On tis, 2010-09-21 at 18:31 -0400, Bruce Momjian wrote:
Also, doesn't some SQL standard require oids, so we should have a way
to enable them by default for all tables?
From some DB2 example:
CREATE TYPE BusinessUnit_t AS
(Name VARCHAR(20),
Headcount INT);
CREATE TABLE BusinessUnit OF
I haven't quite finished reviewing this, but here is the position so
far. I'm going to continue with some performance and other tests, but
I'm posting this for discussion in the mean time.
1) General patch issues
- applies cleanly and passes regression
- one small warning with ecpg parser
Hi,
On 09/21/2010 05:48 PM, Kevin Grittner wrote:
OK, I'd say it's a little rough yet, but it works. Is this
reasonable?:
http://git.postgresql.org/gitweb?p=users/kgrittn/postgres.git;a=commitdiff;h=b8eca245ab63725d0fbfc3b5969f4a17fc765f2c
I only get a: 404 - Unknown commit object on that
On 22/09/10 03:25, Joshua D. Drake wrote:
Why is this in the config file at all. It should be:
synchronous_replication = TRUE/FALSE
Umm, what does this do?
then
ALTER CLUSTER ENABLE REPLICATION FOR FOO;
ALTER CLUSTER SET keep_connect ON FOO TO TRUE;
Or some such thing.
I like a
How can I increase the stack depth limit ? Is it only by modifying the
postgres.conf file, but there I cannot increase the stack depth beyond 4
MB.
Actually, my problem is that, when I set the stack base address of the
child thread using the POSIX library function pthread_setstackaddr(), I
am
Hey all,
Okay, as Robert points, 0 code in successful messages seems as waste
of bytes. But according to the documentation, All messages emitted by the
PostgreSQL server are assigned five-character error codes that follow the
SQL
standard's conventions for SQLSTATE codes. - the first sentence
On 21/09/10 18:12, Tom Lane wrote:
Heikki Linnakangasheikki.linnakan...@enterprisedb.com writes:
On 21/09/10 11:52, Thom Brown wrote:
My fear would be standby.conf would be edited by users who don't
really know XML and then we'd have 3 different styles of config to
tell the user to edit.
Hi,
On 09/21/2010 08:05 PM, Simon Riggs wrote:
Hmm, no reason? The reason is that the alternative is that the session
would hang until a standby arrived that offered that level of service.
Why would you want that behaviour? Would you really request that option?
I think I now agree with Simon
On 22/09/10 11:14, sub...@cse.iitb.ac.in wrote:
How can I increase the stack depth limit ? Is it only by modifying the
postgres.conf file, but there I cannot increase the stack depth beyond 4
MB.
Actually, my problem is that, when I set the stack base address of the
child thread using the
[moving to pgsql-hackers; this isn't the simple bug I initially
suspected it might be]
On 20/09/10 03:10, Tom Lane wrote:
Craig Ringer cr...@postnewspapers.com.au writes:
One of the correctly encoded messages is Unexpected EOF received on
client connection
One of the incorrectly encoded
Hi all!
It seems that the git move has broken the generation of the automatic
snapshot tarballs - has anybody yet looked into what it would take to
move those to fetching from git?
Stefan
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your
(starting yet another thread to stay focused)
Having mulled through all the recent discussions on synchronous
replication, ISTM there is pretty wide consensus that having a registry
of all standbys in the master is a good idea. Even those who don't think
it's *necessary* for synchronous
On 09/22/2010 04:18 AM, Heikki Linnakangas wrote:
On 21/09/10 18:12, Tom Lane wrote:
Heikki Linnakangasheikki.linnakan...@enterprisedb.com writes:
On 21/09/10 11:52, Thom Brown wrote:
My fear would be standby.conf would be edited by users who don't
really know XML and then we'd have 3
On 22/09/10 11:33, Stefan Kaltenbrunner wrote:
Hi all!
It seems that the git move has broken the generation of the automatic
snapshot tarballs - has anybody yet looked into what it would take to
move those to fetching from git?
BTW, there is a nice command called in git to create tarballs:
On Wed, Sep 22, 2010 at 10:47, Heikki Linnakangas
heikki.linnakan...@enterprisedb.com wrote:
On 22/09/10 11:33, Stefan Kaltenbrunner wrote:
Hi all!
