[HACKERS] Fwd: [pgsql-hackers-win32] Build with Visual Studio MSVC

2006-05-07 Thread Gurjeet Singh
(missed the mailing list last time) Hi William, Thanks for the steps to succeed with vcproject. I am sure that there will be a few more tweaks involved (like setting VC's include path etc.). I will try to build it and consult/inform you if there is any deviation from the README. This will

Re: [HACKERS] [pgsql-hackers-win32] Build with Visual Studio MSVC

2006-05-07 Thread Gurjeet Singh
On 5/5/06, Jonah H. Harris [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On 5/5/06, Gurjeet Singh [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: If it is such a 'simple porting', may I ask why hasn't it been attempted successfuly in so many years of PG's history? Because most of use don't use Windows... I thought I said that. But a

[HACKERS] Demoting the width part of EXPLAIN

2006-05-07 Thread Greg Sabino Mullane
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Seeing as how width is so unused relative to the other items in the explain output, how about removing it from the normal explain output and requiring people to do an explain verbose if they really need to see it? It would have the virtue of

[HACKERS] Compiling PL/Perl and Pl/Python on x86_64

2006-05-07 Thread imacat
Dear all, I cannot compile PL/Perl and PL/Python under x86_64. I'm running Intel Pentium D 3.2GHz Dual-core, Debian GNU/Linux AMD64 port, kernel 2.6.16.14, gcc 3.4.4, glibc 2.3.2, perl 5.8.8, Python 2.4.3. [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~ % uname -a Linux yuki 2.6.16.14-allmods #1 SMP Sat May 6 18:25:11

Re: [HACKERS] Demoting the width part of EXPLAIN

2006-05-07 Thread Jim C. Nasby
On Sun, May 07, 2006 at 04:03:45PM -, Greg Sabino Mullane wrote: Seeing as how width is so unused relative to the other items in the explain output, how about removing it from the normal explain output and requiring people to do an explain verbose if they really need to see it? It would

Re: [HACKERS] Demoting the width part of EXPLAIN

2006-05-07 Thread Tom Lane
Greg Sabino Mullane [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Seeing as how width is so unused relative to the other items in the explain output, Huh? It's a critical part of the cost calculations for some things (eg, sort and hash operations). regards, tom lane

Re: [HACKERS] Compiling PL/Perl and Pl/Python on x86_64

2006-05-07 Thread Tom Lane
imacat [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: I cannot compile PL/Perl and PL/Python under x86_64. Works fine for me (without any tinkering with flags) on Fedora Core 4. Maybe you don't have 64-bit versions of the perl and python libraries? regards, tom lane

Re: [HACKERS] Compiling PL/Perl and Pl/Python on x86_64

2006-05-07 Thread imacat
On Sun, 07 May 2006 13:09:48 -0400 Tom Lane [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: imacat [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: I cannot compile PL/Perl and PL/Python under x86_64. Works fine for me (without any tinkering with flags) on Fedora Core 4. Maybe you don't have 64-bit versions of the perl and python

Re: [HACKERS] Fwd: [pgsql-hackers-win32] Build with Visual Studio MSVC

2006-05-07 Thread Thomas Hallgren
Gurjeet Singh wrote: Thomas, I love the idea of eclipse; any platform, any language, one IDE. I am downloading it right now. Can you please send in the steps that you perform to setup the environment, including mingw toolkit; I will try to grow on that. My setup is pretty basic. I can't