David Fetter wrote:
As background, I'd like to go over our policy of, "The code patch must
be accompanied by any doc patches that it implies."
Although it is worth noting this policy is not religiously followed
anyway (e.g. the recent roles patch). I think we basically assume that
the person
My last one appears to have vanished. Did this get through?
Cheers,
D
--
David Fetter [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://fetter.org/
phone: +1 510 893 6100 mobile: +1 415 235 3778
Remember to vote!
---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 1: if posting/reading throu
Folks,
I'm sure I'm not the first to bring up this way of doing pg_upgrade,
but perhaps I can help seed a fruitful discussion on the matter.
As background, I'd like to go over our policy of, "The code patch must
be accompanied by any doc patches that it implies." I believe that
this policy is go
There were several reports of "unable to read/write" on Pg8.0.x win32 port:
http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-bugs/2005-02/msg00181.php
I encounter this several times and finally I catch the GetLastError()
number. It is
32, ERROR_SHARING_VIOLATION
The process cannot access the file be
Andrew Dunstan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> further (anecdotal) data point: I have usually seen this after doing a
> number of builds. Rebooting seems to cure the problem (and that's
> happened today agin - I have just seen 2 builds work). Maybe some sort
> of strange shmem corruption?
Hmmm ..
further (anecdotal) data point: I have usually seen this after doing a
number of builds. Rebooting seems to cure the problem (and that's
happened today agin - I have just seen 2 builds work). Maybe some sort
of strange shmem corruption?
cheers
andrew
Tom Lane wrote:
Andrew Dunstan <[EMAI
On Wed, 2005-07-13 at 17:57 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> I'm not certain how important that really is; it was part of
> Vadim's original design for WAL and no one ever particularly
> questioned it.
Anybody setting checkpoint_segments high is likely to have a dedicated
WAL disk anyway, which easily giv
Victor Yegorov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Is it possible to somehow determine index's attribute number that is target
> one for given scankey?
sk_attno?
regards, tom lane
---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 5: don't forget to in
Alvaro Herrera <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> The point is that in general, the 16 MiB figure is correct, but in
> pathological cases there can be up to two WAL segments on disk per
> checkpoint_segment, so 32 MiB.
The reason for this is that after a checkpoint finishes, we recycle
WAL files up to
Andrew Dunstan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I never got a reply to this, but I am still seeing it from time to time
> - twice today in fact. Any suggestions?
I've been puzzled by that too. It seems to indicate that the syscache
inval message that the COMMIT should send is either not getting sen
Hello.
Is it possible to somehow determine index's attribute number that is target
one for given scankey?
I've checked nbtree AM code and found no evidence of such an ability. I need
that, because I'm storing each indexed value only once in a form of index
tuple, consisting of only 1 attribute.
On Wed, Jul 13, 2005 at 12:53:57PM -0700, Joshua D. Drake wrote:
> Tom made mention earlier this week that upping the checkpoint segments
> might be a bad idea because we are committing someone to 32 megs per
> segment. I thought it odd at the time but I figured it was an 8.1 thing.
>
> As I revi
"Joshua D. Drake" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I heard mention from Berkus that these may be going by the wayside. Any
> truth to that?
Tatsuo put up some benchmark numbers showing that they can be of use,
so unless somebody refutes those results, I guess they stay. (I have
doubts about the res
Hello,
Tom made mention earlier this week that upping the checkpoint segments
might be a bad idea because we are committing someone to 32 megs per
segment. I thought it odd at the time but I figured it was an 8.1 thing.
As I review the 8.1dev postgresql.conf the checkpoint_segments option
still
I never got a reply to this, but I am still seeing it from time to time
- twice today in fact. Any suggestions?
cheers
andrew
Andrew Dunstan wrote:
I am consistently seeing the regression failure shown below on my
Windows machine. See
http://www.pgbuildfarm.org/cgi-bin/show_log.pl?nm=lo
Tom Lane wrote:
Andrew Dunstan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
which looks very odd indeed, especially:
-L -L../../../src/backend -L../../../src/port -L/c/tcl/lib C:/Perl/lib/CORE
-lperl58
Ah, I see the problem:
ifeq ($(PORTNAME), win32)
perl_archlibexp := $(subst \,/,$(pe
On Wed, Jul 13, 2005 at 01:24:17PM -0400, Andrew Dunstan wrote:
> >In any case, I've cleared the conflict and I'm running a build right
> >now.
octopus is building again, and is back to the behavior I mentioned in
http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-bugs/2005-07/msg00096.php. Is this
something th
Hello,
I heard mention from Berkus that these may be going by the wayside. Any
truth to that?
Sincerely,
Joshua D. Drake
--
Your PostgreSQL solutions provider, Command Prompt, Inc.