It seems that the git move has broken the generation of the automatic
snapshot tarballs - has anybody yet looked into what it would take to
On Wed, Sep 22, 2010 at 9:47 AM, Andrew Dunstan and...@dunslane.net wrote:
The ini file format is not flexible enough, IMNSHO. If we're going to adopt
a new config file format it should have these characteristics, among others:
well known (let's not invent a new one)
supports hierarchical
On 22/09/10 12:03, sub...@cse.iitb.ac.in wrote:
Actually, I used palloc() to set the stack base address.
And I am trying to create only a single thread, then also it is causing
problem.
Actually, I created all the data-structures using palloc(), then I am
passing these to the child thread. Even
On ons, 2010-09-22 at 10:33 +0200, Stefan Kaltenbrunner wrote:
It seems that the git move has broken the generation of the automatic
snapshot tarballs - has anybody yet looked into what it would take to
move those to fetching from git?
Depends on what's broken about it, but I notice that the
On ons, 2010-09-22 at 16:25 +0800, Craig Ringer wrote:
A single log file should obviously be in a single encoding, it's the
only sane way to do things. But which encoding is it in? And which
*should* it be in?
We need to produce the log output in the server encoding, because that's
how we need
On Wed, Sep 22, 2010 at 11:29, Peter Eisentraut pete...@gmx.net wrote:
On ons, 2010-09-22 at 10:33 +0200, Stefan Kaltenbrunner wrote:
It seems that the git move has broken the generation of the automatic
snapshot tarballs - has anybody yet looked into what it would take to
move those to
On Wed, Sep 22, 2010 at 11:11 AM, Magnus Hagander mag...@hagander.net wrote:
On Wed, Sep 22, 2010 at 11:29, Peter Eisentraut pete...@gmx.net wrote:
On ons, 2010-09-22 at 10:33 +0200, Stefan Kaltenbrunner wrote:
It seems that the git move has broken the generation of the automatic
snapshot
Peter Eisentraut wrote:
On ons, 2010-09-22 at 10:33 +0200, Stefan Kaltenbrunner wrote:
It seems that the git move has broken the generation of the automatic
snapshot tarballs - has anybody yet looked into what it would take to
move those to fetching from git?
Depends on what's broken about
On Wed, Sep 22, 2010 at 12:19, Dave Page dp...@pgadmin.org wrote:
On Wed, Sep 22, 2010 at 11:11 AM, Magnus Hagander mag...@hagander.net wrote:
On Wed, Sep 22, 2010 at 11:29, Peter Eisentraut pete...@gmx.net wrote:
On ons, 2010-09-22 at 10:33 +0200, Stefan Kaltenbrunner wrote:
It seems that the
On Tue, Sep 21, 2010 at 10:33 PM, Itagaki Takahiro
itagaki.takah...@gmail.com wrote:
I didn't read previous discussions, but did we have consensus that number
of tuples is better than other units for the parameter? For example,
threshold bytes or percentage in a page also seems to be reasonable
On Wed, Sep 22, 2010 at 10:33, Stefan Kaltenbrunner
ste...@kaltenbrunner.cc wrote:
Hi all!
It seems that the git move has broken the generation of the automatic
snapshot tarballs - has anybody yet looked into what it would take to move
those to fetching from git?
I think this should be
On Wed, Sep 22, 2010 at 4:18 AM, Dmitriy Igrishin dmit...@gmail.com wrote:
Okay, as Robert points, 0 code in successful messages seems as waste
of bytes. But according to the documentation, All messages emitted by the
PostgreSQL server are assigned five-character error codes that follow the
Magnus Hagander wrote:
On Wed, Sep 22, 2010 at 10:33, Stefan Kaltenbrunner
ste...@kaltenbrunner.cc wrote:
Hi all!
It seems that the git move has broken the generation of the automatic
snapshot tarballs - has anybody yet looked into what it would take to move
those to fetching from git?
I
On Tue, Sep 21, 2010 at 10:58 PM, Pei He hepeim...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Tom,
The bitmapset works for me.
I want to implement the operator for the following query:
Select * from a left join b on a.id = b.id order by b.id;
In a left outer join, I want the tuples that have matches in the inner
In
http://www.postgresql.org/docs/9.0/static/tutorial-window.html
it say
Although avg will produce the same result no matter what order it
processes the partition's rows in, this is not true of all window
functions. When needed, you can control that order using ORDER BY within
OVER.
While
On Tue, Sep 21, 2010 at 11:42 PM, Pei He hepeim...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
In ctid, there are the block num, and the tuple offset inside the block.
