Bruce Momjian wrote:
OK, I have updated the libpq major number in 7.3.X, and updated major
and minor in HEAD. Do I need to increment the other interfaces that
_use_ libpq, like ecpg? I think so.
You'll only need to increment the major number of those other
interfaces that are no longer
Many thanks for the explanation. Could you explain to me where the order or
the writeset for the following scenario;
If a tranasction takes 50ms to reach one database from another, for a
specific data element (called X), the following timeline occurs
at 0ms, T1(X) is written to system A.
at
Another concern I have with multi-master systems is what happens if the
network splits in 2 so that 2 master systems are taking commits for 2
separate sets of clients. It seems to me that to re-sync the 2 databases
upon the network healing would be a very complex task or impossible task.
On
David,
This can be resolved by requiring that for any transaction to succeed the
entrypoint database must receive acknowlegements from n/2 + 0.5 (rounded up
to the nearest integer) databases where n is the total number in the
replicant set. The following cases are shown as an example;
Total
Bruce Momjian writes:
Do I need to increment the other interfaces that
_use_ libpq, like ecpg?
If and only if the libpq API is part of their documented API. For ecpg I
think this is not the case, but for libpq++ it would seem to be the case.
--
Peter Eisentraut [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hannu Krosing writes:
Could you also post it somewhere as a plain SQL script for 7.3 ?
It depends on SQL features not present in 7.3. But you can download it
from the CVS web interface and make the adjustments yourself if you want
to use it.
--
Peter Eisentraut [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Peter Eisentraut [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Bruce Momjian writes:
Do I need to increment the other interfaces that
_use_ libpq, like ecpg?
If and only if the libpq API is part of their documented API. For ecpg I
think this is not the case, but for libpq++ it would seem to be the case.
Jonathan,
How do the group communication daemons on system A and B agree that T2 is
after T1?,
As I understand it the operation is performed locally before being passed on
to the group for replication, when T2 arrives at system B, system B has no
knowlege of T1 and so can perform T2 sucessfully.
Kevin Brown wrote:
Devrim G?ND?Z wrote:
I do NOT like hearing about MySQL in this (these) list(s).
PostgreSQL is not in the same category with MySQL. MySQL is for
*dummies*, not database admins. I do not even call it a database. I
have never forgotten my data loss 2,5 years ago; when
On Sun, Dec 15, 2002 at 11:21:07AM -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
However, an app linked against libpq++ would also be linked against
libpq, and so the incompatibility will be flagged by the linker anyway.
I can see no need to bump libpq++'s own number.
Plus, of course, libpq++ being a C++ library
Jonathan,
Many thanks for clarifying the situation some more. With token passing, I
have the following concerns;
1) What happends if a server holding the token should die whilst it is in
posession of the token.
2) If I have n servers, and the time to pass the token between each server
is x
You can't sell into the ISP appliance market until there's something as
ubiquitous as PHPMyAdmin for PostgreSQL. And note that the ISP
appliance
market only cares about this in a very indirect way. They don't actually
use
the database; their /customers/ do. And their customers are likely to
Hello hackers,
I wonder what the PageGetMaxOffsetNumber macro is supposed to do (in a
btree index page)?
The scenario is the following: I need to get the pointer to a btree
page (leaf or internal) in its parent page, to call _bt_itemdel on it.
The only thing I can think of is to use its parent
On Sun, Dec 15, 2002 at 11:49:57PM -0300, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
I iterate over the elements of the parent page in a for loop, and the
upper bound is rarely reached because the item is found. However
sometimes the item isn't found, and PageGetItem fails its assertion
because the item isn't
hello, Joe Conway.
it seems the crosstab function you write in contrib/tablefunc can't work.
it saids that A column definition list is required for functions returning RECORD.
How can i make it work?
thank you very much
best regard,
Jinqiang Han
---(end of
Jinqiang Han wrote:
it seems the crosstab function you write in contrib/tablefunc can't work.
it saids that A column definition list is required for functions returning RECORD.
How can i make it work?
From contrib/tablefunc/README.tablefunc:
Outputs
Returns setof record, which must
But it's something they should of already had to do. We're just paying
late for old sins. ;)
Greg
On Thu, 2002-12-12 at 23:34, Bruce Momjian wrote:
Tom Lane wrote:
Bruce Momjian [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
OK, so what do we do with 7.3.1. Increment major or minor?
Major. I
Darren Johnson wrote:
The group communication system doesn't just run on one system. For
postgres-r using spread
The reason why group communication software is used is simply because
this software is designed with two goals in mind:
1) optimize bandwidth usage
2) make many-to-many
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Kevin Brown wrote:
Simply saying MySQL has better marketing isn't enough. It's too
simple an answer and obscures some issues that should probably be
addressed.
I think it /is/ a significant factor, the point being that the MySQL company
has been quite activist
19 matches
Mail list logo
