Max Bowsher wrote:
On 20/08/10 19:07, Magnus Hagander wrote:
On Fri, Aug 20, 2010 at 19:56, Max Bowsher m...@f2s.com wrote:
On 20/08/10 18:43, Magnus Hagander wrote:
On Fri, Aug 20, 2010 at 19:41, Max Bowsher m...@f2s.com wrote:
On 20/08/10 18:30, Magnus Hagander wrote:
On Fri, Aug 20, 2010
The current system give people the completely false impression that
7.0 and 7.4 are somehow similar.
On what planet?
on every single planet of the universe, except the one called
postgrearth, whose inhabitants breathe sql and eat messages from
postgresql mailing lists... :-)
most people I
On 08/20/2010 09:04 PM, David E. Wheeler wrote:
On Aug 20, 2010, at 12:02 PM, Greg Stark wrote:
Again, it means the format would be consistent. Always three integers. Nice
thing about Semantic Versions is that if you append any ASCII string to the
third integer, it automatically means less
On Fri, Aug 20, 2010 at 15:49, Tom Lane t...@sss.pgh.pa.us wrote:
Magnus Hagander mag...@hagander.net writes:
Attached is a patch that adds columns to pg_stat_*_tables for number
of [auto]vacuum and [auto]analyze runs on a table, completing the
current one that just had the last time these
On Aug 21, 2010, at 1:45 AM, Stefan Kaltenbrunner wrote:
hmm FWIW I would interpret something like 9.0.1B4 as the forth beta
release for the first point release of the major release 9.0 bis seems
stupid and is not anything we have done before.
It does't make sense for PostgreSQL, no.
You
On Aug 20, 2010, at 8:27 PM, KaiGai Kohei kai...@kaigai.gr.jp wrote:
(2010/08/20 23:34), Robert Haas wrote:
2010/8/19 KaiGai Koheikai...@ak.jp.nec.com:
I think our standard criteria for the inclusion of hooks is that you
must demonstrate that the hook can be used to do something interesting
On Sat, Aug 21, 2010 at 4:29 AM, Sergio A. Kessler
sergiokess...@gmail.com wrote:
on every single planet of the universe, except the one called
postgrearth, whose inhabitants breathe sql and eat messages from
postgresql mailing lists... :-)
most people I know, think 8.1 is just 8.0 with some
On Sat, 2010-08-21 at 17:00 +0100, Greg Stark wrote:
On Sat, Aug 21, 2010 at 4:29 AM, Sergio A. Kessler
sergiokess...@gmail.com wrote:
on every single planet of the universe, except the one called
postgrearth, whose inhabitants breathe sql and eat messages from
postgresql mailing lists...
Steven Schlansker ste...@trumpet.io writes:
Anyway, it looks like this is actually a BSD bug which got copy +
pasted into Apple's Darwin source -
http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-i18n/2007-September/000157.html
I've applied a patch for this to HEAD 9.0:
Joshua D. Drake j...@commandprompt.com writes:
PostgreSQL is a user space project. Yes we have a solid core of -hackers
but our wider use is a place where hackers don't exist. User space
developers do. I.e; PHP people.
This is utter nonsense. We're a database, not a desktop.
People who even
On Sat, Aug 21, 2010 at 5:51 PM, Joshua D. Drake j...@commandprompt.com wrote:
There was *NEVER* a Windows NT 4.0.x, there was Windows NT 4.0 SP2.
I'm not sure what you're point is here. There was a NT 4.0 followed by
SP1 through SP6. followed by NT 5.0, 5.1, 5.2, 6.0, 6.1, and 7.0. They
also
On Sat, 2010-08-21 at 13:12 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
Joshua D. Drake j...@commandprompt.com writes:
PostgreSQL is a user space project. Yes we have a solid core of -hackers
but our wider use is a place where hackers don't exist. User space
developers do. I.e; PHP people.
This is utter
On Sat, Aug 21, 2010 at 03:34:35AM -, Greg Sabino Mullane wrote:
It's possible that we're arguing for the sake of arguing
No it's not! ;)
Yes it is! ;)
It's nice to be able to keep track of the major version number
without running out of fingers (at least for a few more years) and
On Sat, Aug 21, 2010 at 5:51 PM, Joshua D. Drake j...@commandprompt.com wrote:
PostgreSQL is a user space project. Yes we have a solid core of -hackers
but our wider use is a place where hackers don't exist. User space
developers do. I.e; PHP people.
