On Mon, 11 Oct 2010 13:22:13 -0400
Robert Haas robertmh...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Oct 7, 2010 at 7:20 AM, Shigeru HANADA
han...@metrosystems.co.jp wrote:
In this step, optimizer calls FdwRoutine-GetStatistics() to get
estimated costs of the foreign scan. ?FDW can calculate costs by
On Mon, 2010-10-11 at 13:30 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
What does pg_config --docdir report?
$ /usr/pgsql-9.0/bin/pg_config --docdir
/usr/share/doc/pgsql
I was expecting it to be somewhere in /usr/pgsql-9.0, where it is the
--prefix. Am I wrong?
Regards,
--
Devrim GÜNDÜZ
PostgreSQL
On Mon, 11 Oct 2010 08:29:16 -0500, Kevin Grittner
kevin.gritt...@wicourts.gov wrote:
David Fetter da...@fetter.org wrote:
Please find enclosed a WIP patch from one of my co-workers
intended to support JDBC's setQueryTimeout, along with the patch
for JDBC that uses it.
I agree that it
2010/10/12 Hitoshi Harada umi.tan...@gmail.com:
2010/10/12 Pavel Stehule pavel.steh...@gmail.com:
Hello
2010/10/11 Greg Stark gsst...@mit.edu:
On Sun, Oct 10, 2010 at 2:16 PM, Tom Lane t...@sss.pgh.pa.us wrote:
It was pointed out upthread that while median isn't presently
in the standard,
2010/10/11 KaiGai Kohei kai...@ak.jp.nec.com:
It enables us to put security hooks independent from MVCC visibility of
the new database object. If we pay attention for visibility of new database
object, it seems to me amount of things to understand and maintain will be
increased, although MVCC
On Sat, Oct 9, 2010 at 10:04 AM, Brendan Jurd dire...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi folks,
I have just set up HS+SR for the first time, and for the most part,
the docs were excellent. The one exception for me was the discussion
of archive_cleanup_command. This is a pretty important part of
(2010/10/12 20:59), Robert Haas wrote:
2010/10/11 KaiGai Koheikai...@ak.jp.nec.com:
It enables us to put security hooks independent from MVCC visibility of
the new database object. If we pay attention for visibility of new database
object, it seems to me amount of things to understand and
On Sat, Oct 9, 2010 at 11:13 AM, Brendan Jurd dire...@gmail.com wrote:
I understand that 'replication' is a keyword as far as the database
name is concerned, but I was surprised to find that it was treated as
a keyword in the username field also. I had a look in
src/backend/libpq/hba.c, and
Devrim =?ISO-8859-1?Q?G=DCND=DCZ?= dev...@gunduz.org writes:
On Mon, 2010-10-11 at 13:30 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
What does pg_config --docdir report?
$ /usr/pgsql-9.0/bin/pg_config --docdir
/usr/share/doc/pgsql
I was expecting it to be somewhere in /usr/pgsql-9.0, where it is the
--prefix.
On Tue, 2010-10-12 at 09:36 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
I think docdir is separate from the regular prefix. Try specifying
--docdir to configure.
Thanks, I'll test (not now, but soon).
Regards,
--
Devrim GÜNDÜZ
PostgreSQL Danışmanı/Consultant, Red Hat Certified Engineer
PostgreSQL RPM
On Tue, Oct 12, 2010 at 9:20 AM, KaiGai Kohei kai...@kaigai.gr.jp wrote:
As I introduced before, the idea of two hooks makes obvious where
we should put the security hooks; it is next to the existing DAC
checking. It is the best guideline, even if we will touch the code
around object creation
On Tue, Oct 12, 2010 at 04:04:56AM -0500, Radosław Smogura wrote:
On Mon, 11 Oct 2010 08:29:16 -0500, Kevin Grittner
kevin.gritt...@wicourts.gov wrote:
David Fetter da...@fetter.org wrote:
Please find enclosed a WIP patch from one of my co-workers
intended to support JDBC's
Excerpts from Dimitri Fontaine's message of dom oct 10 17:38:01 -0300 2010:
Hi,
So I'm beginning to work on the extension support for dump and restore,
and that begins with a new pg_extension catalog. I managed to break
initdb already, of course, but I'm fighting my way out — no luck with
David Fetter da...@fetter.org wrote:
Is there something incomplete about the ones I sent, and if so,
what?
