--On Sunday, August 24, 2003 22:49:00 -0400 Bruce Momjian
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
OK, I now realized this code is shell script, not Makefile content.
Code changed to:
THREAD_CFLAGS = $THREAD_CFLAGS -D_REENTRANT
Ok, but we are **STILL** broke for the --enable-thread-safety flag due to
your
I am working my way through my email to that ***ISSUE*** (*** looks kind
of silly, doesn't it). If you are putting those stars there because I
am not working on that issue fast enough for you, well ...
---
Larry Rosenman
--On Sunday, August 24, 2003 23:17:07 -0400 Bruce Momjian
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I am working my way through my email to that ***ISSUE*** (*** looks kind
of silly, doesn't it). If you are putting those stars there because I
am not working on that issue fast enough for you, well ...
I posted
Tom Lane wrote:
Christopher Kings-Lynne [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
... If that's
what we think we want, we'd better put it on the wish-list for 7.5.
If we had a Parse function, then we at phpPgAdmin could allow Reports to
contain parameters, and detect as such, and then when they run
OK, I now realized this code is shell script, not Makefile content.
Code changed to:
THREAD_CFLAGS = $THREAD_CFLAGS -D_REENTRANT
---
Larry Rosenman wrote:
Didn't seem to. Did you see my posts from fri/sat on
NP. We will get this fixed. I am still thinking about it, and will do
something when I get to that email.
I am trying to avoid having a template/* variable for each *_r function,
but that may be required. The try for *_r library and continue if you
can't find it just seems too risky. We
Didn't seem to. Did you see my posts from fri/sat on -hackers?
I included what DID work for me.
LER
--On Sunday, August 24, 2003 19:21:57 -0400 Bruce Momjian
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Larry Rosenman wrote:
On Aug 17 2003, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Did something changed on today's cvs.
This makes sense to me. I sense a TODO item :-)
(My dim and possibly incorrect memory of administering Ingres around 10
years ago was that it supported both raw devices and file system based
databases. We opted for a file system base, for reasons others have
mentioned here, but I seem to recall
I have finished the training in Atlanta, and I am back on the job;
going through email now.
Seems I have events scheduled every month or every other month for the
forseeable future. I have Mexico in September, Germany in November, and
Denmark in January. I also have possible events for October
Larry Rosenman wrote:
On Aug 17 2003, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Did something changed on today's cvs.
src/template/unixware is wrong on last line: THREAD_CFLAGS += -D_REENTRANT
should be THREAD_CFLAGS=$THREAD_CFLAGS -D_REENTRANT
No it shouldn't
The original patch worked just
On Sun, 24 Aug 2003, Bruce Momjian wrote:
I have to decide if I should continue in that role for the project. I
do think it is important for our visibility and for growing the
community.
That really should be up to you. Conferences are a great way to lift the
project's profile, and
following is taken from postgresql-7.3.2/src/backend/storage/lmgr/readme:
If we are setting a table level lock
both the blockId and tupleId (in an item pointer this is called
the position) are set to invalid, if it is a page level lock the
blockId is valid, while the
Gavin Sherry wrote:
On Sun, 24 Aug 2003, Bruce Momjian wrote:
I have to decide if I should continue in that role for the project. I
do think it is important for our visibility and for growing the
community.
That really should be up to you. Conferences are a great way to lift the
Can someone explain in succinct and general terms what the difference
between a NOTICE and a WARNING is? I'm currently examining the validity
of notice and warning messages throughout the backend, but I find these
categories to be applied inconsistently.
--
Peter Eisentraut [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Thomas,
On Sun, Aug 24, 2003 at 04:55:42PM -0400, Jason Tishler wrote:
On Thu, Aug 21, 2003 at 11:10:05AM -0500, Thomas Swan wrote:
On 8/8/2003 5:49 AM, Jason Tishler wrote:
Is this just the --with-openssl option? Does it build cleanly
under Cygwin? If so, would you like me to include
Hello:
I'm developing a TLS library in C# for my PostgreSQL ADO.NET Data
Provider, i can work well using the openssl test server, using:
openssl s_server -accept 443 -key server.key -cert server.crt -tls1 -bugs
But when i try to use it for connect to postgresql (7.4 on
Windows+Cygwin) i get
16 matches
Mail list logo
