This is the new version of the patch.
It is not rebased to the HEAD because of a build error.
It's better to restore old two-path error handling.
I restorerd OOM and save result route. But it seems needed to
get back any amount of memory on REAL OOM as the comment in
original code says.
So I
On Thu, Feb 23, 2012 at 1:02 AM, Magnus Hagander mag...@hagander.net wrote:
On Tue, Feb 7, 2012 at 12:30, Fujii Masao masao.fu...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
http://www.depesz.com/2012/02/03/waiting-for-9-2-pg_basebackup-from-slave/
=$ time pg_basebackup -D /home/pgdba/slave2/ -F p -x stream -c fast
(2012/02/27 12:35), Robert Haas wrote:
On Sat, Feb 25, 2012 at 3:56 PM, Thom Brownt...@linux.com wrote:
If there seems to be a consensus on removing system column from foreign
tables, I'd like to work on this issue. Attached is a halfway patch,
and ISTM there is no problem so far.
I can
On Wed, Feb 8, 2012 at 1:33 AM, Magnus Hagander mag...@hagander.net wrote:
On Tue, Feb 7, 2012 at 17:29, Heikki Linnakangas
heikki.linnakan...@enterprisedb.com wrote:
On 07.02.2012 16:55, Tom Lane wrote:
(The integer vs float TimestampTz issue is a kind of portability
problem, but we've
2012/2/28 Shigeru Hanada shigeru.han...@gmail.com:
(2012/02/27 12:35), Robert Haas wrote:
On Sat, Feb 25, 2012 at 3:56 PM, Thom Brownt...@linux.com wrote:
If there seems to be a consensus on removing system column from foreign
tables, I'd like to work on this issue. Attached is a halfway
On 02/28/2012 12:10 AM, Tom Lane wrote:
I suggest replacing the first and third cases with something along the
lines of
Note: if you have standard_conforming_strings turned off, any
backslashes you write in literal string constants will need to be
doubled. See Section
On Fri, Feb 24, 2012 at 2:09 PM, Dimitri Fontaine
dimi...@2ndquadrant.fr wrote:
Hitoshi Harada umi.tan...@gmail.com writes:
I confirmed DROP EXTENSION is fixed now. In turn, it seems to me
requires doesn't work. My test ext2.control looks like:
I'm very sorry about that. It's all about
On 27 February 2012 19:37, Dimitri Fontaine dimi...@2ndquadrant.fr wrote:
Thom Brown t...@linux.com writes:
CREATE COMMAND TRIGGER test_cmd_trg
BEFORE CREATE SCHEMA,
CREATE OPERATOR,
CREATE COLLATION,
CREATE CAST
EXECUTE PROCEDURE my_func();
I couldn't drop it completely unless I
(2012/02/28 18:08), Thom Brown wrote:
If that's something that will likely be introduced in future, then
surely we'd want to keep the tableoid column rather than removing it
then re-introducing it later?
As background knowledge, currently (9.1 and 9.2dev) foreign tables have
all system
On 28 February 2012 11:43, Thom Brown t...@linux.com wrote:
On 27 February 2012 19:37, Dimitri Fontaine dimi...@2ndquadrant.fr wrote:
Thom Brown t...@linux.com writes:
CREATE COMMAND TRIGGER test_cmd_trg
BEFORE CREATE SCHEMA,
CREATE OPERATOR,
CREATE COLLATION,
CREATE CAST
EXECUTE
On Tue, Feb 28, 2012 at 7:00 AM, Shigeru Hanada
shigeru.han...@gmail.com wrote:
We have three options:
a) remove all system columns (posted patch)
b) remove system columns other than tableoid
c) leave all system columns as is (current 9.2dev)
Incidentally, views, which is very similar
2012年2月28日12:00 Shigeru Hanada shigeru.han...@gmail.com:
(2012/02/28 18:08), Thom Brown wrote:
If that's something that will likely be introduced in future, then
surely we'd want to keep the tableoid column rather than removing it
then re-introducing it later?
As background knowledge,
Thom Brown t...@linux.com writes:
Well the problem is that you can add commands to a trigger en masse,
but you can only remove them one at a time. Couldn't we at least
allow the removal of multiple commands at the same time? The docs you
wrote suggest you can do this, but you can't.