Well, I'm still curious why it was necessary to modify the server
side to implement an interface feature for which everything needed
seems to be present on the client side. Is this
On Tue, Oct 12, 2010 at 10:37:00AM -0500, Kevin Grittner wrote:
David Fetter da...@fetter.org wrote:
Is there something incomplete about the ones I sent, and if so,
what?
Well, I'm still curious why it was necessary to modify the server
side to implement an interface feature for which
David Fetter da...@fetter.org wrote:
Let's imagine you have a connection pooler with two clients,
A and B.
I'm with you so far.
A calls setQueryTimeout, then starts a query, which terminates in
time, but dies before handling it.
Here you lost me. I don't know what that means.
B
On mån, 2010-10-11 at 21:34 +0300, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
* Why getnameinfo() in the fallback loop?
I checked through my git history; this was actually a leftover from
some
debugging code. I'll remove it.
* Slash ('/') after the hostname
At the parse_hba_line(), the parsed token
On tis, 2010-10-12 at 10:11 +0900, KaiGai Kohei wrote:
Is it really necessary to check reverse dns entries?
This has been extensively discussed in this thread.
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
On fre, 2010-10-08 at 11:19 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
Was this just a thinko in our transcription, or did they rename the
view columns somewhere along the line?
I suppose you figured this out already, but in some of my older draft
copies, the column did indeed have a different name. The other
On Tue, Oct 12, 2010 at 17:55, David Fetter da...@fetter.org wrote:
On Tue, Oct 12, 2010 at 10:37:00AM -0500, Kevin Grittner wrote:
David Fetter da...@fetter.org wrote:
Is there something incomplete about the ones I sent, and if so,
what?
Well, I'm still curious why it was necessary to
I would like to hear what people think of my observations about the
design of contrib/isn. In particular, I'd like Jan Otto to contribute
- he probably has more domain knowledge than I do. I haven't heard
from Jan about the proposed regression test.
In producing this patch, did you work off the
David Fetter da...@fetter.org writes:
Let's imagine you have a connection pooler with two clients, A and B.
A calls setQueryTimeout, then starts a query, which terminates in
time, but dies before handling it. B connects to the pool, gets A's
connection, and finds a statement_timeout that's
David Fetter da...@fetter.org writes:
On Mon, Oct 11, 2010 at 04:14:04PM +0530, Vaibhav Kaushal wrote:
Is there something like that in Kdevelop? I dont use CLI editors much.
KDevelop is listed as one of the editors that support ctags.
I've just developed some code for the backend and used
On Fri, Oct 8, 2010 at 08:09, Magnus Hagander mag...@hagander.net wrote:
On Fri, Oct 8, 2010 at 03:52, Andrew Dunstan and...@dunslane.net wrote:
On 10/07/2010 03:37 PM, Magnus Hagander wrote:
On Thu, Oct 7, 2010 at 21:31, Andrew Dunstanand...@dunslane.net wrote:
On 10/07/2010 10:11 AM,
Alvaro Herrera alvhe...@commandprompt.com writes:
As a note, I've had luck finding bootstrap-time bugs by manually feeding
the bootstrapping commands into bootstrap mode, with a leftover dir from
initdb --noclean. This has helped a few times that there has been no
PANIC but just a FATAL or
Peter Eisentraut pete...@gmx.net writes:
Hopefully final patch, which addresses the above issues, adds some
documentation enhancements, and the possibility to quote host names (in
case someone wants to have a host named samehost).
A few minor gripes:
+ If a host name is specified
On Tue, Oct 12, 2010 at 10:05:57PM +0200, Dimitri Fontaine wrote:
Alvaro Herrera alvhe...@commandprompt.com writes:
As a note, I've had luck finding bootstrap-time bugs by manually
feeding the bootstrapping commands into bootstrap mode, with a
leftover dir from initdb --noclean. This has
Robert Haas robertmh...@gmail.com writes:
That's probably not going to happen until we have a way to update
postgresql.conf via SQL. Which, I maintain, as I have maintained
before, is not going to happen until we get rid of the comments,
because otherwise absolutely any implementation anyone
Peter Eisentraut pete...@gmx.net writes:
Hopefully final patch, which addresses the above issues, adds some
documentation enhancements, and the possibility to quote host names (in
case someone wants to have a host named samehost).
