Le Mardi 25 Novembre 2003 07:32, Randolf Richardson a crit :
I'm curious, has anyone consulted with a lawyer on this?
Yes, the lawyer concluded that the number 2003 had been both registered as a
trademark and a patented invention. Therefore, it is very likely that
Humanity will be able to jump
Joshua D. Drake wrote:
I seen that the configure is done with:
--with-krb5=/usr.
make sure that you have krb5-devel installed.
Unfortunately yes:
# rpm -qa | grep krb5
krb5-devel-1.2.7-14
krb5-server-1.2.7-14
krb5-server-1.2.7-10
pam_krb5-1.60-1
krb5-workstation-1.2.7-10
krb5-libs-1.2.7-10
I'm trying to port some replication code from 7.2 - 7.4 and am running
into a block.
In the file:
/src/backend/tcop/postgres.c
My diff was for:
void
pg_exec_query(char *query_string)
{
pg_exec_query_string(query_string, whereToSendOutput,
QueryContext);
}
But the
On Monday 01 December 2003 08:53 pm, Gaetano Mendola wrote:
Hi all,
I'm still experiencing problem trying to
rebuild the rpm from the file:
postgresql-7.4-0.5PGDG.src.rpm
I seen that the configure is done with:
--with-krb5=/usr.
You need to specify that you are building for Red Hat 9 on
Tony and Bryn Reina wrote:
1. Which parts of MSYS and Mingw are needed for the building a Win32
version of PostgreSQL?
There are several packages listed on the Mingw website:
MingGW-3.1.0-1.exe
mingw-utils-0.2
mingw-runtime-3.2
msys-1.0.9.exe
msysDTK-1.0.1.exe
binutils
gcc
win32api-2.4
We (mostly Bruce, Tom, Peter, and I) have been having a discussion on
the PATCHES list regarding some new functionality related to read-only
GUC variables. The net result is pasted at the bottom of this post. Here
is a link to the discussion:
Lamar Owen wrote:
On Monday 01 December 2003 08:53 pm, Gaetano Mendola wrote:
Hi all,
I'm still experiencing problem trying to
rebuild the rpm from the file:
postgresql-7.4-0.5PGDG.src.rpm
I seen that the configure is done with:
--with-krb5=/usr.
You need to specify that you are building for
On Tue, 2 Dec 2003, Joe Conway wrote:
We (mostly Bruce, Tom, Peter, and I) have been having a discussion on
the PATCHES list regarding some new functionality related to read-only
GUC variables. The net result is pasted at the bottom of this post. Here
is a link to the discussion:
Hi all,
I'm working on getting BackendFork converted to a fork/exec model, and have
hit the following wall.
All the ShmemInitHash structures are allocated using DynaHashCxt. Clearly,
this context is going to have to be shared across backends in the fork/exec
case, but I can't see a non-trivial
Kind people,
As a perl weenie, I'm used to being able to do things with regexes
like
$text =~ s/(foo|bar|baz)/NO UNIX WEENIES HERE/;
$got_it = $1;
While PL/Perl is great, it's not available everywhere, and I'd like to
be able to grab atoms from a regex match in, say, a SELECT. Is there
some
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
The above is an operation that would not help me a lot, but a way of
performing currval() without knowing the sequence name would be good.
You could do this with a function. Here is a quick one in SQL:
CREATE OR REPLACE FUNCTION
On Tue, Dec 02, 2003 at 07:52:57PM -0600, David Fetter wrote:
As a perl weenie, I'm used to being able to do things with regexes
like
$text =~ s/(foo|bar|baz)/NO UNIX WEENIES HERE/;
$got_it = $1;
While PL/Perl is great, it's not available everywhere, and I'd like to
be able to grab
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (David Fetter) writes:
While PL/Perl is great, it's not available everywhere, and I'd like to
be able to grab atoms from a regex match in, say, a SELECT. Is there
some way to get access to them?
There's a three-parameter variant of substring() that allows extraction
of a
Claudio Natoli [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
All the ShmemInitHash structures are allocated using DynaHashCxt.
I'm not sure if you're confusing backend-local hashes with shared
hashes, or hash control headers with the actual shared data. But
the above is a false statement. DynaHashCxt is not
On Tuesday 02 December 2003 06:29 pm, Gaetano Mendola wrote:
Lamar Owen wrote:
You need to specify that you are building for Red Hat 9 on the command
I'll try.
Ok.
PS: the 7.4 will be remembered as the longest release to be developed
and for the longest period needed in order to have the
Please take a quick peak at it ...
ftp://ftp.postgresql.org/pub/source/v7.3.5
Marc G. Fournier Hub.Org Networking Services (http://www.hub.org)
Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Yahoo!: yscrappy ICQ: 7615664
---(end of
I'm not sure if you're confusing backend-local hashes with shared
hashes, or hash control headers with the actual shared data. But
the above is a false statement. DynaHashCxt is not shared.
No, wasn't confused over that. Was confused over something else though :-)
Shared hashes are a
Claudio Natoli [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
So this means we'll have to pull relHash out of the shared FreeSpaceMap
structure and make it a variable in it's own right?
Hm. The freespace.c code is relatively new and might not be jumping
through all of the hoops it should be jumping through. My
Claudio Natoli [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
So this means we'll have to pull relHash out of the shared FreeSpaceMap
structure and make it a variable in it's own right?
Hm. The freespace.c code is relatively new and might not be jumping
through all of the hoops it should be jumping through.
Martha Stewart called it a Good Thing when Randolf Richardson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
The count(*) information can be revisioned too, am I wrong ? I'm able
to create a trigger that store the count(*) information in a special
table, why not implement the same in a way builded in ?
Then
On Mon, 01 Dec 2003 13:32:10 -0500, Tom Lane [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Manfred Koizar [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
comparetup_index() compares two IndexTuples. The structure
IndexTupleData consists basically of not much more than an ItemPointer,
and the patch is not much more than adding a
21 matches
Mail list logo