Bruce Momjian wrote:
Our philosophy has never been to give people configuration options just
in case they might be valuable to them. If we did that, we would be
like Oracle.
We give config options only if we can't decide the best default. For
testing, you can have an #ifdef and we can test it
Jan Wieck wrote:
Bruce Momjian wrote:
Our philosophy has never been to give people configuration options just
in case they might be valuable to them. If we did that, we would be
like Oracle.
We give config options only if we can't decide the best default. For
testing, you can
Joe Conway [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Tom Lane wrote:
The pgstat patch has already been checked to my satisfaction, but the
datetime patch needs more eyeballs on it; anyone out there have time to
look at it?
FWIW, it looks good to me, seems to work as intended, and passes all
existing
On Fri, 14 Nov 2003 11:07:43, Josh Berkus wrote:
One thing I've not seen an answer to: does Postgres run acceptably on
other people's Solaris boxes? If this bug is preventing running on
Solaris at all, I'd say fix it ... Solaris is a major platform. If it
only affects users of one
Derek Morr wrote:
On Fri, 14 Nov 2003 11:07:43, Josh Berkus wrote:
One thing I've not seen an answer to: does Postgres run acceptably on
other people's Solaris boxes? If this bug is preventing running on
Solaris at all, I'd say fix it ... Solaris is a major platform. If it
only
Bruce Momjian [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Is there a TODO here?
You needn't add one: I hope to tackle this during the 7.5 dev cycle.
-Neil
---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 9: the planner will ignore your desire to choose an index scan if your
No luck on general, so I'll try here:
I'm trying to figure out what version of a source code I have. I know
it's a 7.2 release, but how can I find out of it's 7.2, 7.2.3, 7.2.4,
etc. FROM THE SOURCE CODE, not from compiling (it doesn't compile, it's
testing code).
Thanks
- Brandon
I made up a more thorough regression test for date input formats, and
found that there were still some cases that were rejected :-(. Attached
is a more complete patch that handles all month-name cases, and
explicitly can not change the behavior when there's not a textual month
name.
bpalmer [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I'm trying to figure out what version of a source code I have. I know
it's a 7.2 release, but how can I find out of it's 7.2, 7.2.3, 7.2.4,
etc. FROM THE SOURCE CODE, not from compiling (it doesn't compile, it's
testing code).
Look in configure.in:
Christopher Kings-Lynne wrote:
I made up a more thorough regression test for date input formats, and
found that there were still some cases that were rejected :-(. Attached
is a more complete patch that handles all month-name cases, and
explicitly can not change the behavior when there's not a
10 matches
Mail list logo