How can I know the maximum number of tuples in a block?
The block size would be BLCKSZ.
See MaxHeapTuplesPerPage and MaxIndexTuplesPerPage.
I am
At 2010-09-21 21:20:06 -0400, t...@sss.pgh.pa.us wrote:
So it seems like maybe we still need some more thought about how to
recognize related commits in different branches.
I'd suggest using git cherry-pick -x (or something similar) to mark
backported patches:
-x When recording the
On Thu, Sep 16, 2010 at 5:46 AM, Peter Eisentraut pete...@gmx.net wrote:
Following up on my previous patch [0], here is a fairly complete
implementation of this feature. The general description and
implementation outline of the previous message still apply. This patch
contains documentation
On 09/22/2010 04:54 AM, Dave Page wrote:
On Wed, Sep 22, 2010 at 9:47 AM, Andrew Dunstanand...@dunslane.net wrote:
The ini file format is not flexible enough, IMNSHO. If we're going to adopt
a new config file format it should have these characteristics, among others:
well known (let's not
On Wed, Sep 22, 2010 at 05:47, Tom Lane t...@sss.pgh.pa.us wrote:
Bruce Momjian br...@momjian.us writes:
However, keep in mind that creating a branch in every existing backpatch
branch is going to create even more backpatching monkey-work.
Monkey-work is scriptable though. It'll all be worth
On Wed, Sep 22, 2010 at 12:07 PM, Andrew Dunstan and...@dunslane.net wrote:
On 09/22/2010 04:54 AM, Dave Page wrote:
On Wed, Sep 22, 2010 at 9:47 AM, Andrew Dunstanand...@dunslane.net
wrote:
The ini file format is not flexible enough, IMNSHO. If we're going to
adopt
a new config file
On ons, 2010-09-22 at 12:22 +0200, Magnus Hagander wrote:
Mind you, I think bf members will need tweaking anyway, since they
will assume the old style cvs layout. AFAICT, git-cvsserver will
export each branch as a module, rather than one module as pgsql. We
can obviously get that working for
On Wed, Sep 22, 2010 at 13:20, Peter Eisentraut pete...@gmx.net wrote:
On ons, 2010-09-22 at 12:22 +0200, Magnus Hagander wrote:
Mind you, I think bf members will need tweaking anyway, since they
will assume the old style cvs layout. AFAICT, git-cvsserver will
export each branch as a module,
On 22/09/2010 5:45 PM, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
On ons, 2010-09-22 at 16:25 +0800, Craig Ringer wrote:
A single log file should obviously be in a single encoding, it's the
only sane way to do things. But which encoding is it in? And which
*should* it be in?
We need to produce the log output in
Peter Eisentraut wrote:
On ons, 2010-09-22 at 12:22 +0200, Magnus Hagander wrote:
Mind you, I think bf members will need tweaking anyway, since they
will assume the old style cvs layout. AFAICT, git-cvsserver will
export each branch as a module, rather than one module as pgsql. We
can obviously
Magnus Hagander wrote:
On Wed, Sep 22, 2010 at 13:20, Peter Eisentraut pete...@gmx.net wrote:
On ons, 2010-09-22 at 12:22 +0200, Magnus Hagander wrote:
Mind you, I think bf members will need tweaking anyway, since they
will assume the old style cvs layout. AFAICT, git-cvsserver will
export
On Wed, Sep 22, 2010 at 12:25 PM, Craig Ringer
cr...@postnewspapers.com.au wrote:
I don't think that's an OK answer, myself. Mixed encodings with no
delineation in one file = bug as far as I'm concerned. You can't even rely
on being able to search the log anymore. You'll only get away with it
On ons, 2010-09-22 at 13:25 +0200, Magnus Hagander wrote:
On Wed, Sep 22, 2010 at 13:20, Peter Eisentraut pete...@gmx.net wrote:
We need to have a fix for this before we can do any more backbranch
releases.
Fix for what, exactly? (assuming that people update their bf animals of
course)
On Wed, Sep 22, 2010 at 13:28, Stefan Kaltenbrunner
ste...@kaltenbrunner.cc wrote:
Magnus Hagander wrote:
On Wed, Sep 22, 2010 at 13:20, Peter Eisentraut pete...@gmx.net wrote:
On ons, 2010-09-22 at 12:22 +0200, Magnus Hagander wrote:
Mind you, I think bf members will need tweaking anyway,
On Wed, Sep 22, 2010 at 13:38, Peter Eisentraut pete...@gmx.net wrote:
On ons, 2010-09-22 at 13:25 +0200, Magnus Hagander wrote:
On Wed, Sep 22, 2010 at 13:20, Peter Eisentraut pete...@gmx.net wrote:
We need to have a fix for this before we can do any more backbranch
releases.
