17 2:39 PM, Steve Singer wrote: >> The only concern I have with the functionality is that there isn't a way >> to change the type of a sequence. > > If we implement the NEXT VALUE FOR expression (or anything similar that > returns a

Re: [HACKERS] proposal: session server side variables

2017-01-10 7:31 GMT+01:00 Fabien COELHO : > > Hello Robert, > > Half-persistence (in definition, not in value) is not a key feature needed >>> by the use-case. >>> >> >> Well, you don't get to decide that. >> > > I do not think that your reprimand is deserved about this point: I did not > decide a

<    1   2