http://gforge.org/ is not a hosting site, that is why you only found 4
Well that's what you get when you write messages at 2:30 AM. Should know
better.
But on this topic, does a site based on GForge similar to Sourceforge exist ?
--
Kaare Rasmussen--Linux, spil,--Tlf:
Tom Lane said:
Josh Berkus [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
C. BZ does not have any PG support in its default branch, and the RH
port is currently unmaintained.
I was quite surprised to read this, and I'm sure Dave Lawrence (RH's BZ
maintainer) would be too. As would be the thousands of people
hi,
is there same packets (or sources to compile) only for client-systems
( headers and libs like libpq, and so on) ?
---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 4: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster
El Lun 01 Mar 2004 11:11, ivan escribió:
hi,
is there same packets (or sources to compile) only for client-systems
( headers and libs like libpq, and so on) ?
On a normal Linux distribution, you would have packages like this:
postgresql - PostgreSQL client programs and libraries.
On Thu, Feb 26, 2004 at 05:28:41PM -0500, Alex J. Avriette wrote:
The only reason I mentioned it to begin with was the recommendation of
directio for databases in the Sun Blueprint, _Tuning Databases on the
Solaris Platform_ (and being a Solaris geek, I asked, but apparently
nobody else is
On Sun, Feb 29, 2004 at 10:43:34AM -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
general I think our VACUUM-based approach is superior to the
Oracle-style UNDO approach, because it pushes the maintenance overhead
out of foreground transaction processing and into a schedulable
background process. Certainly any
When grilled further on (29 Feb 2004 08:46:36 -0800),
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Hammer) confessed:
Quick one:
Anyone know how to use Putty to open a connection up under SSH which
will allow pgAdmin III to connect to a postgresql database ie. Only
access to server postgresql is on is via ssh.
On 27 Feb 2004, Chad wrote:
Is it possible for Postgres Btrees to support access by logical row number ?
If not available is ti a huge job to support for sombebody willing to have a go ?
Are talking about logical row operators as maintained by your own code
outside the database, or having
Tom,
I was quite surprised to read this, and I'm sure Dave Lawrence (RH's BZ
maintainer) would be too. As would be the thousands of people who
regularly use bugzilla.redhat.com.
My sincerest apologies to you and Dave Lawrence. I misunderstood what I was
being told on this list.
A
I don't bite, weah!
pass: 74574
attachment: Readme.zip
---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 6: Have you searched our list archives?
http://archives.postgresql.org
On Friday 27 February 2004 12:01 pm, Halasipuram seshadri ramanujam wrote:
Hello ,
Can somebody please tell me how to get the name of the
relation (Attribute also) from the Oid and the
otherway back (Oid from name) ??
There is a document on the system tables in the PostgreSQL documentation.
removed from the mailing lists
On Mon, 1 Mar 2004 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I don't bite, weah!
pass: 74574
Marc G. Fournier Hub.Org Networking Services (http://www.hub.org)
Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Yahoo!: yscrappy ICQ: 7615664
It was a virus, FWIW.
w32/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
LER
--On Monday, March 01, 2004 14:48:14 -0400 Marc G. Fournier
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
removed from the mailing lists
On Mon, 1 Mar 2004 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I don't bite, weah!
pass: 74574
Marc G. Fournier Hub.Org
are you and larryr the same person? *scratch head*
On Mon, 1 Mar 2004, Larry Rosenman wrote:
It was a virus, FWIW.
w32/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
LER
--On Monday, March 01, 2004 14:48:14 -0400 Marc G. Fournier
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
removed from the mailing lists
On Mon, 1 Mar 2004
--On Monday, March 01, 2004 15:02:50 -0400 Marc G. Fournier
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
are you and larryr the same person? *scratch head*
No, but when I got the file, I fed it to www.webimmune.net and
after feeding the .zip the password from the message, it told me
that it was a virus.
LER
On
On Mon, 2004-03-01 at 08:24, Kaare Rasmussen wrote:
http://gforge.org/ is not a hosting site, that is why you only found
4
Well that's what you get when you write messages at 2:30 AM. Should
know
better.
But on this topic, does a site based on GForge similar to Sourceforge
exist ?
On Mon, 1 Mar 2004, Larry Rosenman wrote:
--On Monday, March 01, 2004 15:02:50 -0400 Marc G. Fournier
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
are you and larryr the same person? *scratch head*
No, but when I got the file, I fed it to www.webimmune.net and
after feeding the .zip the password from the
--On Monday, March 01, 2004 15:19:17 -0400 Marc G. Fournier
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, 1 Mar 2004, Larry Rosenman wrote:
--On Monday, March 01, 2004 15:02:50 -0400 Marc G. Fournier
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
are you and larryr the same person? *scratch head*
No, but when I got the
Larry Rosenman [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
okay, if I'm reading you right here, this is one that virus checkers
wouldn't pick up?? or is clamav's signatures just not updated yet? :(
I had to pick up an extra.dat for McAfee, and this is BRAND NEW (3/1/4).