Fix for
On 09/22/2010 07:07 AM, Magnus Hagander wrote:
On Wed, Sep 22, 2010 at 05:47, Tom Lanet...@sss.pgh.pa.us wrote:
Bruce Momjianbr...@momjian.us writes:
However, keep in mind that creating a branch in every existing backpatch
branch is going to create even more backpatching monkey-work.
On Wed, Sep 22, 2010 at 13:47, Andrew Dunstan and...@dunslane.net wrote:
On 09/22/2010 07:07 AM, Magnus Hagander wrote:
On Wed, Sep 22, 2010 at 05:47, Tom Lanet...@sss.pgh.pa.us wrote:
Bruce Momjianbr...@momjian.us writes:
However, keep in mind that creating a branch in every existing
On ons, 2010-09-22 at 12:20 +0100, Dave Page wrote:
No, it's really not hierarchical. It only has goes one level deep.
I guess pgAdmin/wxWidgets are broken then :-)
[Servers]
Count=5
[Servers/1]
Server=localhost
Well, by that logic, even what we have now for postgresql.conf is
On ons, 2010-09-22 at 13:45 +0200, Magnus Hagander wrote:
On Wed, Sep 22, 2010 at 13:38, Peter Eisentraut pete...@gmx.net wrote:
For the NLS workflow, we need to have some kind of CVS server that
serves up all supported branches. Changing the URL or the module name
or whatever is fine.
On 09/22/2010 07:20 AM, Dave Page wrote:
On Wed, Sep 22, 2010 at 12:07 PM, Andrew Dunstanand...@dunslane.net wrote:
On 09/22/2010 04:54 AM, Dave Page wrote:
On Wed, Sep 22, 2010 at 9:47 AM, Andrew Dunstanand...@dunslane.net
wrote:
The ini file format is not flexible enough, IMNSHO. If
On Wed, Sep 22, 2010 at 12:50 PM, Peter Eisentraut pete...@gmx.net wrote:
On ons, 2010-09-22 at 12:20 +0100, Dave Page wrote:
No, it's really not hierarchical. It only has goes one level deep.
I guess pgAdmin/wxWidgets are broken then :-)
[Servers]
Count=5
[Servers/1]
Server=localhost
On 09/22/2010 06:22 AM, Magnus Hagander wrote:
Mind you, I think bf members will need tweaking anyway, since they
will assume the old style cvs layout. AFAICT, git-cvsserver will
export each branch as a module, rather than one module as pgsql. We
can obviously get that working for the HEAD
On Tue, Sep 21, 2010 at 22:23, Tom Lane t...@sss.pgh.pa.us wrote:
Magnus Hagander mag...@hagander.net writes:
On Tue, Sep 21, 2010 at 22:15, Tom Lane t...@sss.pgh.pa.us wrote:
Global patterns look ok to me. Thought you were going to stick leading
slashes on all the others?
Oh,
On Wed, Sep 22, 2010 at 5:43 PM, Heikki Linnakangas
heikki.linnakan...@enterprisedb.com wrote:
So let's put synchronous replication aside for now, and focus on standby
registration first. Once we have that, the synchronous replication patch
will be much smaller and easier to review.
Though I
On 09/22/2010 07:57 AM, Dave Page wrote:
On Wed, Sep 22, 2010 at 12:50 PM, Peter Eisentrautpete...@gmx.net wrote:
On ons, 2010-09-22 at 12:20 +0100, Dave Page wrote:
No, it's really not hierarchical. It only has goes one level deep.