This
Tom Lane t...@sss.pgh.pa.us wrote:
This seems over-complicated. Triggers on tables do not have
alterable properties, why should command triggers? I vote for
CREATE COMMAND TRIGGER name ... properties ...;
DROP COMMAND TRIGGER name;
full stop. If you want to run the same
Robert Haas robertmh...@gmail.com writes:
On Tue, Feb 28, 2012 at 7:00 AM, Shigeru Hanada
shigeru.han...@gmail.com wrote:
We have three options:
a) remove all system columns (posted patch)
b) remove system columns other than tableoid
c) leave all system columns as is (current 9.2dev)
On 28 February 2012 15:03, Tom Lane t...@sss.pgh.pa.us wrote:
Thom Brown t...@linux.com writes:
Well the problem is that you can add commands to a trigger en masse,
but you can only remove them one at a time. Couldn't we at least
allow the removal of multiple commands at the same time? The
On Fri, Feb 24, 2012 at 5:31 PM, Peter Eisentraut pete...@gmx.net wrote:
Could we name this postgresql_fdw instead? We already have several
${productname}_fdw out there, and I don't want to get in the business of
having to guess variant spellings.
If you don't like variant spellings, having
Robert Haas robertmh...@gmail.com writes:
On Fri, Feb 24, 2012 at 5:31 PM, Peter Eisentraut pete...@gmx.net wrote:
Could we name this postgresql_fdw instead? We already have several
${productname}_fdw out there, and I don't want to get in the business of
having to guess variant spellings.
On Tue, Feb 28, 2012 at 11:02 AM, Tom Lane t...@sss.pgh.pa.us wrote:
Robert Haas robertmh...@gmail.com writes:
On Fri, Feb 24, 2012 at 5:31 PM, Peter Eisentraut pete...@gmx.net wrote:
Could we name this postgresql_fdw instead? We already have several
${productname}_fdw out there, and I don't
On Wed, Feb 22, 2012 at 03:37:29PM -0500, Bruce Momjian wrote:
On Wed, Feb 22, 2012 at 05:22:29PM -0300, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
Not sure about this. If the upgrades completes successfully and the
file is not renamed at the last minute due to some error, that would be
a problem as well,
2012/2/24 Yeb Havinga yebhavi...@gmail.com:
On 2012-02-24 15:17, Yeb Havinga wrote:
I don't know what's fishy about the mgrid user and root that causes
c0.c1023 to be absent.
more info:
In shells started in a x environment under Xvnc, id -Z shows the system_u
and c0.c1023 absent.
In
On Thu, Feb 23, 2012 at 3:17 AM, Greg Smith g...@2ndquadrant.com wrote:
I think an even bigger factor now is that the BGW writes can disturb write
ordering/combining done at the kernel and storage levels. It's painfully
obvious now how much PostgreSQL relies on that to get good performance.
On 02/27/2012 10:05 PM, Lucky Haryadi wrote:
3. When Master A fails to service, the database will failovered to Slave
B by triggering with trigger file.
As soon as you trigger a standby, it changes it to a new timeline. At
that point, the series of WAL files diverges. It's no longer
On Tue, Feb 28, 2012 at 1:15 AM, Ants Aasma ants.aa...@eesti.ee wrote:
My hypothesis for the TPS regression is that it is due to write combining.
When the workload is mainly bound by I/O, every little bit that can be saved
helps the bottomline. Larger scalefactors don't get the benefit because
- Цитат от Andrea Suisani (sick...@opinioni.net), на 28.02.2012 в 09:54
-
On 02/28/2012 04:52 AM, Rob Wultsch wrote:
On Wed, Feb 22, 2012 at 2:31 PM, jamesja...@mansionfamily.plus.com wrote:
Has anyone considered managing a system like the DragonFLY swapcache for a
DBMS like
I have a few comments about this patch:
I didn't like the fact that the checker calling infrastructure uses
SPI instead of just a FunctionCallN to call the checker function. I
think this should be easily avoidable.
Second, I see that functioncmds.c gets a lot into trigger internals just
to be
Hello
I try to look on one slow query with correlated subquery:
create table xx(a int primary key);
create table yy(a int);
insert into xx select generate_series(1,100);
insert into yy select (random()*100)::int from generate_series(1,10);
create index on yy(a);
Query A
select a,
On Tue, Feb 28, 2012 at 11:36 AM, Jeff Janes jeff.ja...@gmail.com wrote:
How hard would it be to dummy up a bgwriter which, every time it wakes
up, it forks off a child process to actually do the write, and then
the real one just waits for the child to exit? If it didn't have to
correctly
- Цитат от Robert Haas (robertmh...@gmail.com), на 28.02.2012 в 19:25 -
On Tue, Feb 28, 2012 at 11:36 AM, Jeff Janes jeff.ja...@gmail.com wrote:
How hard would it be to dummy up a bgwriter which, every time it wakes
up, it forks off a child process to actually do the write, and then
On Tue, Feb 28, 2012 at 11:46 AM, Robert Haas robertmh...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Feb 28, 2012 at 1:15 AM, Ants Aasma ants.aa...@eesti.ee wrote:
My hypothesis for the TPS regression is that it is due to write combining.