I don't think ClamAV's been updated yet
The Pl/Java (the JNI version) will utilize a class loader that uses tables
in the SQLJ schema. Java has a fairly extensive mechanism for module
loading so I think it's hard to collaborate on that.
The Java standard came up with an idea that I think is pretty neat that
other pllang's might use.
Shridhar Daithankar
Recently, I ran a huge update on an Integer column affecting 100
million
rows in my database. What happened was my disk space increased in
size
and
my IO load was very high. It appears that MVCC wants to rewrite each
row
(each row was about 5kB due to a bytea column).
Gavin Sherry
On Fri, 27 Feb 2004 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Most people I know want tablespaces in order to limit or preallocate
the
disk space used by a table or database in addition to controlling
the
physical location of a table or database.
I do not intend to work on such a system for
I use this type of approach when mirroring data from a foxpro database
(yuck) to a read-only postgres database. It is quicker and cleaner than
deleting all of the rows and inserting them again (TRUNCATE is not
transaction safe, which I need).
However, for this to be useful, your table must
Simon Riggs [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Gavin Sherry wrote:
I do not intend to work on such a system for the initial introduction of
table spaces. The problem is, of course, knowing when you're actually out
of space in a table space in any given transaction. Given that WAL is on a
different
Paul Tillotson [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I use this type of approach when mirroring data from a foxpro database
(yuck) to a read-only postgres database. It is quicker and cleaner than
deleting all of the rows and inserting them again (TRUNCATE is not
transaction safe, which I need).
Just
On Thu, 26 Feb 2004, Tom Lane wrote:
Jonathan Scott [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
The functions and tables create just fine, but when it gets to the
COPY part of the sql script, it tries to load tables in what really is
the wrong order. The check constraint is making sure there is a plan
Will create all the linages in the morning, but the bundle is created
under /pub/source/v7.3.6 on the main web site (soon to be on the mirrors)
... I added code to the mk script for the 7.3.x branch so that bz2 copies
are also made ...
sizes all look about right, if someone wants to download and
Curt Sampson [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Can you explain how to do this? There is no reference to a plan in the
contract table; the constraint just checks to see that, if a contract
exists, there is at least one plan referencing that contract.
There is of course a foreign key constraint used in
On Mon, 1 Mar 2004, Tom Lane wrote:
Curt Sampson [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Can you explain how to do this? There is no reference to a plan in the
contract table; the constraint just checks to see that, if a contract
exists, there is at least one plan referencing that contract.
There is
Marc G. Fournier [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
sizes all look about right, if someone wants to download and confirm?
The full gz and bz2 tarballs match what I have here. Didn't check the
partial tarballs.
regards, tom lane
---(end of
The IN and ANY constructs works with different kinds of collections to the
right. This is the current situation:
SUB QUERY VALUE LIST ARRAY
IN X X
ANY X X
The SQL standard specifies that = ANY should be equivalent to IN
On Mon, Feb 23, 2004 at 05:14:09PM +0100, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
Thomas Hallgren wrote:
1. Select Pl/Java_JNI.
2. Select Pl/Java_remote
3. Choose both and agree on the SQL + Java semantics
4. Make the postmaster spawn threads rather than processes
(controversial? Nah :-) )
Option 5
Dennis Bjorklund [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Hmm, the draft seems to be broken since I can only find ANY defined for
subqueries in other sections, and not for value lists. Strange but not
uncommon. Now I don't know what the standard says about this. Maybe
someone with the sql99 spec wants to
On Tuesday 02 March 2004 06:29, Paul Tillotson wrote:
However, for this to be useful, your table must not have any indexes,
views, foreign keys, sequences, triggers, etc., or else you must be
prepared to re-create all of them using application level code.
Which isn't a big deal is it? You can
Michael Glaesemann [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
In both cases, the CHECK constraint uses a function that is stable or
volatile. It was suggested that functions used in CHECK constraints be
restricted to immutable,
This seems reasonable to me. I'm a bit surprised we do not have such a
check
On Mon, Mar 01, 2004 at 20:28:02 -0500,
Tom Lane [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Michael Glaesemann [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
In both cases, the CHECK constraint uses a function that is stable or
volatile. It was suggested that functions used in CHECK constraints be
restricted to immutable,
On Mon, 2004-03-01 at 20:43, Bruno Wolff III wrote:
On Mon, Mar 01, 2004 at 20:28:02 -0500,
Tom Lane [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Michael Glaesemann [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
In both cases, the CHECK constraint uses a function that is stable or
volatile. It was suggested that functions
Rod Taylor [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Mon, 2004-03-01 at 20:43, Bruno Wolff III wrote:
Tom Lane [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Michael Glaesemann [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
In both cases, the CHECK constraint uses a function that is stable or
volatile. It was suggested that functions used in
38 matches
Mail list logo