I guess pgAdmin/wxWidgets are broken then :-)
[Servers]
On Wed, Sep 22, 2010 at 1:25 PM, Andrew Dunstan and...@dunslane.net wrote:
XML is not the only alternative - please don't use it as a straw man. For
example, here is a fragment from the Bacula docs using their hierarchical
format:
FileSet {
Name = Test
Include {
File =
On ons, 2010-09-22 at 19:25 +0800, Craig Ringer wrote:
Yep, I tend to think that'd be the right way to go. It'd still be a bit
of a pain, though, as messages written to stdout/stderr by the
postmaster should be in the system encoding, but messages written to the
log files should be in the
On 09/22/2010 08:32 AM, Dave Page wrote:
On Wed, Sep 22, 2010 at 1:25 PM, Andrew Dunstanand...@dunslane.net wrote:
XML is not the only alternative - please don't use it as a straw man. For
example, here is a fragment from the Bacula docs using their hierarchical
format:
FileSet {
Name =
Robert Haas robertmh...@gmail.com wrote:
I'm not even sure that it would be correct to say All error
messages..., unless elog(ERROR, can't happen) throws something
into that field.
If it doesn't, it should. Probably 'XX000' (internal_error).
-Kevin
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing
Markus Wanner mar...@bluegap.ch wrote:
I only get a: 404 - Unknown commit object on that link. Did you
push your work?
Yeah, but it has since been blown away (at my request) as part of my
attempt to get it based on the new git conversion. Sorry about
that. Attached is an mbox
On Wed, Sep 22, 2010 at 13:45, Magnus Hagander mag...@hagander.net wrote:
On Wed, Sep 22, 2010 at 13:38, Peter Eisentraut pete...@gmx.net wrote:
On ons, 2010-09-22 at 13:25 +0200, Magnus Hagander wrote:
On Wed, Sep 22, 2010 at 13:20, Peter Eisentraut pete...@gmx.net wrote:
We need to have a
On Tue, Sep 21, 2010 at 9:20 PM, Tom Lane t...@sss.pgh.pa.us wrote:
So it seems like maybe we still need some more thought about how to
recognize related commits in different branches. Or at the very least,
we need a best-practice document explaining how to manage this --- we
shouldn't expect
Tom Lane wrote:
Okay, so now that I've actually done a couple of multi-branch commits...
I'm using the multiple-work-directory arrangement suggested on our wiki
page. The work flow seems to boil down to:
* Prepare patch in master
* Stage patch with git add
* git diff --staged
On ons, 2010-09-22 at 19:44 +0900, Itagaki Takahiro wrote:
* CREATE TABLE (LIKE table_with_collation) doesn't inherit collations.
We need to copy collations by default, or add INCLUDING COLLATE option.
OK, should be easy to fix.
* upper() doesn't work if a column has a collation.
It
Craig Ringer cr...@postnewspapers.com.au writes:
On 22/09/2010 5:45 PM, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
We need to produce the log output in the server encoding, because that's
how we need to send it to the client.
That doesn't mean it can't be recoded for writing to the log file,
though. Perhaps
On Wed, Sep 22, 2010 at 9:01 AM, Andrew Dunstan and...@dunslane.net wrote:
I can't imagine trying to configure Bacula using ini file format - the mind
just boggles. Frankly, I'd rather stick with our current config format than
change to something as inadequate as ini file format.
Perhaps we
On Wed, Sep 22, 2010 at 8:21 AM, Fujii Masao masao.fu...@gmail.com wrote:
What if the number of standby entries in standby.conf is more than
max_wal_senders? This situation is allowed if we treat standby.conf
as just access control list like pg_hba.conf. But if we have to ensure
that all the
Peter Eisentraut pete...@gmx.net writes:
On ons, 2010-09-22 at 19:25 +0800, Craig Ringer wrote:
I still wonder if, rather than making this configurable, the right
choice is to force logging to UTF-8 (with BOM) across the board,
I don't think this would make things better or easier. At some
Bruce Momjian br...@momjian.us writes:
There is no need for 'git add' because once you are done you can use git
commmit -a in each branch to add all modifications and commit them.
git commit -a is not a universal solution. In particular, the patch
I was dealing with yesterday involved
So, I found (with some helpful hints from Robert who caught the final
nail in the coffin) a good reason why we really can't run a
git-cvsserver globally.
Any user can point their cvs client at the repository. And check out
an arbitrary branch, tag *or individual commit*. Doing so will create
a
On 22/09/10 16:54, Robert Haas wrote:
On Wed, Sep 22, 2010 at 8:21 AM, Fujii Masaomasao.fu...@gmail.com wrote:
What if the number of standby entries in standby.conf is more than
max_wal_senders? This situation is allowed if we treat standby.conf
as just access control list like pg_hba.conf.
On Tue, Sep 21, 2010 at 10:32 PM, Abhijit Menon-Sen a...@toroid.org wrote:
That's not it. I ran the same git gc command on my old repository, and
it didn't make any difference to the size. (I didn't try with a larger
window size, though.)