When the workload is mainly bound by I/O, every little bit that can be
Jeff Janes jeff.ja...@gmail.com writes:
How hard would it be to dummy up a bgwriter which, every time it wakes
up, it forks off a child process to actually do the write, and then
the real one just waits for the child to exit? If it didn't have to
correctly handle signals, SINVAL, and such, it
On Mon, Feb 27, 2012 at 4:03 AM, Simon Riggs si...@2ndquadrant.com wrote:
So please use a scale factor that the hardware can cope with.
OK. I tested this out on Nate Boley's 32-core AMD machine, using
scale factor 100 and scale factor 300. I initialized it with Simon's
patch, which should have
On Tue, Feb 28, 2012 at 11:21 AM, Bruce Momjian br...@momjian.us wrote:
On Wed, Feb 22, 2012 at 03:37:29PM -0500, Bruce Momjian wrote:
On Wed, Feb 22, 2012 at 05:22:29PM -0300, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
Not sure about this. If the upgrades completes successfully and the
file is not renamed at
On 02/24/2012 03:18 PM, Florian Weimer wrote:
* Alex Shulgin:
It's ugly, but it's standard practice, and seems better than a separate
-d parameter (which sort of defeats the purpose of URIs).
Hm, do you see anything what's wrong with ?dbname=other if you don't
like a separate -d?
It's not
Excerpts from Robert Haas's message of mar feb 28 15:24:45 -0300 2012:
I think you should rename the old control file just before the step
that says linking user relation files. That's the point after which
it becomes unsafe to start the old cluster, right?
Also, if it's not using link
On Sun, Feb 26, 2012 at 7:36 AM, Peter Eisentraut pete...@gmx.net wrote:
On lör, 2012-02-25 at 14:21 +0100, Christoph Berg wrote:
Well, I'm trying to invoke the extension's make check target at
extension build time. I do have a temporary installation I own
somehwere in my $HOME, but that is
On tis, 2012-02-28 at 11:20 -0500, Robert Haas wrote:
[ snicker ] But still, Peter has a point: pgsql is not a name for
the
product, it's at best an abbreviation. We aren't calling the other
thing orcl_fdw or ora_fdw.
I think either postgres_fdw or postgresql_fdw would be fine.
I
On Tue, Feb 28, 2012 at 01:24:45PM -0500, Robert Haas wrote:
Running this script will delete the old cluster's data files:
/usr/local/pgdev/pg_upgrade/delete_old_cluster.sh
I think you should rename the old control file just before the step
that says linking user relation files. That's
On Tue, Feb 28, 2012 at 03:48:03PM -0300, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
Excerpts from Robert Haas's message of mar feb 28 15:24:45 -0300 2012:
I think you should rename the old control file just before the step
that says linking user relation files. That's the point after which
it becomes
On Tue, Feb 28, 2012 at 6:11 PM, Robert Haas robertmh...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Feb 27, 2012 at 4:03 AM, Simon Riggs si...@2ndquadrant.com wrote:
So please use a scale factor that the hardware can cope with.
OK. I tested this out on Nate Boley's 32-core AMD machine, using
scale factor 100
Hello
Dne 28. února 2012 17:48 Alvaro Herrera alvhe...@commandprompt.com napsal(a):
I have a few comments about this patch:
I didn't like the fact that the checker calling infrastructure uses
SPI instead of just a FunctionCallN to call the checker function. I
think this should be easily
On Feb 28, 2012, at 8:20 AM, Robert Haas wrote:
I liked the shorter name, myself, but I'm not going to make a big deal about
it.
pg_ is used quite a bit. what about pg_fdw?
David
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
Excerpts from Pavel Stehule's message of mar feb 28 16:30:58 -0300 2012:
I refreshed patch for current git repository.
Thanks, I'll have a look.
Oh, another thing -- you shouldn't patch the 1.0 version of the plpgsql
extension. Rather I think you should produce a 1.1 version.
--
Álvaro
2012/2/28 Alvaro Herrera alvhe...@commandprompt.com:
Excerpts from Pavel Stehule's message of mar feb 28 16:30:58 -0300 2012:
I refreshed patch for current git repository.
