On Fri, 28 Jun 2002, Lamar Owen wrote:
On Friday 28 June 2002 10:46 am, Tom Lane wrote:
Guido Ostkamp [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I am sure, a lot of people would be happy, if those groups were
officially introduced and hosted on many international newservers.
Yup. Are you
Tom Lane [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Guido Ostkamp [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I am sure, a lot of people would be happy, if those groups were
officially introduced and hosted on many international newservers.
Yup. Are you volunteering to be the proponent who shepherds a vote
through the
From the ToDo list:
Vacuum: * Provide automatic running of vacuum in the background (Tom)
As of 7.2 we have lazy vacuum. The next logical step is setting up vacuum to
run automatically in the background either as some type of daemon or as
something kicked off by the postmaster.
I am
Matthew T. O'Connor [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
As of 7.2 we have lazy vacuum. The next logical step is setting up vacuum to
run automatically in the background either as some type of daemon or as
something kicked off by the postmaster.
I am interested in working on this to do item, although
On Sat, 2002-06-29 at 20:14, Tom Lane wrote:
Matthew T. O'Connor [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Second: There was some discussion
(http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-hackers/2002-05/msg00970.php) about
this not being neede once UNDO is on place, what is the current view on this?
I do
J. R. Nield [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I do not think that is the case; and anyway we've pretty much rejected
Vadim's notion of going to an Oracle-style UNDO buffer.
Could someone point me to this discussion, or summarize what the problem
was?
I'm too lazy to dig through the archives at the
Tom Lane wrote:
J. R. Nield [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I do not think that is the case; and anyway we've pretty much rejected
Vadim's notion of going to an Oracle-style UNDO buffer.
Could someone point me to this discussion, or summarize what the problem
was?
I'm too lazy to dig
On Sat, 2002-06-29 at 21:55, Tom Lane wrote:
J. R. Nield [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I do not think that is the case; and anyway we've pretty much rejected
Vadim's notion of going to an Oracle-style UNDO buffer.
Could someone point me to this discussion, or summarize what the problem
On Saturday 29 June 2002 08:14 pm, Tom Lane wrote:
Launching VACUUMs on some automatic schedule, preferably using feedback
about where space needs to be reclaimed, seems like a pretty
straightforward small-matter-of-programming. The thing that would
really be needed to make it unobtrusive is