Probably lots of it has to do with the delta chains
Magnus Hagander mag...@hagander.net writes:
Any user can point their cvs client at the repository. And check out
an arbitrary branch, tag *or individual commit*. Doing so will create
a 50Mb sqlite database on the server with cache information about that
head.
That basically means that
On Wed, Sep 22, 2010 at 16:23, Tom Lane t...@sss.pgh.pa.us wrote:
Magnus Hagander mag...@hagander.net writes:
Any user can point their cvs client at the repository. And check out
an arbitrary branch, tag *or individual commit*. Doing so will create
a 50Mb sqlite database on the server with
Andrew Gierth and...@tao11.riddles.org.uk writes:
My opinion is that the gist-implementation section of the docs needs
to be substantially expanded so that it explains, for each support
function, exactly what the function is expected to do.
Yes, the GIST (and GIN) parts of the docs are really
On 09/22/2010 10:23 AM, Tom Lane wrote:
If we're going to let people in by IP address, maybe we could let legacy
buildfarm members in by IP address. It doesn't seem particularly
helpful to expect each buildfarm owner to solve this problem for
themselves. I'd also note that if they could run
sub...@cse.iitb.ac.in writes:
How can I increase the stack depth limit ? Is it only by modifying the
postgres.conf file, but there I cannot increase the stack depth beyond 4
MB.
Actually, my problem is that, when I set the stack base address of the
child thread using the POSIX library
Robert Haas robertmh...@gmail.com writes:
On Wed, Sep 22, 2010 at 4:18 AM, Dmitriy Igrishin dmit...@gmail.com wrote:
Okay, as Robert points, 0 code in successful messages seems as waste
of bytes. But according to the documentation, All messages emitted by the
PostgreSQL server are assigned
Stefan Kaltenbrunner ste...@kaltenbrunner.cc writes:
Magnus Hagander wrote:
I think this should be working now. I made this change to mk-snapshot,
and a similar one to mk-stable_snapshot. I have run the snapshot
generation for master, and the one for 8.4 should finish in a
minute or so. I
Hello list,
We intend to implement $subject, so instead of
mycursor CURSOR (myparm text) IS SELECT myparm;
OPEN mycursor('A');
it would be possible to do
OPEN mycursor(myparm := 'A');
The idea is to
* in pl_exec.exec_stmt_forc, detect if a positional parameter or named
parameter is used.
*
On Wed, Sep 22, 2010 at 16:50, Tom Lane t...@sss.pgh.pa.us wrote:
Stefan Kaltenbrunner ste...@kaltenbrunner.cc writes:
Magnus Hagander wrote:
I think this should be working now. I made this change to mk-snapshot,
and a similar one to mk-stable_snapshot. I have run the snapshot
generation for
On Tue, 2010-09-21 at 17:04 -0700, Josh Berkus wrote:
That said, the timeout option also feels a bit wishy-washy to me. With a
timeout, acknowledgment of a commit means your transaction is safely
committed in the master and slave. Or not, if there was some glitch with
the slave. That
Magnus Hagander mag...@hagander.net writes:
On Wed, Sep 22, 2010 at 16:50, Tom Lane t...@sss.pgh.pa.us wrote:
Do you still need someone to do that, and what do you want done exactly?
Just a second set of eyes that the output looks reasonable for being a
snapshot generated now.
Sure, I can
On Wed, Sep 22, 2010 at 10:30 AM, Tom Lane t...@sss.pgh.pa.us wrote:
If it would help, I'm prepared to put some time towards actually
writing something up for this.
That would be outstanding.
+1. Or really, plus several.
--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The
Andrew Dunstan and...@dunslane.net writes:
On 09/22/2010 10:23 AM, Tom Lane wrote:
If we're going to let people in by IP address, maybe we could let legacy
buildfarm members in by IP address. It doesn't seem particularly
helpful to expect each buildfarm owner to solve this problem for
Elvis Pranskevichus e...@prans.net wrote:
Instead of filtering non-merge commits I would suggest doing git
rebase on the latest revision of the old git repo. That way you
will get a set of commits that should apply cleanly. The reason
it is failing now is that it is impossible for git am
Yeb Havinga yebhavi...@gmail.com writes:
We intend to implement $subject, so instead of
mycursor CURSOR (myparm text) IS SELECT myparm;
OPEN mycursor('A');
it would be possible to do
OPEN mycursor(myparm := 'A');
Is this really worth the trouble? Is it supported by any other DBMS?