Oh, I had an idea for a small improvement to this. It doesn't
On 10/12/2010 03:57 PM, Magnus Hagander wrote:
There's a simpler solution which I have just tested. Instead of patching,
use the Pg driver instead of SQLite. Set the dbname to %m. If the database
doesn't exist the cvs checkout will fail. So we just set up databases for
the modules we want to
On 10/12/2010 05:02 PM, Dimitri Fontaine wrote:
So, what you do is have a file per GUC, file name is the GUC name, first
line contains *ONLY* current value, the rest of the file is comments.
You're joking, right?
cheers
andrew
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list
Andrew Dunstan and...@dunslane.net writes:
On 10/12/2010 05:02 PM, Dimitri Fontaine wrote:
So, what you do is have a file per GUC, file name is the GUC name, first
line contains *ONLY* current value, the rest of the file is comments.
You're joking, right?
No. I just want both comments and
Dimitri Fontaine wrote:
Andrew Dunstan and...@dunslane.net writes:
On 10/12/2010 05:02 PM, Dimitri Fontaine wrote:
So, what you do is have a file per GUC, file name is the GUC name, first
line contains *ONLY* current value, the rest of the file is comments.
You're joking, right?
No. I
Darren Duncan dar...@darrenduncan.net wrote:
why is it not possible to retain the single existing postgres.conf
file format (human writable) *and* have it machine/SQL-editable
*and* maintain the comments?
My recollection of the previous discussion wasn't that there was no
way to do it, but
Darren, All,
All you would need is for the file parser to retain the
comments as metadata, include them in the relations that the SQL
commands see where the latter can also edit them as data, and then write
out the updated file with comments.
All you need to do in order to trisect and angle
[ sent to hackers where it belongs ]
Thom Brown wrote:
Hi,
I noticed that if I run this:
SELECT alias, description, token FROM
ts_debug('http://www.postgresql.org:2345/directory/page.html?version=9.1build=alpha1#summary');
I get:
alias | description |
Marko Tiikkaja marko.tiikk...@cs.helsinki.fi writes:
Here's a new version of the patch, deprecating pg_parse_and_rewrite.
I started looking at this patch, and I'm wondering why you inserted all
the Register/UnregisterSnapshot calls that weren't there before (eg, why
did spi.c have to change at
Josh Berkus wrote:
The fact that Postgres already
explicitly supports comment metadata in its system catalog means it must
already know something about this.
We support what?
Postgres has COMMENT ON ... SQL for various database objects and I assumed
that said comments would be stored in
On 2010-10-13 1:21 AM +0300, Tom Lane wrote:
Marko Tiikkajamarko.tiikk...@cs.helsinki.fi writes:
Here's a new version of the patch, deprecating pg_parse_and_rewrite.
I started looking at this patch, and I'm wondering why you inserted all
the Register/UnregisterSnapshot calls that weren't
Postgres has COMMENT ON ... SQL for various database objects and I
assumed that said comments would be stored in the system catalog.
Oh. Now that's an interesting perspective ... you're suggesting that we
take the comments and apply them as COMMENTS on the specific pg_settings?
That wouldn't
On Tue, Oct 12, 2010 at 3:54 PM, Josh Berkus j...@agliodbs.com wrote:
Oh. Now that's an interesting perspective ... you're suggesting that we
take the comments and apply them as COMMENTS on the specific pg_settings?
On a side note regarding comments, I'd like to make a request for a
more
Marko Tiikkaja marko.tiikk...@cs.helsinki.fi writes:
On 2010-10-13 1:21 AM +0300, Tom Lane wrote:
I started looking at this patch, and I'm wondering why you inserted all
the Register/UnregisterSnapshot calls that weren't there before
That's actually just my ignorance I forgot to mention. As
Bruce Momjian br...@momjian.us writes:
[ sent to hackers where it belongs ]
Thom Brown wrote:
It could be me being picky, but I don't regard parameters or page
fragments as part of the URL path.
Wow, that is a tough one. One the one hand, it seems nice to be able to
split stuff out more,
On 2010-10-13 2:10 AM +0300, Tom Lane wrote:
Marko Tiikkajamarko.tiikk...@cs.helsinki.fi writes:
That's actually just my ignorance I forgot to mention. As I understand
it, our code currently first pushes one snapshot and then does multiple
PushActiveSnapshot (or
Josh Berkus j...@agliodbs.com writes:
Postgres has COMMENT ON ... SQL for various database objects and I
assumed that said comments would be stored in the system catalog.
Oh. Now that's an interesting perspective ... you're suggesting that we
take the comments and apply them as COMMENTS on
Marko Tiikkaja marko.tiikk...@cs.helsinki.fi writes:
On 2010-10-13 2:10 AM +0300, Tom Lane wrote:
BTW, this patch seems to be also the time to remove the AtStart_Cache()
call in CommandCounterIncrement, as foreseen in the comment there.