Thanks, I'll have a look.
Oh, another thing -- you shouldn't patch the 1.0 version of the plpgsql
extension. Rather
In gram.y we have a new check_option_list nonterminal. This is mostly
identical to explain_option_list, except that the option args do not
take a NumericOnly (only opt_boolean_or_string and empty). I wonder if
it's really worthwhile having a bunch of separate productions for this;
how about we
Pavel Stehule pavel.steh...@gmail.com writes:
Why there are a SubPlan 2?
http://git.postgresql.org/gitweb/?p=postgresql.gita=commitdiffh=bd3daddaf232d95b0c9ba6f99b0170a0147dd8af
regards, tom lane
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To
2012/2/28 Tom Lane t...@sss.pgh.pa.us:
Pavel Stehule pavel.steh...@gmail.com writes:
Why there are a SubPlan 2?
http://git.postgresql.org/gitweb/?p=postgresql.gita=commitdiffh=bd3daddaf232d95b0c9ba6f99b0170a0147dd8af
regards, tom lane
Thank you - I can verify so it
2012/2/28 Alvaro Herrera alvhe...@commandprompt.com:
In gram.y we have a new check_option_list nonterminal. This is mostly
identical to explain_option_list, except that the option args do not
take a NumericOnly (only opt_boolean_or_string and empty). I wonder if
it's really worthwhile
On Thu, Feb 2, 2012 at 4:26 PM, Oleg Bartunov o...@sai.msu.su wrote:
Hi there,
attached patch introduces NULLs indexing for SP-GiST. With this patch
Sp-GiST supports IS NULL, IS NOT NULL clauses, as well as full index scan.
I was looking at this.
It passes all regression tests, and seems to
I was experimenting today with a test case sent to me by somebody at Red
Hat. The details aren't too important, except that it involves an inner
join on the inside of a left join (where it cannot commute with the left
join). I can reproduce the behavior with a standard regression test
table, if
Daniel Farina dan...@heroku.com writes:
Thinking unnecessary. Motion is progress. Here is a patch that uses
this exact plan: pgport for the tables, broken out into a header file
that is included in the building of libpgport. I have confirmed by
objdump -t that multiple copies of the table
All,
First, I've added a wiki page:
http://wiki.postgresql.org/wiki/PgCon2012CanadaClusterSummit
Second, please RSVP! At this point I've heard from a total of 3 people.
I need to know who/how many are coming so that I can book the space,
and lunch.
--
Josh Berkus
PostgreSQL Experts Inc.
Hi,
This is Koichi. I'm joining the summit. I've heard at least two or
more people will join from NTT.I'm expecting a couple of people
from EDB too.
Regards;
--
Koichi Suzuki
2012/2/29 Josh Berkus j...@agliodbs.com:
All,
First, I've added a wiki page:
Hi Josh,
Second, please RSVP! At this point I've heard from a total of 3 people.
I need to know who/how many are coming so that I can book the space,
and lunch.
Sorry for my late reply.
I will join the cluster meeting as a member of Postgres-XC.
Regards,
--
Michael Paquier
Seems there is a trivial typo in json.h
diff --git a/src/include/utils/json.h b/src/include/utils/json.h
index 415787b..fa0d4fc 100644
--- a/src/include/utils/json.h
+++ b/src/include/utils/json.h
@@ -26,4 +26,4 @@ extern Datum row_to_json(PG_FUNCTION_ARGS);
extern Datum
On Tue, Feb 28, 2012 at 02:15:30PM -0500, Bruce Momjian wrote:
On Tue, Feb 28, 2012 at 01:24:45PM -0500, Robert Haas wrote:
Running this script will delete the old cluster's data files:
/usr/local/pgdev/pg_upgrade/delete_old_cluster.sh
I think you should rename the old control file
Excerpts from Haifeng Liu's message of mar feb 28 23:31:26 -0300 2012:
Seems there is a trivial typo in json.h
Thanks, fixed.
--
Álvaro Herrera alvhe...@commandprompt.com
The PostgreSQL Company - Command Prompt, Inc.
PostgreSQL Replication, Consulting, Custom Development, 24x7 support
--
(2012/02/28 23:37), Kohei KaiGai wrote:
2012年2月28日12:00 Shigeru Hanadashigeru.han...@gmail.com:
We have three options:
a) remove all system columns (posted patch)
b) remove system columns other than tableoid
c) leave all system columns as is (current 9.2dev)
Incidentally, views, which is
58 matches
Mail list logo