24x7 support - 1.800.492.2240, programming, and consulting
Home of PostgreSQL Replicator, plPHP, plPerlNG and p
Hello,
Will this be an option when 8.1 releases? I know there has been some
*ahem* disagreement.
Sincerely,
Joshua D. Drake
--
Your PostgreSQL solutions provider, Command Prompt, Inc.
24x7 support - 1.800.492.2240, programming, and consulting
Home of PostgreSQL Replicator, plPHP, plPerlNG and
On Wed, 13 Jul 2005, Affan Salman wrote:
On 7/7/05, Darren Alcorn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I was interested as to if there were plans to develop SQL99 nested
tables. I know with AJAX(tm) starting to grow in popularity that the
XML features of SQL2003 would prove useful for EnterpriseDB.
Al
Jim C. Nasby wrote:
Turns out there was a cvs conflict. Doh!
Ouch. I have repeatedly warned buildfarm owners not to make any changes
or run builds in buildfarm's local CVS repo. Use a copy if necessary.
Hmm... would probably be a good idea to have the script check for
conflicts and th
Andrew Dunstan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> which looks very odd indeed, especially:
> -L -L../../../src/backend -L../../../src/port -L/c/tcl/lib C:/Perl/lib/CORE
> -lperl58
Ah, I see the problem:
ifeq ($(PORTNAME), win32)
perl_archlibexp := $(subst \,/,$(perl_archlibexp))
perl_privlibexp :
Tom Lane wrote:
Andrew Dunstan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
This patch seems to have broken builds on Windows and other boxes (e.g.
buildfarm's octopus, a FreeBSD box). Maybe this should be reverted until
we find a more robust solution :-(
The only thing I see any evidence for is a
On 7/7/05, David Fetter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > It would need to be a fairly strong one, given that they basically
> > violate the relational model. If what you're really interested in
> > is XML data support, then I'd suggest focusing on that instead.
>
> XML data support would be best if
On 7/7/05, Darren Alcorn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I was interested as to if there were plans to develop SQL99 nested
> tables. I know with AJAX(tm) starting to grow in popularity that the
> XML features of SQL2003 would prove useful for EnterpriseDB.
>
Although this discussion seems to be hea
Andrew Dunstan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> This patch seems to have broken builds on Windows and other boxes (e.g.
> buildfarm's octopus, a FreeBSD box). Maybe this should be reverted until
> we find a more robust solution :-(
The only thing I see any evidence for is a broken version of gmake
On Wed, 2005-07-13 at 14:02 +0100, Richard Huxton wrote:
> Sounds very useful - even for my small systems. Does it/would it work on
> an ordinary table (for those cases currently using UNION ALL)?
I'm looking into that aspect right now.
I see no reason why it shouldn't work for UNION ALL views/q
This patch seems to have broken builds on Windows and other boxes (e.g.
buildfarm's octopus, a FreeBSD box). Maybe this should be reverted until
we find a more robust solution :-(
cheers
andrew
Bruce Momjian wrote:
Patch applied. Thanks.
-
Hi,
I use PostgreSQL 8.0.3 and following associated
drivers :
postgresql-8.0-311.jdbc2.jar
postgresql-8.0-311.jdbc2ee.jar
postgresql-8.0-311.jdbc3.jar
I want to use CachedRowSetImpl to populate one
row in the following table :
CREATE TABLE "Form2"( form
Sounds very useful - even for my small systems. Does it/would it work on
an ordinary table (for those cases currently using UNION ALL)?
--
Richard Huxton
Archonet Ltd
---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 5: don't forget to increase your free space map
This seems to have gone AWOL in the email ether, so I am resending.
Original Message
Tom Lane wrote:
Andrew Dunstan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
I have just noticed this code in plperl.c:
hv_store(plperl_proc_hash, internal_proname, proname_len,
A Guide to the Constraint Exclusion Feature
===
Simon Riggs 2ndQuadrant [EMAIL PROTECTED]
INTRODUCTION
Constraint Exclusion (CE) is an optimizer patch submitted for PostgreSQL
8.1. CE aims to greatly improve the performance for certain types of
com
On Tue, 2005-07-12 at 14:56 -0700, Joshua D. Drake wrote:
> > It'd be relatively easy I think to extract the current FSM statistics
> > in a function that could be invoked separately from VACUUM. Not sure
> > how we ought to return 'em though --- the VACUUM way of a bunch of INFO
> > messages is a
Hi,
Does PostgreSQL do the following optimisation:
SELECT * FROM diary WHERE date = '2005-05-01' ORDER BY date;
or in fact even better (for my situation)
SELECT * FROM diary WHERE date BETWEEN '2005-05-01' AND '2005-05-01'
ORDER BY date;
Does it know that the input to the sort routine is al
34 matches
Mail list logo