Are
On Wed, Sep 22, 2010 at 10:19 AM, Heikki Linnakangas
heikki.linnakan...@enterprisedb.com wrote:
No. The point of naming them is to uniquely identify them.
Hmm, that situation can arise if there's a network glitch which leads the
standby to disconnect, but the master still considers the
On Wed, Sep 22, 2010 at 6:03 AM, Dennis Björklund d...@zigo.dhs.org wrote:
In
http://www.postgresql.org/docs/9.0/static/tutorial-window.html
it say
Although avg will produce the same result no matter what order it
processes the partition's rows in, this is not true of all window
Peter Eisentraut wrote:
On tis, 2010-09-21 at 18:31 -0400, Bruce Momjian wrote:
Also, doesn't some SQL standard require oids, so we should have a way
to enable them by default for all tables?
From some DB2 example:
CREATE TYPE BusinessUnit_t AS
(Name VARCHAR(20),
Headcount
On ons, 2010-09-22 at 16:03 +0200, Magnus Hagander wrote:
That basically means that git-cvsserver is completely useless in a
public scenario as it stands. An easier way to DOS our server is hard
to find, really.
Now, if we can limit this by IP address, that would be ok. I assume we
can do
Robert Haas wrote:
[server]
guc=value
or
server.guc=value
Yes, this was my idea too. It uses our existing config file format.
--
Bruce Momjian br...@momjian.ushttp://momjian.us
EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com
+ It's
Tom Lane wrote:
Bruce Momjian br...@momjian.us writes:
There is no need for 'git add' because once you are done you can use git
commmit -a in each branch to add all modifications and commit them.
git commit -a is not a universal solution. In particular, the patch
I was dealing with
On Wed, Sep 22, 2010 at 12:21 PM, Peter Eisentraut pete...@gmx.net wrote:
On ons, 2010-09-22 at 16:03 +0200, Magnus Hagander wrote:
That basically means that git-cvsserver is completely useless in a
public scenario as it stands. An easier way to DOS our server is hard
to find, really.
Now,
On 22 September 2010 17:23, Bruce Momjian br...@momjian.us wrote:
Robert Haas wrote:
[server]
guc=value
or
server.guc=value
Yes, this was my idea too. It uses our existing config file format.
So...
sync_rep_services = {critical: recv=2, fsync=2, replay=1;
Excerpts from Peter Eisentraut's message of mié sep 22 12:21:45 -0400 2010:
Well, let's see. If someone can figure out the git equivalent of
if cvs -q update | egrep -q '^(U|P) '; then
# ... something changed, so run the update ...
fi
(assuming, for simplicity, that the current
At 2010-09-22 19:21:45 +0300, pete...@gmx.net wrote:
Well, let's see. If someone can figure out the git equivalent of
if cvs -q update | egrep -q '^(U|P) '; then
# ... something changed, so run the update ...
fi
I think you want:
git pull
if [ $(git rev-parse HEAD) != $(git
Thom Brown wrote:
On 22 September 2010 17:23, Bruce Momjian br...@momjian.us wrote:
Robert Haas wrote:
[server]
guc=value
or
server.guc=value
?
Yes, this was my idea too. ?It uses our existing config file format.
So...
sync_rep_services = {critical:
On Wed, Sep 22, 2010 at 12:40 PM, Bruce Momjian br...@momjian.us wrote:
Tom Lane wrote:
Bruce Momjian br...@momjian.us writes:
There is no need for 'git add' because once you are done you can use git
commmit -a in each branch to add all modifications and commit them.
git commit -a is not a
On Wed, Sep 22, 2010 at 17:08, Tom Lane t...@sss.pgh.pa.us wrote:
Magnus Hagander mag...@hagander.net writes:
On Wed, Sep 22, 2010 at 16:50, Tom Lane t...@sss.pgh.pa.us wrote:
Do you still need someone to do that, and what do you want done exactly?
Just a second set of eyes that the output
On Wed, 2010-09-22 at 17:43 +0100, Thom Brown wrote:
So...
sync_rep_services = {critical: recv=2, fsync=2, replay=1;
important: fsync=3;
reporting: recv=2, apply=1}
becomes ...
sync_rep_services.critical.recv = 2
1 - 100 of 180 matches
Mail list logo