Uhm
On Sat, Aug 21, 2010 at 6:24 PM, Greg Stark gsst...@mit.edu wrote:
I'm not sure what you're point is here.
Argh! This thread is almost enough to make me believe in adding
recalls to smtp. I can't even blame this one on my flaky keyboard this
time.
--
greg
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing
On Sat, 2010-08-21 at 18:24 +0100, Greg Stark wrote:
On Sat, Aug 21, 2010 at 5:51 PM, Joshua D. Drake j...@commandprompt.com
wrote:
There was *NEVER* a Windows NT 4.0.x, there was Windows NT 4.0 SP2.
I'm not sure what you're point is here. There was a NT 4.0 followed by
SP1 through SP6.
On Sat, 2010-08-21 at 18:35 +0100, Greg Stark wrote:
On Sat, Aug 21, 2010 at 6:24 PM, Greg Stark gsst...@mit.edu wrote:
I'm not sure what you're point is here.
Argh! This thread is almost enough to make me believe in adding
recalls to smtp. I can't even blame this one on my flaky keyboard
On Sat, Aug 21, 2010 at 6:37 PM, Joshua D. Drake j...@commandprompt.com wrote:
Q. Do we have a problem?
A. Some of our contributors, even some very experienced contributors
feel we do.
Q. What is the problem we are trying to solve?
A. That users, especially those that are less technical are
We agreed that we ought to do $SUBJECT in 9.1. Right offhand the
outlines of a cleaner solution look pretty obvious:
* Create a datatype with the same internal representation as TEXT;
make its input and recv routines throw errors, while the output
routines just reuse textout/textsend.
* Provide
On 21 August 2010 20:30, Tom Lane t...@sss.pgh.pa.us wrote:
* Change all system catalog columns holding expression trees to be
declared as this type.
*snip*
We could go with something like pg_parse_tree, perhaps. Or maybe
that's overthinking it.
How about pg_expr_tree?
--
Thom Brown
Or at least to RTFM if they don't.
If this were true, this thread wouldn't be as long as it is, nor would
our mailing lists be anywhere near as busy as they are.
This thread is as long as it is principally because people generally
bikeshed about things that are easy to understand, and are fun
On Aug 21, 2010, at 3:30 PM, Tom Lane t...@sss.pgh.pa.us wrote:
We agreed that we ought to do $SUBJECT in 9.1.
One argument against this is that it might cause the current fix to get less
testing.
...Robert
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes
Robert Haas robertmh...@gmail.com writes:
On Aug 21, 2010, at 3:30 PM, Tom Lane t...@sss.pgh.pa.us wrote:
We agreed that we ought to do $SUBJECT in 9.1.
One argument against this is that it might cause the current fix to get less
testing.
Less testing than what?
On Aug 21, 2010, at 4:23 PM, Tom Lane t...@sss.pgh.pa.us wrote:
Robert Haas robertmh...@gmail.com writes:
On Aug 21, 2010, at 3:30 PM, Tom Lane t...@sss.pgh.pa.us wrote:
We agreed that we ought to do $SUBJECT in 9.1.
One argument against this is that it might cause the current fix to get
I don´t have any problem with PostgreSQL version numbering, to the contrary.
The
only thing I didn´t like was Postgres95, but I didn´t use Pg then. But since
then it´s _consistent_ and I really appreciate that. I could live with, say,
version 9.12.0 in a dozend years. I accept the alpha, beta
While hacking around, I noticed that a lot of makeVar() calls could be
refactored into some convenience functions, to save some redundancy and
so that the unusual call patterns stand out better. Useful?
Index: src/backend/commands/tablecmds.c
Peter Eisentraut pete...@gmx.net writes:
While hacking around, I noticed that a lot of makeVar() calls could be
refactored into some convenience functions, to save some redundancy and
so that the unusual call patterns stand out better. Useful?
I'm not real thrilled with importing
pg_archivecleanup -d (=verbose/DEBUG mode) mainly emits 2 types of messages:
pg_archivecleanup: keep WAL file 00010002 and later
and:
pg_archivecleanup: removing file
/var/data2/pg_stuff/dump/hotprime/replication_archive/0001001B
I found it a bit annoying to
Josh Berkus wrote:
On further reflection, though: since we put in the BufferAccessStrategy
code, which was in 8.3, the background writer isn't *supposed* to be
very much involved in writing pages that are dirtied by VACUUM. VACUUM
runs in a small ring of buffers and is supposed to have
29 matches
Mail list logo