Frankly, I have no idea what to do about this.
Just
Josh Berkus wrote first:
Postgres has COMMENT ON ... SQL for various database objects and I
assumed that said comments would be stored in the system catalog.
Oh. Now that's an interesting perspective ... you're suggesting that we
take the comments and apply them as COMMENTS on the specific
Richard Broersma wrote:
On Tue, Oct 12, 2010 at 3:54 PM, Josh Berkus j...@agliodbs.com wrote:
Oh. Now that's an interesting perspective ... you're suggesting that we
take the comments and apply them as COMMENTS on the specific pg_settings?
On a side note regarding comments, I'd like to make
(2010/10/12 23:09), Robert Haas wrote:
On Tue, Oct 12, 2010 at 9:20 AM, KaiGai Koheikai...@kaigai.gr.jp wrote:
As I introduced before, the idea of two hooks makes obvious where
we should put the security hooks; it is next to the existing DAC
checking. It is the best guideline, even if we will
Hi,
On Tue, Sep 7, 2010 at 6:16 AM, Alvaro Herrera
alvhe...@commandprompt.com wrote:
Excerpts from Jim Nasby's message of jue jun 10 17:54:43 -0400 2010:
test...@workbook=# select has_table_privilege( 'public', 'test', 'SELECT' );
ERROR: role public does not exist
Here's a patch
On Tue, Oct 12, 2010 at 10:05 PM, Itagaki Takahiro
itagaki.takah...@gmail.com wrote:
BTW, does the patch need to be back-patched to older versions?
Since they use get_roleid_checked() instead of get_role_oid(), the fix
cannot be applied cleanly to them, though it will be similar codes.
I would
On Tue, 2010-10-12 at 19:31 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
This seems much of a piece with the existing proposal to allow
individual words of a URL to be reported separately:
https://commitfest.postgresql.org/action/patch_view?id=378
As I said in that thread, this could be done in a
Excerpts from Itagaki Takahiro's message of mar oct 12 23:05:36 -0300 2010:
Hi,
On Tue, Sep 7, 2010 at 6:16 AM, Alvaro Herrera
alvhe...@commandprompt.com wrote:
Excerpts from Jim Nasby's message of jue jun 10 17:54:43 -0400 2010:
test...@workbook=# select has_table_privilege( 'public',
Robert Haas wrote:
On Tue, Sep 28, 2010 at 3:57 AM, Shigeru HANADA
han...@metrosystems.co.jp wrote:
On Mon, 27 Sep 2010 21:07:33 -0400
Robert Haas robertmh...@gmail.com wrote:
I found and fixed a few more issues and committed this. ?The pg_dump
support had a few escaping bugs, and I
On Sat, Oct 9, 2010 at 12:12 AM, Markus Wanner mar...@bluegap.ch wrote:
On 10/08/2010 04:48 PM, Fujii Masao wrote:
I believe many systems require write-availability.
Sure. Make sure you have enough standbies to fail over to.
Unfortunately even enough standbys don't increase write-availability
On Sat, Oct 9, 2010 at 1:41 AM, Josh Berkus j...@agliodbs.com wrote:
And, I'd like to know whether the master waits forever because of the
standby failure in other solutions such as Oracle DataGuard, MySQL
semi-synchronous replication.
MySQL used to be fond of simiply failing sliently. Not
On Sat, Oct 9, 2010 at 4:31 AM, Heikki Linnakangas
heikki.linnakan...@enterprisedb.com wrote:
Yes. But if there is no unsent WAL when the master goes down,
we can start new standby without new backup by copying the
timeline history file from new master to new standby and
setting
alvhe...@commandprompt.com wrote:
Excerpts from Jim Nasby's message of jue jun 10 17:54:43 -0400 2010:
test...@workbook=# select has_table_privilege( 'public', 'test', 'SELECT'
);
ERROR: role public does not exist
Here's a patch implementing this idea.
I applied it almost as-is,
On Fri, Oct 8, 2010 at 12:51 PM, Alexander Korotkov
aekorot...@gmail.com wrote:
Sorry, I'm pretty unconversant in git. Now, it should be ok.
I spent some time hacking on this. It doesn't appear to be too easy
to get levenshtein_less_equal() working without slowing down plain old
levenshtein()
59 matches
Mail list logo
